How They Control

Is Crestone/Baca the “Vatican City” of the New World Order?

Eric T. Karlstrom, Emeritus Professor of Geography

How The Controllers Control Us?  The Co-Option and Corruption of Culture and Institutions

May all beings have happiness and the causes of happiness (which is “good karma”)

May all be free from sorrow and the causes of sorrow (“bad karma”)

May all never be separated from the sacred happiness which is sorrow-less (joy)

And may all live in equanimity without too much attachment and too much aversion

And live believing in the equality of all that lives (equanimity).

                                                                        Tibetan Buddhist daily prayer


I preface this section of my paper with the above Buddhist prayer because, in my opinion, it expresses the essence of genuine spiritual practice.  This prayer helps people to cultivate and spread the “Four Immeasurables;” love, compassion, joy, and equanimity.  The last line of the prayer honors the “equality of all that lives.”  In the Buddhist view, all beings have “Buddha nature” and are capable of becoming fully enlightened.  A human birth is considered the result of very great merit and is thought to be best of the six realms of cyclic existence because only humans can become enlightened.  Thus, the Buddha completely repudiated the Hindu/Brahmanic caste system, just as Christ’s teachings were the complete antithesis and repudiation of the racist and elitist teachings of the Pharisaic Jews.

Thus, in my opinion, any “religion” that views a tiny elite as gods and all others as their slaves is the complete opposite and the complete perversion of religion.  For this reason, it must be exposed as simply a fraudulent and perverse mechanism to obtain and maintain political power.  The antidote to this colossal fraud?  The truth.  “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:32).

By what means do the very few control the very many with the ultimate goal of enslaving them?  The answer is to be found in a strange admixture of:  1) propaganda through media, government, education, and entertainment, 2) networks of “influence,” including corporations and secret societies, 3) “black science and technology,” 4) occult black magic, and 5) false religion, and 6) mind control.  As noted previously, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion provides a good introduction to the goals and methods of our would-be “controllers.”

My goal here is to provide the historical and institutional context for the ultra-secret mind control programs now being carried out by various governments (notably Germany, the Soviet Union, England, the United States, and Canada) against the interests of the people of the world.  In the next section (Part VI), we will explore many of the “scientific” advances in the mind control of individuals and society at large.

As an emeritus geography professor, I am not privy to any insider information on these topics.  Rather, I am simply compiling the facts and perspectives of other researchers, emphasizing those that seem most logical and coherent to me.  Because I rely primarily on other’s research, I extensively quote their work directly.

In the “alternative” history that emerges here, it becomes clear that innumerable “gentile front” organizations do the bidding of “The Money Power” that was described in Part IV of this series.  Among these fronts, of course, are the various intelligence agencies of the nations, which rather consistently serve the elite rather than society in general.  In this section, I focus primarily on the extensive network of organizations through which the world’s international elite maintains control.  Through control of funding of these organizations and institutions, the elite effectively enlists and co-opts the brains and services of the world’s “intellectuals” toward this end as well.

The late Jim Keith stated in Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness (1999):

Agents of the world’s elite have been long engaged in a war on the populace of Earth.  Greed is the motivation for this war, a  greed so pervasive that it encompasses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in recent times a philosophy has been used to justify that greed.  It is the philosophy of mass control, that ultimately aims at dictating every aspect of human life – even remolding man’s perception of reality and himself.

Although the lust for control can be discerned since the beginning of recorded history, (one) nexus of particular importance arose in Germany in the latter half of the 19th century.  As the country increased in military and industrial might, becoming the strongest power in Europe, a revolution simultaneously took place in German philosophic and scientific thought that paradoxically would spread through the world to create positive technological change as well as to birth innumerable toxic children.   According to one source:

The spread of the materialistic philosophy of life was worldwide in this age, and the idolatry of power was not confined to Germany, but its corrosive effect was particularly strong in a country that was not inured to power.  [Germany, History Since 1850, 963].

One aspect of this transformation, this “idolatry of power,” was a negative transformation of the psychological sciences.   In the late 19th century, earlier more humanistic approaches to understanding mankind were replaced by a scientific philosophy that would be employed less as a measure for the understanding of man than as a justification for a new feudalism and a mechanism of pure control.

The materialist overhauling of psychology was in great part ushered in by the work of the German psychologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt.  Wundt was a professor of philosophy at the University of Leipzig, and in 1875 established the world’s first psychological laboratory there, a move that would eventually turn the world of more humanistic-oriented psychology on its head.  Wundt’s grandfather is documented as having been a member of the Illuminati secret society, making it not unreasonable to imagine that Herr professor may also have been a member of that group.

Wundt, in reflection of a powerful materialistic groundswell in German thought that began with Schopenhauer at the beginning of the 19th century and that was to be later epitomized by Karl Marx, rejected in cavalier fashion the notion that man might have a soul or deeper significance than the merely physical, that he was in fact anything more than an animal.   Following this line of reasoning, an approach that came to be known in psychology as Structuralism, Wundt insisted that all psychological studies should depend entirely on the study of body reactions.  The truth of man, Wundt insisted, could be determined solely through mechanistic means: measurement, analysis, and dissection of bodies.  After Wundt had thoroughly infused the psychological sciences with his materialist approach, many scientists – and the members of the ruling class that employed them – believed that they were justified in treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat, and as an overall plan of action, proceded to do so.

The materialist psychological doctrine spread rapidly with at least twenty-four laboratories established by Wundt’s students between the years 1883 and 1893, with more of the German’s acolytes fanning out to infiltrate related fields, such as education.  Wundt’s materialistic approach would infect the thinking of most of the influential psychologists, psychiatrists, educators, and social planners who would follow in the 20th century.

One man who marched to Wundt’s dirge was the Russian, Ivan Petrovich Pavlov.  Pavlov conducted a wide-ranging research into techniques of control, primarily using dogs for his experimentation.   In the now-famous experiment, Pavlov fed his dogs, stimulating salivation, while at the same time ringing a bell.  After doing this many times, Pavlov was able to stimulate salivation in reaction to the sound of the bell alone.  Other of Pavlov’s experiments involved rewarding dogs with petting, or punishing them with pain.  Using these kinds of approaches, Pavlov developed his theory of the conditioned reflex, demonstrating that animals are motivated by patterns of conditioned response, and that conditioning can be artificially induced. 

The results of Pavlov’s experiments did not escape the social planners of his day, nor those who would follow.  Remember: those who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status quo.  It is obvious that they cannot completely control the propagation of the information…

So, how do they “keep secrets?” They don’t.   Everything is right out there in the public domain.  Anybody who wants to can do the research we have done and come to the realizations we have in this process.  BUT, not everyone is able to withstand the OTHER weapon of Mass Control:  Ridicule.The most effective weapon of COINTELPRO (counter-intelligence program) is Ridicule and Debunking….  this is done via manipulation of individuals in areas of important public influence – including the academic world and the mass media.



Figure 1.  Wilhelm Wundt, the father of experimental psychology, and Ivan Pavlov, Russian experimental physiologist.

In the above quote, we see how the emerging science of psychology was co-opted early on for the benefit of the “controllers.”  Recall, also, that powerful nations are targeted, infiltrated, and controlled by the “controllers” and used to advance the millennia-old agenda of world control by the “chosen people.”   Britain, Germany, the United States, and the former Soviet Union, in particular, have been controlled toward this end.  By playing these nations off against each other, as in the Cold War, the “controllers” fool the public into believing that the “enemy” is another “enemy” nation.  In fact, each of these nations is infiltrated and controlled by the “The Conspiracy.”  The image that comes to my mind is one of a vast puppet show, with the “International Conspiracy” pulling the various and sundry strings through their control of finance, media, politicians, etc.

After Germany was defeated by “the allies” in World Wars I and II, the nexus of political power and of mind control research shifted from Germany to Britain, the U.S. and Canada.

In Operation Mind Control: The CIA Plot Against America (1978), Walter Bowart identifies the “secret government” as the “cryptocracy” (meaning “rule by secrecy”) and reveals the central role of the CIA and other intelligence agencies in the development of mind control techniques as well as in the manipulation of world events and our lives.  In A Nation Betrayed: The Chilling True Story of Secret Cold War Experiments on Children and Other Innocent People (2001), mind-control victim, Carol Ruiz, offers her first-hand glimpse into the hidden “powers-that-be:”

I was told I worked for “The Agency.”  It was in actuality, key men and women in the CIA and other branches of government, in league with certain extremely wealthy individuals who wanted to remain in the shadows shaping the outcome of world events.

A.  Pre-WWII British-German-American Cooperation of “Research” Toward a Mind-Controlled and “Racially Purified” New World Order

Ron Patton summarizes the nature of the Illuminati-controlled “Anglo Alliance in his article, “Project Monarch: Nazi Mind Control,”   Most of this information would not be presented in main-stream history classes in the United States!:

By the 19th century, Great Britain and Germany were recognized as the primary geographic areas of Illuminati control.   It then should be of little surprise to know the first work in Behavioral Science research was established in England in 1882, while much of the early medical and psychiatric techniques involved in mind control were pioneered at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany.   The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations was set up in London in 1921 to study the breaking point of humans.   Kurt Lewin, a German psychologist, became the director of the Tavistock Institute in 1932, about the same time Nazi Germany was increasing its research into neuropsychology, parapsychology and multi-generational occultism.

Interestingly, a progressive exchange of scientific ideas was taking place between England and Germany, most notably in the field of eugenics: the movement devoted to improving the human species through the control of hereditary factors in mating.   The nefariously enigmatic union between the two countries was bonded, partly through the Order of the Golden Dawn, a secret society which consisted of many high ranking officials in the Nazi party and British aristocracy.  Top SS Nazi officer, Heinrich Himmler, was in charge of a scientific project called Lebersborn (“fountain of life”), which included selective breeding and adoption of children, a peculiarly large number of twins among them.  The purpose of the program was to create a super-race (Aryans) who would have total allegiance to the cause of the Third Reich (New World Order).

Much of the preliminary experimentation concerning genetic engineering and behavior modification was conducted by Dr. Josef Mengele at Auschwitz, where he coldly analyzed the effects of trauma-bonding, eye-coloring and twinning upon his victims.  Beside the insidious surgical experimentation performed at the concentration camp, some of the children were subjected to massive amounts of electroshock.  Sadly, many of them did not survive the brutality.

Concurrently, brain-washing was carried out on inmates at Dachau, who were placed under hypnosis and given the hallucinogenic drug mescaline.  During the war, parallel behavioral research was led by (high level Freemason) Dr. George Estabrooks of Colgate University (in the U.S.).  His involvement with the Army, CIA, FBI and other agencies remains shrouded in secrecy.  However, Estabrooks would occasionally slip and discuss his work involving the creation of hypno-programmed couriers and hypnotically-induced split personalities.

After WWII, the U.S. Department of Defense secretly imported many of the top German Nazi and Italian Fascist scientists and spies into the United States via South America and the Vatican.  The code name for this operation was Project PAPERCLIP.   One of the more prominent finds for the U.S. was German General Reinhard Gehlen, Hitler’s Chief of Intelligence against Russia.  Upon arriving in Washington D.C. in 1945, Gehlen met extensively with President Truman, General William Wild Bill Donovan, Director of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and Allen Dulles, who would later become the stalwart head of the CIA.   The objective of their brainstorming sessions was to reorganize the nominal American intelligence operation, transforming it into a highly-efficient covert organization.  The culmination of their efforts produced the Central Intelligence Group in 1946, renamed the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1947.

Reinhard Gehlen also had profound influence in helping to create the National Security Council, from which the National Security Act of 1947 was derived.  This particular piece of legislation was implemented to protect an unconscionable number of illegal government activities, including clandestine mind control programs.  (The CIA and the much larger National Security Agency, NSA were formed in 1947.)

The above quote is breathtaking in the sweep of the historical connections it makes.  To re-cap: Patton points out that in the late 19th century, “Illuminati-controlled” Britain and “Illuminati-controlled” Germany were at the vanguard of research into “behavioral science.”  A major goal of this new field, pursued in conjunction with occult secret societies such as the Order of the Golden Dawn, was to develop a “super-race” with total commitment to bringing in the Third Reich (New World Order).   This pre-WWII “eugenics movement” led to experiments in genetic engineering,  behavior modification, trauma-bonding, and application of massive doses of electroshock that were conducted by Dr. Josef Mengele (the “angel of death”) and other “behavioral scientists” at the Auschwitz concentration camp in Nazi Germany during WWII.  Simultaneously, brain-washing experiments were carried out on inmates at Dachau, who were placed under hypnosis and given the hallucinogenic drug mescaline.   (In the previous section, we learned that the top Nazis themselves were allied with the political forces of Zionism and that Jews and communists controlled the Nazi concentration camps!).

Meanwhile, in the United States, parallel “behavioral research” into hypnosis was led by (high-level Freemason) Dr. George Estabrooks of Colgate University, under contract with the Army, CIA, FBI and other U.S. agencies.  Estabrooks later acknowledged that these experiments involved the creation of hypno-programmed couriers and hypnotically-induced split personalities.

Patton also reveals that top Nazi intelligence agents and mind control scientists were imported into the United States and South America after World War II via the CIA’s Operation Paperclip.  Nazi intelligence officers such as Richard Gehlen helped design and control the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency.  Thenceforth, Nazi mind control (and “master race”) experiments continued after WWII under numerous super-secret projects, including the CIA’s Operation Artichoke, Operation Bluebird, and the infamous Operation MK-ULTRA.   Much more about these programs in Part VI of this series.

Here again, we are presented with strong evidence of the covert influence of the “supra-national” “Hidden Hand” that guided scientific research concurrently in three countries even while those countries were officially at war with one another.  We also see the simultaneous and pervasive coordination of intelligence agencies, academic institutions, and secret societies towards a common objective.

By thus moving back and forth through history, we can better identify our “controllers” and begin to trace their obsession with mind control.  Anton Chaitkin (2002) provides more details of the elite connections that lead up to World War I.  Clearly, at this juncture in the “The Conspiracy,” an international network of individuals played a pivotal role in it’s implementation:

John D. Rockefeller had begun his oil business in the 1860’s with British capital.  The family’s relationship to the British Empire a half-century later was centered in the person of John D. ‘s brother, William Rockefeller, the president of Standard Oil of New York (later Mobil) and the founder of National City Bank (later Citibank).   In 1911, brother William employed, in a private capacity through his elite social club, a high-ranking British secret intelligence service officer named Claude Dansey.

As the United States prepared to ally itself in World War I with its old enemy, Britain, Dansey personally reorganized the U.S. Army intelligence service into an adjunct of the British secret service.  Dansey’s loyal U.S. follower, Gen. Marlborough Churchill, (a distant relative of Britain’s Winston Churchill) soon became director of U.S. military intelligence.  After World War I, General Churchill headed up the “Black Chamber,” a New York-based espionage group serving the State Department, the U.S. Army, and private New York financiers loyal to Great Britain.  This same General Churchill would soon launch a medical research organization, the Macy Foundation, for the Rockefellers and British intelligence.

Chaitkin points out that during the 1920’s, the Rockefeller Foundation poured money into the occupied German Republic in order to advance the medical specialty called “psychiatric genetics.”  This field was a merger of psychiatry and eugenics (also known as “race purification,” “race hygiene,” or “race betterment”) developed in London’s Galton Laboratory and its offshoots, the Eugenics Societies in England and the United States.  The Rockefeller Foundation also created and its executives directed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munich and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity.  The fascist Swiss psychiatrist, Dr. Ernst Rudin, and his protégés, Otmar Freiherr von Verscheuer and Franz J. Kallmann, also directed these institutions.  Chaitkin describes the trans-national activities of the international elite during this time as follows:

A British medical historian friendly to the Rockefellers recently explained how the family was introduced into this field in Germany:  The foundation’s “German centers combined the search for organic signs of mental illness with eugenic projects…. The [Kraepelin, later Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry] institute had initially been endowed with 11 million marks, contributed by Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach [head of the Krupp steel and arms family] and James Loeb [Paul Warburg’s brother-in-law], an expatriate American of the Kuhn- Loeb banking family.  Loeb mobilized his American-Jewish friends to support the institute,” and they invited the foundation to reorganize and expand the Munich enterprise.   Loeb’s relatives, the Warburgs, owners of Kuhn Loeb bank, were the intimate banking partners of William Rockefeller. 

Together with him they had set up the Harriman family in big business, using capital supplied by the British royal family’s personal banker, Sir Ernst Cassell.  The three families, Rockefeller, Warburg, and Harriman, together with British Crown agencies, jointly sponsored much of the social engineering enterprise we shall describe here.  The Rockefeller Foundation made an initial grant of $2.5 million in 1925 to the Psychiatric Institute in Munich, gave it $325,000 for a new building in 1928, and continuously sponsored the institute and its Nazi chief Rudin through the Hitler era.  The foundation paid for a 1930-35 anthropological survey of the “eugenically worthwhile population” by Nazi eugenicists Rudin, Verschuer, Eugen Fischer, and others.

In this manner, the eugenics movement established in Britain and the United States became national policy in Hitler’s Germany.  Rockefeller family psychologists and “race purification experts” created the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation as a medical-research funding conduit.  The Macy Group was directed by former “Black Chamber” spy and military intelligence chief, Gen. Marlborough Churchill, and it managed London’s most advanced experiments in mind-control and social engineering(italics mind, ETK).  The British-led eugenics movement met at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.  Rockefeller’s Dr. Ernst Rudin became president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation.  At the time, the movement called for the killing or sterilization of individuals whose heredity made them a public burden or a national scapegoat.

Chaitkin (2002) documents that throughout the 1930’s Hitler and his eugenics policies were subsidized by Montagu Norman, the occultist governor of the Bank of England.  In 1934, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry joined the Rockefellers in sponsoring psychiatric genetics under the aegis of research into dementia praecox, or schizophrenia.   (Please recall our discussion of the “double mind” in the last section of this paper.)

The historical connections between Britain, Germany, the U.S., and Scottish Rite Masonry extend back to the American Revolution and Civil War (Chaitkin, 2002):

The highest level of U.S. masonry, the Scottish Rite, was the instrument through which the British Crown had reestablished the loyalty of American masons after the American Revolution.  The northern section of the Rite had rallied the Copperheads against Abraham Lincoln’s Civil War efforts, aiding the Rite’s southern chief Albert Pike in secession and in other British white supremacy projects, such as the Ku Klux Klan.  For eugenics, the British royal family itself was the Rite’s point of reference.  The (Duke of Connaught) son of Queen Victoria and brother of King Edward VII, had been grand master of the United Grand Lodge of England since 1901.  American Masonic leaders referred to the duke as “grand master of the Mother Grand Lodge of Masons of the World.”  The son of a German father (Victoria’s husband, the Coburg Prince Albert), the Duke of Connaught was deeply involved in German affairs and was a patron of Britain’s “New Dark Ages” ultra-racialist elite group based in South Africa. 

Late in 1932, negotiations for Hitler’s takeover of Germany took place at the home of Joachim von Ribbentrop, who, as a traveling teenager, had been adopted into the household of the Duke of Connaught.  Ribbentrop then became the head of Hitler’s foreign intelligence service.  As Hitler’s ambassador to England, Ribbentrop worked in tandem with the leadership of the clique which employed Hitler as a British surrogate to smash up Europe: the Masonic grand master duke and his nephew, the openly Nazi Edward VIII; Bank of England Governor Montagu Norman; and Lord Halifax, Neville Chamberlain’s foreign minister.

Thus, we see that mainly through the influence of secret societies and personal ties of individuals within the ruling elite, both the German and U.S. governments were puppets of British/Masonic policy during the decade leading up to World War II.  Chaitkin (2002) continues:

In 1936, the Scottish Rite’s Field Representative of Research on Dementia Praecox (schizophrenia), Dr. Nolan D.C. Lewis, director of the New York State Psychiatric Institute, reported to the Scottish Rite Northern Supreme Council “on the progress of the fourteen research projects being financed by the Supreme Council.”   Scottish Rite strategist, Winfred Overholser, the superintendent of St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, a federal mental hospital in Washington D.C., provided overall leadership for the Rite’s psychiatric research.  Though these projects are shrouded in mystery, one of them with particularly gruesome results has come to light.  The study of hereditary degeneracy was proceeding in the Rockefeller Foundation’s German enclaves when it hit a snag.

Psychiatrist Franz J. Kallmann, protege of Nazi race science chief Ernst Rudin, was forced to leave his job— Kallmann was “half-Jewish.”  This was a big blow for Kallmann, who had proved his Nazi credentials at the International Congress for Population Science in Berlin in 1935.  At that British-led meeting hosted by Hitler’s Interior Ministry, Kallmann had argued for the sterilization of even the apparently healthy relatives of schizophrenics, along with the schizophrenics themselves, to securely eliminate all the defective germ plasm.  Without missing a step, Kallmann emigrated to America and became director of research in the New York State Psychiatric Institute, attached to Columbia University in Manhattan.  The Scottish Rite’s Dr. Lewis was the director of the institute.  Kallmann simply continued in New York the Nazi propaganda work he had been doing for Rockefeller in Germany.  The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry paid Kallmann to conduct a study of over 1, 000 cases of schizophrenia, in order to assert the claim that the mental disorder was inherited. 

Kallmann’s study was published simultaneously in the United States and Nazi Germany in 1938.  In the preface, Kallmann thanked the Scottish Rite and his mentor Rudin.  He called schizophrenics a “source of maladjusted crooks … and the lowest types of criminal offenders.  Even the faithful believer in liberty … would be happier without those.”   He declared sarcastically: “I am reluctant to admit the necessity of different eugenic programs for democratic and fascistic communities…. There are neither biological nor sociological differences between a democratic and a totalitarian schizophrenic.”

Kallmann’s scholarly American study was used by the Nazi government’s T4 unit as a part of its pretext to begin in 1939 the murder of mental patients and various other “defective” people, many or most of them children.  Lethal gas and lethal injections were used to kill 200-250,000 under this program, in which the staffs for a broader program of mass murder were desensitized and trained.

The German chemical company I.G. Farben and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of New Jersey were effectively a single firm, merged in hundreds of cartel arrangements.  I.G. Farben was led, up until 1937, by the Warburg family, Rockefeller’s partners in banking and in the design of Nazi German eugenics.  Following the Nazi invasion of Poland in September 1939, Britain and Germany declared war on each other and World War II began.  But later that month, Standard Oil executives flew to the Netherlands on a British Royal Air Force bomber and met with I.G. Farben executives.

Standard Oil pledged to keep the merger with I.G. Farben going even if the United States entered the war.  This was exposed in 1942 by Sen. Harry Truman’s investigating committee, and President Franklin Roosevelt took hundreds of legal measures during the war to counter the Standard Oil-I.G. Farben cartel’s supply operation for the enemy war machine.

In 1940-41, I.G. Farben built a gigantic factory at Auschwitz in Poland, to utilize the Standard Oil-I.G. Farben patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal.  The SS guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for I.G. Farben slave labor.  Standard Oil-Germany President Emil Helfferich testified after the war that Standard Oil funds helped pay for the SS guards at Auschwitz.  On March 26, 1940, six months after the Standard Oil-I.G. Farben meeting, European Rockefeller Foundation official Daniel O’Brian wrote to the foundation’s chief medical officer Alan Gregg that “it would be unfortunate if it was chosen to stop research which has no relation to war issues.” The “non-war- related” research continued.  (The Rockefeller Foundation defends its record by claiming that its funding of Nazi German programs during World War II was limited to psychiatric research.)


In 1943, Otmar Verschuer’s assistant, Josef Mengele, was made medical commandant of Auschwitz.  As wartime director of Rockefeller’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity in Berlin, Verschuer secured funds for Mengele’s experiments at Auschwitz from the German Research council.  Verschuer wrote a progress report to the Council: “My co-researcher in this research is my assistant, the anthropologist and physician Mengele.  He is serving as camp doctor in the concentration camp Auschwitz…. With the permission of the Reichsfuhrer SS

Himmler, anthropological research is being undertaken on the various racial groups in the concentration camps and blood samples will be sent to my laboratory for investigation.”  Mengele prowled the railroad cars coming into Auschwitz, looking for twin children—a favorite research subject of Frankenstein-type psychiatric geneticists.  On arrival at Mengele’s experimental station, twins filled out “a detailed questionnaire from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.”  There were daily drawings of blood for Verschuer’s “specific protein” research.  Needles were injected into eyes for work on eye color. There were experimental blood transfusions and experimental infections.  Organs and limbs were removed, sometimes without anesthetics.  Sex changes were attempted.  Females were sterilized, males were castrated.  Thousands were murdered, and their organs, eyeballs, heads, and limbs were sent to Verschuer and the Rockefeller group at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.  

After the war, Mengele was a famous target of Nazi-hunters pursuing him to South America.  But his boss, Verschuer, was regarded in a different light:  He was a high-level Rockefeller operative.   In 1946, Verschuer wrote to the Bureau of Human Heredity in London, asking for help in continuing his “scientific research.“   In 1947, the Bureau of Human Heredity moved from London to Copenhagen, and Verschuer moved to Denmark to join the British group there.  The new Danish building for this group was erected with Rockefeller money.   The first International Congress in Human Genetics following World War II was held at this Danish institute in 1956.   Dr. Kallmann helped save Verschuer by testifying at his denazification proceedings.   Kallmann, a director of the American Eugenics Society, became an icon at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, which remains to this day a nest of the Eugenics Society.   With Verschuer and other Nazi notables, Dr. Kallmann also created the American Society of Human Genetics, which organized the “Human Genome Project”—a current $3 billion physical multiculturalism effort.

The foregoing discussion reveals again how the “World Order” has utilized nations, institutions, and individuals to advance its covert agendas.  And it reveals that amongst these agendas are eugenics and mind control research and the creation of a “master race” (or “slave race?”).  In Part VI, we shall also see that mind control has its roots in supra-national occult organizations and has a secret history that probably goes back thousands of years.

In The World Order, A Study of the Hegemony of Parasitism, Mullins (1985) states:

Hitler failed to comprehend the depravity of the behind the scenes figures of the World Order who had gained control of the British Empire with the South Africa wealth they had won in the Boer Wars (1880-81 and 1899-1902).  This hoard of gold and diamonds represented the greatest influx of new purchasing power into Europe since the Spanish galleons brought in the gold of the Incas.  The resistance encountered in this war caused the planners to resolve that in the future, wars would be managed as precisely as any other business operation.  Their philosophy of Hegelian determination called for setting up two opposing forces, thesis and anti-thesis, which would be thrown against each other in conflict to produce an outcome, synthesis.

Between the two World Wars, it was necessary to rearm Germany, and also to back a German Government strong enough to prepare the nation for another war.  The same people who had supplied Germany from 1916 to 1918 in order to keep World War I going now backed the Nazis to produce a Second World War. 

“The World Order” identified in the above passage is, of course, the same behind-the-scenes, all-powerful group that Maj.-Gen. Cherep-Spiridovich (1926) refers to as the “Secret World Government” or “The Hidden Hand.”   Chaitkin (2002) identifies several of the groups most involved in conducting this covert mind control research.  These groups include the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Scottish Rite Masons, and the CIA, as well as numerous other agencies:

A behavior control research project was begun in the 1950s, coordinated by the British psychological warfare unit called the Tavistock Institute, with the Scottish Rite Masons, the Central Intelligence Agency, and other British, U.S., Canadian, and United Nations agencies.   The project became famous in the 1970s under a CIA code name, MK-Ultra.  Its notoriety for brainwashing by drugs, hypnosis, electroshock, and other tortures caused many books to be written about the project, and the U.S. Senate conducted hearings which exposed many of its abusive features.  President Gerald Ford appointed a commission headed by Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, to correct the CIA’s misconduct.   There was a widespread anti-establishment view at the time, that here was the fox appointed to guard the hen house.

The intelligence agencies offered a public rationale for the project:  the need to counteract and compete with the mind-control capabilities of the communists.  This was largely based on the fact that U.S. personnel held prisoner by the enemy in the Korean War had signed false confessions of crimes, and some had defected to North Korea, the apparent result of brainwashing.   (ETK note:  This “cover story,” that the U.S. had to “keep up with the communists” for “national security” reasons was later disproven.  The U.S. research in mind control was always well ahead of the research in the communist nations.)

The Manchurian Candidate (Condon, 1959), a 1959 book which was made into a popular movie in 1962, reflected this rationale.  It told the story of a communist plot to use a U.S. soldier brainwashed in Manchuria as a zombie-assassin, to kill the leading U.S. presidential candidate.  A central theme of MK-Ultra was to attempt to control the human mind in a similar way.

Threatened and accomplished assassination of political leaders has become increasingly frequent in public life since the 1960s.

……the overall project, including MK-Ultra, has been foreign-sponsored and anti-American in its purposes.

We shall outline here the British background of this deeply criminal enterprise, with its roots in the political and psychiatric movement called eugenics.

John D. Rockefeller created the family-run Rockefeller Foundation, in parallel with the birth of the British-inspired Federal Reserve, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  In 1909-13 and subsequent years, Rockefeller transferred blocs of the family-owned Standard Oil Co. worth more than $300 million to the account of the foundation under its trustees who were family members, and their employees.  Thus was established a global instrument for radical social change, using American money and British strategy.

In Part IV of this series we identified the “higher powers” behind these activities and their long-term game plan.  A more detailed examination of the institutions and structures of the world’s secret government is warranted and is offered here.  It is a bit like peeling back layers of an onion.

B.  The Committee of 300 

The degree of coordination of individuals, programs, secret societies and governments suggested in the foregoing discussion is hard to explain unless there exists some kind of “supra-national governing body.”  In his book, A Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 (2006a), Dr. John Coleman identifies and describes just such a body:

The 300 men of the Committee of 300 still rule the world with an iron fist.  Their wealth is untold; it cannot be measured.  These people are so wealthy that they would make David Rockefeller look like a piker.

Former British intelligence officer, Dr. John Coleman (2006a)

In Part III of this series, we found that the Committee of 300 plays a pivotal role in the Illuminati organizational structure (Figure 1).


Figure 1.  Hierarchy of organizations controlled by the Committee of 300, a high-level component of the Illuminati structure (adapted from Coleman, 2006a).

The Committee of 300 developed out of the British East India Company (BEIC), which was founded by the British aristocracy in 1727 (Coleman, 2006a).  The parent company of BEIC, The London Mercers Company, was granted a charter by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600.  Coleman outlines other historical/political/economic connections as follows:

In this grouping is found the Black Nobility banking families of Venice and Genoa.   Among these family names is “Sebastian Cabot,” the ancestor of the Eastern (U.S.) Liberal Establishment’s Cabot family….

The common denominator was the thread that ran through the East India Company connecting it to the Black Nobility and the Levant Traders; their adoption of the Indian merchant banking system based on the Babylonian fractional reserve banking system and run by the Saint Simonite Socialists, together with the Indian Mercantile Finance upper class; its transport to England, the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, and the Rothschild connection, the Anglo-Boer War, WWI, and the (creation of) the Russian (Bolshevik) Revolution and onwards:  A determination to seize the assets and raw materials of nations possessing such natural resources had begun in India, China, and South Africa, falling victim to the BEIC (British East India Company).   Its leaders demonstrated a blinding unremitting hatred of Christianity, the Muslim religion, and in fact all religions other than those of which they claimed a “higher knowledge.”  

Above, Coleman does not mention the most important group of “controllers” except in passing.  We can surmise their identity, however, by asking which group has historically evidenced and continues to demonstrate a “blinding unremitting hatred of Christianity, the Muslim religion, and all religions other than those of which they claimed a higher knowledge?”  The answer, as demonstrated in Part IV and throughout this paper, is to be found in the organized and subversive netherworld of Judeo-Masonic occultism and Satanism.

Although Coleman (2006a) is cautious about naming this group, he does relate how and when he discovered “the Hierarchy’s” practice of infiltrating all institutional levels in order to control them:

I remember looking through a stack of old newspapers at the British Museum where I spent five years doing in-depth research.  The papers covered the years 1912 to 1920.  I recall thinking, at the time:  “Isn’t it amazing that the rush to the New World Order Socialist totalitarian government should be led by the United States, supposedly a bastion of freedom?”

Then, as I recall, it came to me with great clarity that the Committee of 300 has its people at the highest and lowest echelons embedded in the U.S., in banking, industry, trade, defense, the State Department, and indeed the very White House, not to mention the Elite Club called the U.S. Senate, which in my view is a forum for pushing the New World Order.   

Control of society, then, by the Committee of 300 and the Illuminati is based on their: 1) extraordinary wealth, 2) vast network of secret societies, 3) practice of “infiltrating and controlling” existing institutions, and 4) practice of establishing and controlling new institutions and fronts to advance their agendas.  Assuming we inhabit the same planet, the Committee of 300 must be an important component of and key player for the “International Jewish Conspiracy.”

Coleman (2006a) notes that the Committee of 300 directly controls the following institutions:  The Agency for International Development, Anti-Defamation League, Aspen Institute of Colorado, Atlantic Richfield, British Petroleum, various Royal Families (Saudi, Kuwait, Jordan), London Times, ACLU, Bilderberg Group, British East India Company, TIME magazine, RCA, Warner Brothers, Fox News, Cathedral of St. John the Divine, CIA, Council on Foreign Relations, Club of Rome, Fabian Society, Ford Foundation, Federation of American Zionists, Harvard University, Institute for Policy Studies, Knights of Malta, London School of Economics,  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NAACP, National Council of Churches, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Princeton University, Rand Corporation, Royal Institute for International Affairs, Stanford Research Institute (SRI), Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Trilateral Commission, and the World Council of Churches.

According to Coleman, the Committee of 300 formed the Britain’s intelligence services, MI5 and MI6, and then through them, the CIA, Mossad (Israel’s intelligence service), and other national intelligence agencies.   Wheeler and Springmeier (1997) state it more simply:  “The intelligence networks were started by and run by theIlluminati. They are Illuminati fronts.”

Current and former members of the Committee of 300 includes many of the world’s richest, most powerful, and most famous individuals:  Warren Buffet, former President George H.W. Bush, Winston Churchill, the King of Norway, the Queen of England, Colonel Mandel House (advisor to President Woodrow Wilson), author Aldous Huxley, economist John Maynard Keynes, Henry Kissinger, journalist Walter Lippman, British geographer and geopolitician, Halford Mackinder, John J. McCloy (of Yale’s “Skull and Bones” Society), Master Mason Giuseppe Mazzini, Andrew Mellon, Lord Alfred Milner (founder of the British Round Table groups), French President Francois Mitterand, American banker J.P. Morgan, British banker Montague Norman, Club of Rome founder Aurellio Pecci, Peter G. Peterson, Prince Phillip (the Duke of Edinburgh), Gifford Pinchot (founder of U.S. Forest Service), Sir John Rawlings Reese (first Director of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations), English-born gold and diamond-magnate Cecil John Rhodes, David Rockefeller, Baron Edmond de Rothschild, Sir Bertrand Russell, George Schultz, Ted Turner, Cyrus Vance, Earl Warren (of the Warren Commission), Sydney Webb (founder of British Fabian Society), British author H.G. Wells, and, of course, the Honorable Maurice Strong (Coleman, 2006a).

The fact that Maurice Strong is a member of the Committee of 300  certainly helps explain his extraordinary power and the tremendous breadth and scope of his (often seemingly contradictory) activities.  This and many other connections strongly suggest that the “mission” of the “Refuge of World Truths” in Crestone/Baca may not be as benign as portrayed in publications such as the Crestone magazine.  However, we also hold that as a possibility as well.

Coleman (2006a) documents the now familiar occult/religious nature of the Committee of 300, asserting that Committee of 300 members believe they are above God and indeed, refer to themselves as “The Olympians,” “Mariah Conquering Wind,” the “Cult of Dionysius,” the “Cult of Isis,” the “Cult of Catharsis,” “Gnostics,” and “Bogomils.”  Current and past projects of the Committee of 300 have included control of British imperial rule through their control of the British East India Companyand their engineering of the “Opium Wars” of China, and the Boer Wars in South Africa.  According to Coleman, they orchestrated World War I, the eugenics movement, and World War II, and are behind the ongoing “colonial” wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They engineered the drug and “counter-cultural” revolution in America in the 1960’s and still control the world’s illegal drug trade.

Through its control of the British government, in particular, the Committee of 300 established the Tavistock Institute of Human RelationsThe Club of Rome, and hundreds or thousands of other “think tanks.”  “They” also engineered the Kennedy assassination and control the White House to this day.

C.  The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations:  The “World’s Pre-eminent Brainwashing Institute” and the “Center of the Global Mind-Control Network”

The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations had its beginnings at Wellington House, in London, in 1913 (The Tavistock Institute for Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political, and Economic Decline of the United States of America, Coleman, 2006b).  The goal at that time was to develop a propaganda strategy that would overcome the (British) public’s reluctance to going to war with Germany prior to World War I.  Funding for the project came from the British Royal Family, the Milner Group, and the Rothschild and Rockefeller families, among others.  Tavistock’s staff at that time included British historian Arnold Toynbee, American journalist Walter Lippmann (Committee of 300), and American psychiatrist, Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud.  The project was approved by “the Olympians,” the inner core of The Committee of 300.


Figure 2.  From left to right:  Brigadier General John Rawlings Reese, first director of the Tavistock Institute, Edward Bernays, father of modern propaganda, Sigmund Freud, father of modern psycho-analysis, American Journalist Walter Lipmann, and British historian Arnold Toynbee.

In 1921, The Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavsitock, donated a building for the institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers.  The project was set up to determine the “breaking point” of men under stress and was under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare commanded by Brigadier General Sir John Rawlings-Reese.  The purpose of the research was to understand how human minds are shattered so that Tavistock “scientists” could utilize similar techniques to shatter and control the “public mind.”  The Tavistock Clinic was founded in London as a psychological warfare research center in 1922.

ETK note:  This segment of the paper and Part VI demonstrate that virtually every form of mind-control, whether designed to control individuals or the masses, incorporates this fundamentally malevolent intent and incorporates the view that human beings are mere “objects,” “insects” or “lab rats” to be experimented upon, tortured, and ultimately, controlled and/or disposed of.  These kinds of “research” and “experiments” often involve crimes against (often unwitting) individuals and humanity and violate the most basic human rights that are protected by the Nuremburg Code.  Conducted in many countries, including Germany, England, the Soviet Union, Canada, and the United States (among others), these experiments and programs have been shrouded in utmost secrecy.  In the U.S., they are still officially justified and protected under the rubric of “National Security.”  However, due to their criminal nature, all these activities need to be exposed and the scientists and government officials involved need to be brought to justice, regardless of their rank or wealth.

Coleman (2006b) documents that the Tavistock Institute is the central body responsible for the oversight of a global mind control network.  In its multi-faceted activities, the institute is implementing its fundamental insight: that by means of applying repeated shocks, or stressful events, entire populations can be manipulated,  conditioned, terrorized, and subdued.  This is achievable by manufacturing a controlled psychological environment.

In 1946, the Tavistock Institute was created as an independent body to assist the Tavistock Clinic.  It was formally founded and registered as a charity (!) in 1947.  A high percentage of British (and American) psychologists, corporate CEOs, social workers, and police, among others, are trained at Tavistock to this day.  And today, theTavistock Institute claims to be the authority on ritual abuse, Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) and Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID).   Thus, Tavistock, the primary mind-control and mind-programming site in the world, pretends to be trying to solve the very problems it covertly creates!

Psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud (Nazi sympathizer, cocaine addict, and sexual deviant) was Tavistock’s first main prophet.  Princess Bonaparte donated a mansion to Freud when he resettled from Germany to England.  Edward Bernays, Freud’s nephew and another Tavistock psychologist, wrote the book, Propaganda (1928) and pioneered the (mis)use of psychology to shape public opinion so that the public would believe that state-manufactured opinions are, in fact, their own.

In Propaganda (1928), Bernays stated:

If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without them knowing it…

As civilization becomes more complex and as the need for invisible government has been increasingly demonstrated, the technical means have been invented and developed by which public opinion may be regimented.  With printing press and newspaper, the telephone, telegraph, radio and airplanes, ideas can be spread rapidly, and even instantaneously, across the whole of America.  The conscious and intelligent manipulation of organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society.  Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power in our country.

Bernays boasted that these new powers of media propaganda would allow elites to have far better control of the masses:

We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.  Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it is remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons, a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million, who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses.  It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.

Tavistock’s pioneering work in the “science” of mass mind control also helped establish it as the world center of “foundation ideology.”  Thus, Tavistock “scientists” helped the Rockefellers and other extremely wealthy American “robber barons” design their tax-exempt foundations in such a way that they could simultaneously preserve their vast fortunes and mold American and British societies through the new techniques of “social engineering.”   In turn, the CIA, in particular, has been instrumental in ensuring that Tavistock-generated foundation ideologies are translated into policy implementation by the executive, the legislative, and judicial branches of the United States government.

In The World Order:  A Study of The Hegemony of Parasitism (1985), Mullins devotes a chapter to the formation of the CIA.  Mullins explains:

The CIA has often been called the Central Investment Agency, not only because of the Wall Street backgrounds of Donovan, Dulles and many other principals, but because of the many commercial operations in which it has engaged (the CIA is always referred to, not by accident, by its insiders, as “the company”).  A great deal of stock trading is based upon inside CIA information, buying and selling on the basis of secret intelligence gathered by the CIA all over the world.

The CIA has also spent billions to influence foreign elections, always for the candidates inimical to the interests of the people of the United States, but dedicated to the program of the World Order.  However, its principle influence has been through its control of foundations and universities.  The American people remain blissfully unaware that their Constitutional government with its separate powers of legislative, judicial, and executive departments, has been entirely superseded by the foundations, which generate basic policy for all three branches.  Monetary policy is generated by the Brookings Institution and implemented through the Federal Reserve System independent of Congress, which has constitutional power to regulate the monetary system.  Social policies, originated by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, are enacted into law by Congress and upheld against all challenges by the Supreme Court.  Foreign policy, a prerogative of the executive branch, is entirely based on foundation “studies” and recommendations.  Staffs of all three departments are heavily infiltrated by foundation operatives.  The CIA functions as the coordinating agency between the foundations and the departments of government.

In “The Tavistock Institute: The Holographic Matrix,” Merlintm provides these additional historical connections:

In 1938, Franklin Delano Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Prime Minister Winston Churchill, which in effect ceded United States sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executives control United States policies.  To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up the Office of Strategic Services (or ‘OSS’ – which later became the CIA) under the aegis of SOE/SIS (Special Operations Executives/Secret Intelligence Service). “Secret Intelligence Service” (SIS) is now known as MI6.

The CIA (formerly ‘OSS’) has always operated under specific guidelines from Tavistock.

D.  Philosophic Underpinnings of Tavistock:  Dr. Kurt Lewin, the Frankfurt School, and “the Long March of Cultural Marxism”

Another important early Tavistock figure was psychologist and Polish/German/American Jew, Dr. Kurt Lewin.  Lewin personally brought the neo-Marxist ideologies of the German “Frankfurt School” to the Tavistock Institute and then to a host of institutions in the United States.  Wikipedia says this about Lewin:

Lewin often associated with the early Frankfurt School, originated by an influential group of largely Jewish Marxists at the Institute for Social Research in Germany.  But when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the Institute members had to disband, moving to England and then to America.  In that year, he met with Eric Trist of the London Tavistock Clinic.  Trist was impressed with his theories and went on to use them in his studies on soldiers during the Second World War.

Lewin emigrated to the United States in August 1933 and became a naturalized citizen in 1940.  Earlier, he had spent six months as a visiting professor atStanford in 1930, but on his immigration to the United States, Lewin worked at Cornell University and for the Iowa Child Welfare Research Station at theUniversity of Iowa.  Later, he went on to become director of the Center for Group Dynamics at MIT.  While working at MIT in 1946, Lewin received a phone call from the Director of the Connecticut State Inter Racial Commission requesting help to find an effective way to combat religious and racial prejudices.  He set up a workshop to conduct a ‘change’ experiment, which laid the foundations for what is now known as sensitivity training.   In 1947, this led to the establishment of the National Training Laboratories, at BethelMaine.  Carl Rogers believed that sensitivity training is “perhaps the most significant social invention of this century.”

Lewin’s personal connection to Germany’s neo-Marxist “Frankfurt School” is worth exploring further.  In “The Frankfurt School and “Critical Theory”” (, we read:

The “Frankfurt School”, or Institute for Social Research, was set up by a group of Marxist intellectuals in Germany in 1923, affiliated to the University of Frankfurt and independently of the Communist Party, which has been influential in the development of Marxist theory ever since.  The founding of the Institut marked the beginning of a current of “Marxism” divorced from the organized working class and Communist Parties, which over the decades merged with bourgeois ideology in academia….Other young German Communist intellectuals who were associated with the Institut, but after the Nazi takeover, wound up in the United States, were Kurt Lewin and Adolph Löwe.

They all went on to make significant contributions to social theory, though only distantly related to their initial Communist inspirations.  Kurt Lewin for instance contributed to the emergence of group-dynamics and social action theory as specialized disciplines…..

Thus, from the beginning of his career, Lewin was a Marxist and a communist.  In “The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt” (2009, ), Timothy Matthews states:


….  the corrosive work of the ‘Frankfurt School’ – a group of German-American scholars who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber.  Not that their idea of a ‘cultural revolution’ was particularly new.  ‘Until now’, wrote Joseph Comte de Maistre (1753-1821) who for fifteen years was a Freemason, ‘nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion:  But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is.’

What was the Frankfurt School?  Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States.  But it did not do so.  Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what were the reasons.  On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organized at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution.  Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I; a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ – sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to ‘organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.)

 ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.’

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the 5th Comintern Congress, Lukacs moved to Germany, where he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist-oriented sociologists, a gathering that was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.

This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung.  To begin with, school and institute were indistinguishable.  In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975).


Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations.  But in 1930, Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research.  When Hitler came to power, the Institut was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for license cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas – possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.  Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy.  To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order.  Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.

2. Continual change to create confusion

3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority

5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

6. The promotion of excessive drinking

7. Emptying of churches

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime

9. Dependency on the state or state benefits

10. Control and dumbing down of media

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women.  To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.

• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces

• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’


Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural.  Cultural revolution demolishes from within.  ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

Thus, throughout his career in Germany, at Tavistock, and in the U.S., Lewin helped to implement these Frankfurt School goals.  The strategy he implemented was also known as “cultural hegemony” that was to be established incrementally by the “long march (of Marxist ideology) through the institutions,” as articulated and advocated by Jewish Italian communist, Antonio Gramski.

In “Cultural Marxism” (2007) ( ), Linda Kimball observes:

Separately, two Marxist theorists-Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary (later of the Frankfurt School)-concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order.  The West would have to be conquered first.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class.  The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a “long march through the culture.”  Additionally, a new proletariat must be created.  In his “Prison Notebooks,” he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history.  All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary.  He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary.  Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow.  Lukacs launched a radical sex education program in the schools.  Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority.   All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.

Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.

Gramsci’s prescription and Lukacs’ plans were the precursor to what Cultural Marxism in the guise of SIECUS, GSLEN, and the ACLU–acting as judicially-powered enforcers–later brought into American schools.


In 1923, the Frankfurt School-a Marxist think-tank-was founded in Weimar Germany.  Among its founders were Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse, and Theodor Adorno.  The school was a multidisciplinary effort which included sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms.  It would provide the ideas on which to base a new political theory of revolution based on culture, harnessing new oppressed groups for the faithless proletariat.  Smashing religion, morals, it would also build a constituency among academics, who could build careers studying and writing about the new oppression.

Toward this end, Marcuse-who favored “polymorphous perversion” – expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals.  Into this was spliced Lukac’s radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics.  Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques.  The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism.

Additional intellectual firepower was required: a theory to pathologize what was to be destroyed.  In 1950, the Frankfurt School augmented Cultural Marxism with Theodor Adorno’s idea of the ‘authoritarian personality.’  This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism.  Thus, anyone who upholds America’s traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist.  Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists.  By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America’s traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help.

Wikepedia states this about Antonio Gramsci’s philosophy:

“Cultural hegemony” is the philosophic and sociologicaltheory, by the Marxist philosopherAntonio Gramsci, which proposes that a culturally diverse society can be dominated (ruled) by one social class, whose dominance is achieved by manipulating the societal culture (beliefsexplanationsperceptionsvaluesmores) so that its ruling-class worldview (Weltanschauung) is imposed as the societal norm, which every social class then perceives as a universally valid ideology that justifies the social, political, and economic status quo — as natural, inevitable, and beneficial for everyone, rather than as artificial social constructs that benefit only the ruling class.

Of course, the very term “cultural hegemony” begs the question:  “Hegemony of what culture?”  Lewin, Gramsci, Freud, Bernays, Lucacs, Marx, and all the main members of the Frankfurt School are Jews.  Recall our earlier discussion of Theodor Herzl’s definition of a nation:  The Jewish nation is united against its common enemy- all non-Jews.

Back to Dr. Kurt Lewin’s career:  In 1933, Lewin infiltrated into the United States as a “German Jewish refugee” and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which developed the propaganda campaign that successfully turned the American public against Germany, allowing for American participation in WWII.  Lewin also helped found and/or staff a whole series of Tavistock spin-off institutes, including The Stanford Research Institute, Rand Corporation, MIT, the Committee on National Morale, The National Institute for Mental Health, the National Resources Defense Council, the National Training Laboratories, the FBI, the CIA, and many other institutions (Coleman, 2006b).

how-they-control-us_clip_image002_0001how-they-control-us_clip_image004_0001 how-they-control-us_clip_image006_0000how-they-control-us_clip_image008_0000how-they-control-us_clip_image010_0000

Figure 3.  From left to right: Dr. Kurt Lewin, Jewish German psychologist and director of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations; Antonio Gramski, Jewish Italian political philosopher, George Lucacs of the Frankfurt School, Karl Marx, co-author of The Communist Manifesto, and Bertrand Russell, British philosopher, mathematician, “antagonistic atheist,” and member of the Committee of 300.

Coleman (2006b) notes that historian Oscar Spengler accurately summarized Tavistock’s modus operandi in his book, The Decline of the West (1937).  Coleman (2006b) paraphrases Spengler’s prediction as follows:

Alien elements would be introduced into Western civilization in increasing numbers, and the West would fail at that time to expel the aliens, thereby sealing its fate… and thus, Western civilization would fall by the wayside, in the manner of the ancient civilizations of Greece and Rome…. The planners at Tavistock saw that the way to upset the balance of Western civilization was to force unwelcome changes in the race by removing control from the deserving to the undeserving in the manner of ancient Roman leaders who were supplanted by their servants and aliens, whom they had permitted to come and dwell among them.

Thus we see that today, Tavistock’s network of spin-off and allied institutions extends from the University of Sussex in Britain to the United States through theStanford Research Institute (SRI), Esalen, MIT, Brookings Institution, National Training Laboratories, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown (where State Department personnel are trained), U.S. Air Force Intelligence, the Wharton School of Finance, and the Rand and Mitre corporations, etc.  Corporate leaders are typically required to undergo indoctrination at one or more Tavistock-controlled institutions.  A complex network of secret groups (secret societies), including the Mont Pelerin Society, The Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and The Club of Rome, is a conduit for delivering instructions to theTavistock network (see Figure 1 in Parts II and III of this paper).  Through the Stanford Research Institute, for example, Tavistock controls the National Education Association.

The bottom line, as Coleman (2006b) asserts below, is that Tavistock has been conducting covert psychological war against the civilian population of the United States since at least 1946!:

World War II provided the emerging Tavistock Social sciences scientists with enormous scope for experimentation.  Lewin’s leadership put together the key-force that would deploy after World War II to utilize those techniques developed in warfare against the population of the United States.  In fact, in 1946, Tavistock declared war on the civilian population of the United States and has remained in a state of war ever since.

In “The Tavistock Institute: The Holographic Matrix,” Merlintm elaborates:

All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal—to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the New World Order.  Any technique which helps to break down the family unit and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism, and sexual behavior, is used by Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control.  The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce *permanent mental illness* in those who undergo this treatment, by destabilizing their character.  The victim is then advised to “establish new rituals of personal interaction,” which they define as indulging in brief sexual encounters, which set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family.

The Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the United States that no one can achieve prominence in any field, unless that person receives special training in “behavioral science” – either at Tavistock – or at one of its sanctioned subsidiaries.

Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a (Jewish) German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF.  Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S., solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland.

The “experiment” in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations.  The program was designed to break down the individual’s sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage.  Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association!  The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brainwashes leading executives of business and government.

Nazi murderers hiding behind globalist anonymity at the Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids that were ruthlessly carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill, for what they considered to be “clinical experiments in mass terror” with expendable collateral damage, keeping detailed records of the results as they observed their unwilling *human* guinea pigs reacting under “controlled laboratory conditions”!

A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy – the use of drugs.   Roosevelt’s adviser, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg, who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to “promote the drug” (LSD).  The result was the LSD “counter-culture” of the 1960s, the “student revolution”, financed with $25 million dollars from the CIA!

One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund.  The CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control.   In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada.  Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association, and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions.  The patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments.  One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S. companies who provided the drug for the CIA.  All the records of the CIA’s drug testing program were ordered destroyed by the head of MK Ultra (Dr. Sidney Gottleib in 1973).

Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent.  R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post, August 20, 1984, cites the “squalid consequences of the 60’s radicals in SDS”, as resulting in “the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness” in this country and throughout the world.

This is the “legacy” of the Warburgs and the CIA.  Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protege of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation.  Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy’s personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963, funded Students for Democratic Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture.

The “tax exempt” Tavistock Institute currently operates a staggering $6 billion dollar per year network of foundations within the United States – ALL of it funded by taxpayer money.

Ten major institutions are under Tavistock’s direct control – with 400 subsidiaries and 3,000 study groups and a variety of private think tanks, which conceive many of the psychological programs to exert even more control of the New World Order over the American populace.

The Stanford Research Institute (SRI), which adjoins the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million dollar a year operation with 3,300 employees.  It conducts program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA.  SRI is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting “mind control” and the “behavioral” sciences.

One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is The Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957.  The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance (former Secretary of State and director of the Rockefeller Foundation) and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

E.  The “Vision” of Scientific Dictatorship to Serve World Government

In 1931, Committee of 300-member Bertrand Russell outlined his vision of that the world would be governed by a “scientific dictatorship” in his essay, “The Scientific Outlook”.

The society of experts which I am imagining will embrace all eminent men of science except a few wrong-headed and anarchical cranks.  It will possess the sole up-to-date armaments and will be the repository of all new secrets in the art of war. There will, therefore, be no more war since resistance by the unscientific will be doomed to obvious failure.  The society of experts will control propaganda and education.  It will teach loyalty to the world government and make nationalism high treason.  The government, being an oligarchy, will instill submissiveness into the great bulk of the population, confining initiative and the habit of command to its own members.  It is possible that it may invent ingenious ways of concealing its own power, leaving the forms of democracy intact, and allowing the plutocrats to imagine that they are cleverly controlling these forms.  Gradually, however, as the pluocrats become stupid through laziness, they will lose their wealth; it will pass more and more into public ownership and be controlled by the government of experts.  Thus, whatever the outward forms may be, all real power will come to be concentrated in the hands of those who understand the art of scientific manipulation.

In his 2008 essay: The Rule of the Scientific Expert,” Brent Jessup states ( continues:

This idea of concealing the real power structure from the masses was later described by Bertrand Russell in his book The Impact of Science on Society(1952):

“Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class.  The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.  When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”

F.  The “Holographic Matrix:” Tavistock’s Many Spinoff Organizations

“Merlintm” describes some of Tavistock’s most important spin-off organizations in America in “The Holographic Matrix: Tavistock Institute” (

ARCO (Atlantic Richfield Company):  ARCO keeps popping up during investigations about research on mind control, as well as HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Project). Several men on ARCO’s board of directors have been trained by Tavistock – including Jack Conway, Philip Hawley, and Dr. Joel Fort.

Brookings Institution dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.”  Brookings wrote President Hoover’s program, President Roosevelt’s “New Deal”, President John F. Kennedy’s “New Frontiers” program (deviation from it cost President Kennedy his life), and President Lyndon B. Johnson’s “Great Society.”  Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so.

Esalen Institute, located in Big Sur, California, is the Tavistock of America.  They conduct workshops on hypnosis, biofeedback, witchcraft (for example, their “Rituals of Transformation” class).  Instructors include: witch Margo Adler, Cranio-sacral D.O. Jim Asher, psychologist Adam Burke (who specializes in trance training), Patti Lawrence (who does cranial work), Caroline Muir (a tantric sex yoga expert), Robert Swanson (a Dolphin communication expert), Charles Tart (an expert in altered states of consciousness), Karen Turner (a witch psychologist), & Anna Wise (who is skilled in using EEGs to measure and train brain waves). These are only a few of the many occult instructors that the Esalen Institute has on staff.

Hudson Institute has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any, except the BIG FIVE.  Historically, Hudson specialized in defense policy research and relations with the USSR.  Most of its military work is classified as SECRET.  Hudson may be properly classified as one of the Committee of 300’s “BRAINWASHING” establishments.  One of its largest clients is the U.S. Department of Defense, which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control.

National Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of the Tavistock network in the United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine, NTL had as its explicit purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational institutions, and corporate bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these “leaders” to either themselves run Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly trained group leaders to do the job.

The “nuts and bolts” of the NTL operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as “group dynamics,” developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and whose students founded NTL.  In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities are manipulated by a “group leader” to form a “consensus” of opinion, achieving a new “group identity.”  The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual’s belief structure.  Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is “cracked,” and a new personality emerges with new values.  The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place.   In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim knowing what has taken place.

This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called “sensitivity groups” or “T-groups,” or in the more extreme rock’n-roll-drugs-sex counter-culture form, “touchy-feely groups,” such as the kind popularized from the 1960s onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up with the help of NTL.

From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the nation’s corporate leaderships through such brainwashing programs, while running similar programs for the State Department, the Navy, the Department of Education, and other sections of the federal bureaucracy.  There is no firm estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this process in last 40 years at either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, which is based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training Laboratories in Group

Development, or in various satellite institutions.  The most reliable estimate is in the several millions.

One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States.  Thus, the NEA’s outlook has been “shaped” by Tavistock, through the NTL.

In 1964, the NTL Institute became a direct part of the NEA, with the NTL setting up “group sessions” for all of its affiliates.  With funding from the Department of Education, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the training of the nation’s primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in developing the content of educational “reforms,” including OBE.

Also known as the “International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences”, this institute is a brainwashing center in artificial stress training, whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher group in the United States.

While officially denouncing “racism”, it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate.

University of Pennsylvania – Wharton School of Finance and Commerce(founded by Eric Trist) is of the prominent “brain trusts” of Tavistock.  It has become one of the most important Tavistock brainwashing institutions, insofar as “Behavioral Research” is concerned.   Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor, which teaches how to produce “cooked” statistics at the “Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated”.  This method was very much in demand as we came to the close of 1991, with millions more people out of work than was reflected in the USDL statistics. 

This “institution” has graduated such prominent alums as Donald Trump, a shining testament to the callous and glibly egotistical mercenaries it churns out to do its bidding.  

“Wharton Econometric Forecasting Model” is an intentionally vague pseudo-intellectual title for their method of creating false information, which is currently used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States and Western Europe – as well as by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the World Bank!

Institute for Social Research.Among its clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Postal Service and the U.S. Department of Justice.   Among its studies are “The Human Meaning Of Social Change”, “Youth in Transition” and “How Americans View Their Mental Health”.

Institute For The Future is not a typical Tavistock institution, in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting from the mother of all think tanks.   Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years.  So-called DELPHI PANELS decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to “steer” government in the right direction to head off such groups as “people creating civil disorder.” (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.)

This “institute” recommends action such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage, and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning, and last but most frightening of all – a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas (concentration camp compounds).  As can be observed, many of their goals have already been more than fully realized.

Institute For Policy Studies (IPS).One of the “Big Three”, IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States.   Its networks in America include the League for Industrial Democracy.   Lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy have included Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Irwin Suall of the ADL, Eugene Rostow, Arms control negotiator, Lane Kirkland, Labor Leader, and Albert Shanker.

IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly trained Tavistock Institute graduates.  The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the Tavistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the “New Left” as a grass roots movement in the U.S.It has been documented that Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security Council staff member Halprin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the entire campaign staff of candidate George McGovern.  No scheme was ever considered too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage.

Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its “Big Stick” to beat Congress.  IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently, but in actuality, acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists.   In this way, IPS was, and still is, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for “the trend, the way things are going.”  By using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS is able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works.

IPS became, and remains to this day, one of the most prestigious “think tanks” controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers.

By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as “The Pentagon Papers,” besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial policies under the guise of religion, using establishment media to spread IPS ideas, then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.

Stanford Research Institute (SRI).  Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech, made it clear what lines the institute was going to follow.  Stanford can be described as one of the “jewels” in Tavistock’s crown rule over the United States.  Founded in 1946, immediately after the close of WWII, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control research and “future sciences.” Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation, which developed the “Changing Images of Man”, upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.

The Stanford Research Institute, which adjoins the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million dollar a year operation with 3,300 employees.  It conducts program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA.  SRI is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting “mind control” and the “behavioral” sciences.

Some of Stanford’s major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services.  Applications of Behavioral Sciences, to Research Management Office of Science and Technology.SRI Business Intelligence Program, US Department of Defense, Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering, Office of Aerospace Research

Among corporations seeking Stanford’s services are Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation, Hewlett Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and TRW Company.  One of Stanford’s “secret projects” was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons.

Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller “think tanks” doing research into every facet of life in America.  This is ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country.  At present, Stanford’s computers are linked with 2500 “sister” research consoles, which include the CIA, Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), Rand, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the “library”, cataloging all ARPA documentation.

“Other agencies” … (one can use one’s imagination here) are allowed to search through SRI’s “library” for key words and phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center.  The Pentagon uses SRI’s master files extensively and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon “command and control” problems are worked out by Stanford.While ostensibly, these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not, and will not be turned to civilian applications.  Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone.

Massachusetts Institute Of Technology (MIT) Alfred P. Sloan School Of Management is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock USA.  Most people look upon it as a purely ‘American’ institution, but that is far from the truth.  MIT-Alfred Sloan can be divided into these groups: Contemporary Technology, Industrial Relations, Lewin Group Psychology

NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories, Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology, and Systems Dynamics.

Some of MIT’s clients include:American Management Association, Committee for Economic Development, GTE

Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), NASA, National Academy of Sciences, National Council of Churches, Sylvania, TRW, U.S. Army,

U.S. Department of State, U.S. Navy, U.S. Treasury, and Volkswagen Company.

RAND Research And Development Corporation.  Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA’s (Britain’s Royal Institute for International Affairs) most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level.  Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-ULTRA operation which lasted for 20 years).

Some of RAND’s clients include:American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T), Chase Manhattan Bank, International Business Machines (IBM), Lockheed Martin, National Science Foundation, Republican Party, TRW, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Department of Health, U.S. Department of Energy.

There are literally thousands of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDS’s services.  To list them all would be impossible.  Among RAND’s specialities is a “study group” that predicts the timing and direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out many scenarios based upon its findings.  RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsquently fell victim to scorn poured out by the establishment press.  “Brainwashing” remains the primary function of RAND.

Now we finally can recognize the real character of “the matrix!”

And in these many Tavistock-spinoff organizations, we see the fulfillment of Gramsci’s intended “long march through the institutions.”   According to this web site,  (

Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the USA, that no one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioral science at Tavistock, or one of its subsidiaries.”  Read how Tavistock directs hundreds of elite think tanks and corporations in the United States. The degree of elite coordination is breath taking.

G.  Recent Tavistock Projects in the U.S. Include 911, the War on Terrorism and the Global Warming Fraud

In “War on Terror is Elite Mind Control,” Henry Makow PhD draws out these connections between Tavistock, Dr. Kurt Lewin, and terrorism in modern America:

It is more effective to manage society by mind control than by physical coercion.  The events of 9-11 and the “war on terror” mostly are exercises in mass brainwashing.

German psychiatrist Kurt Lewin, who became director of the elite-sponsored Tavistock Institute in 1932, developed the thinking behind 9-11.   In the book“Mind Control World Control” (1997) Jim Keith writes:

“Lewin is credited with much of the original Tavistock research into mass brainwashing applying the results of repeated trauma and torture [of individuals] in mind control to society at large.”

“If terror can be induced on a widespread basis into a society, Lewin has stated, then society reverts to a “tabula rasa,” a blank slate, a situation where control can easily be instituted from an external point.” 

“Put another way:  By the creation of controlled chaos, the populace can be brought to the point where it willingly submits to greater control.  Lewin maintained that society must be driven into a state equivalent to an ‘early childhood situation.’   He termed this societal chaos ‘fluidity.’” (Page 44) 

Elite planners designed Sept. 11 for its shock value.  In the aftermath, they were able to impose a security crackdown, a costly military build-up and a war in Afghanistan and Iraq on a stunned population.

Keith cites another Tavistock researcher Dr. William Sargent author of “Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brain-Washing” (1957): “Various types of beliefs can be implanted after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by …deliberately induced fear, anger or excitement.”

Most political and cultural events are contrived by the elite for their psychological effect.   JFK could have been disposed of in more humane ways.   (He had many health problems.)  Instead, for its shock value, they shot him down , in Mort Sahls’ words, “like a dog in the street.”

Jim Keith: “The Kennedy assassination was a British Intelligence, i.e. Tavistock hit, and its purpose was to shock the American consciousness into a near-comatose state for reprogramming, the standard Tavistock modus operandi.” (143)


The same can be said for the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy.  It all climaxed with the beatings of demonstrators at the 1968 Chicago Democratic convention.  After that, my generation turned inward as we were programmed to do. “Turn on, Tune in, Drop Out” said CIA funded pied piper Timothy Leary.

Many young people became “dead heads” after Jerry Garcia’s “Grateful Dead.” Keith writes:

“An FBI internal memo from 1968 mentions the employment of the Grateful Dead as an avenue ‘to channel youth dissent and rebellion into more benign and non-threatening directions.’ [They] performed a vital service in distracting many young persons into drugs and mysticism, rather than politics.” (179)

Keith goes on to document CIA connections to the creation of mind control cults used to create “controlled chaos.”  These include the Symbionese Liberation Army, Jim Jones, Charles Manson, Scientology, the Unification Church, Son of Sam and Heaven’s Gate.  The John Lennon assassination also ties in. (183)

To bring the picture up to date, add the murder of Princess Diana, Columbine, the blowing of the levees in New Orleans, the burning of Black churches, and the bird flu scare. What we have is an ongoing secret war by the central bankers against society, a drumbeat of psychological torture designed to keep society off balance or zoned out.

The most significant thing about our life is that we are victims of elite mind control.  We have been trained to be apathetic, trivia-minded and self absorbed

In addition, my own research (, suggests that the man-caused global warming hoax is another Tavistock or Tavistock-related psychological operation.  Indeed, I conclude that the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) hoax is merely a cover story for two other projects that are also likely to have been conceived and implemented in Tavistock institutions.  These include the United Nations’/U.S. and Britain’s Plan A (implementation of global carbon taxes as per the United Nations Kyoto Protocol) and Plan B (global coordination of weather modification/geoengineering/solar radiation management programs).  Plan B technology is already quite advanced and is now being used as the basis of weather/environmental warfare. (

H.  Tavistock Techniques For Molding the Public Mind

What specific methods do Tavistock “behavioral scientists” use to control the American public mind?  Dr. Fred Emery, senior “behavioral scientist” at Tavistockdescribes the three phases of “social environmental turbulence” that are contrived and implemented by Tavistock’s social engineers (from Coleman, 2006b):

Large population groups manifest the following symptoms when subjected to conditions of violent social changes, stress, and turbulence which can be divided into well-defined categories.

The three phases of “maladaptive response” to the contrived chaotic situations imposed by the invisible (Tavistock) social engineers are:


1) superficiality, in which the threatened population adopts shallow sloganeering in place of ideals, 

2) fragmentation and panic, in which “social cohesion” falls apart, 

3) passive maladaption, in which victims take “fantasy trips of internal migration, introspection and obsession with self.”  This last phase is referred to asdisassociation and self-realization.  

(We will explore the importance of dissociation in the creation of Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), and in the creation of mind-controlled slaves in the next section of this paper.)

Tavistock also constantly monitors Americans’ responses to its constant manipulations.  From Coleman (2006b):

Emery states that over the past 50 years, experiments in applied social psychology and resultant “crisis management” have taken over all aspects of life in America and the results are stored in the computers of the major “think tanks” such as Stanford University.  The scenarios are taken out, used and revised from time to time, and according to Tavistock, “the scenarios are in operation at the present time.”  Translated, this means that Tavistock has the majority of the American people profiled and brainwashed today.

According to Coleman (2006b), it was Tavistock that developed the brain-washing techniques first used experimentally by Koreans on American prisoners of war in Korea.  Thus, the U.S. government’s claim that their mind control experiments were conducted to advance “national security” and to counter the superior brainwashing capabilities of “the communists” is shown to be yet another lie.

I.  Tavistock’s Use of Drugs

In “The Tavistock Institute: The Holographic Matrix by Merlintm (, the author states:

All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal—to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the New World Order.  Any technique which helps to break down the family unit and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism, and sexual behavior, is used by Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce *permanent mental illness* in those who undergo this treatment, by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to “establish new rituals of personal interaction”, which they define as indulging in brief sexual encounters, which set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family….

Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent.  R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post, August 20, 1984, cites the “squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS”, as resulting in “the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness” in this country and throughout the world.

Tavistock continues to destroy America by using essentially the same techniques that the British East India Company used to wrest economic control of China and impose a series of trade treaties that created a “century of humiliation” for China.  The technique, now as then, is to flood the target country with addictive drugs.  During British East India Company’s (BEIC) Opium Wars (1839 to 1842 and 1856-1860) against China, the BEIC simultaneously created conditions of social chaos in China and garnered enormous profits for the ruling families of England and the United States.  Tavistock and the CIA are using essentially the same strategy to systemically destroy the United States, beginning, of course, with the contrived “counter-culture revolution” of the 1960’s.

In “Tavistock: The Best Kept Secret in America” (2001), Weeks explains:

… A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy- the use of drugs…. The infamous MK ULTRA program of the CIA… originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm owned by S.G. Warburg Co. in London, developed Lysergic Acid (LSD).  Roosevelt’s advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug.  The result was the LSD “counter-culture of the 1960’s, the student revolution, which was financed by $25 million from the CIA. 

Summarizing the ongoing effects of this still unacknowledged part of American history, Coleman (2006b) states:

The effects of “long range penetration and inner directional conditioning” are everywhere to be observed.  The moral, spiritual, racial, economic, cultural and intellectual bankruptcy we are in the midst of today is not some social phenomena that just “happened.”  Rather, it was the outcome of the carefully planned Tavistock program. 

As noted above, other “contrived situations” that Tavistock and Tavistock-affiliated institutions helped implement include the Pearl Harbor attack, World War II, the Korean War, the JFK assassination, the Vietnam War, the two Gulf Wars, the 911 hoax, (probably) the global warming hoax, and currently, in all likelihood, the 2012/end-of-the-world hoax.

J.  From Tavistock to Lindesfarne to Crestone/Baca:  Gregory Bateson, the Double Bind, and the Cybernetics Group

In his treatise on the Tavistock Institute, Coleman (2006b) identifies The Aspen Institute of Colorado as “the American home of the Socialist One World Government Committee of 300.”  Coleman states:  “It was William Benton’s work (on the science of mass mind control through advertising) … that led to Tavistock’s burgeoning control over U.S. media through the Aspen Institute of Colorado, the American home of the Socialist One World Government Committee of 300.”  In Part I of this paper, it was shown that the Aspen Institute of Colorado had an early presence in Creatone/Baca.

Indeed, we can trace the intellectual and spiritual underpinnings of the Crestone/Baca to the Committee of 300 through the Aspen Institute of Colorado, Maurice Strong himself, and the Lindesfarne Association.  The Lindesfarne Association also had an early presence in Crestone/Baca.  Indeed, I have often brought friends to visit the impressive “Lindesfarne Dome” here which was built in the Baca using “sacred geometry” by Keith Critchlow, English professor of architecture, author, co-founder of the Temenos Academy, and founding member of the Research Into Lost Knowledge Organization (RILKO).   Wikipedia says this about Lindesfarne:

… is a group of intellectuals of diverse interests organized by cultural historianWilliam Irwin Thompson for the “study and realization of a new planetary culture”.  It is inspired by Jean Gebser‘s idea of the integral structure of consciousness, and by Teilhard de Chardin‘s idea of the “noosphere.”  In his bookReimagination of the World, Thompson described his reasons for naming his group after Lindisfarne, an island with a famous monastery (once inhabited by Saint Cuthbert) just off the coast of Northumberland in the North East of England:

“Although I used the word as a symbol of a small group of people effecting a transformation from one system to another, the word also brought with it the archetypical associations of a small group of monks holding onto ancient knowledge in a fallen world, a world that would soon overrun them during the Viking terror.”

In 1972, with funding from Sydney and Jean Lanier, and later from Laurance Rockefeller, Thompson founded the Lindisfarne Association, which functioned variously as a sponsor of new age events and lectures, and as a think tank and retreat, similar to the Esalen Institute in California.  Lindisfarne functioned through the Cathedral of Saint John the Divine in New York for a number of years.  Today Lindisfarne functions as a virtual association of the Fellows and meets once a year at varying locations.

According to the Lindisfarne Association website, Lindisfarne’s fourfold goals are:

  1. The Planetization of the Esoteric
  2. The realization of the inner harmony of all the great universal religions and the spiritual traditions of the tribal peoples of the world.
  3. The fostering of a new and healthier balance between nature and culture through the research and development of appropriate technologies, architectural settlements and compassionate economies for meta-industrial villages and convivial cities.
  4. The illumination of the spiritual foundations of political governance through scholarship and artistic communications that foster a global ecology of consciousness beyond the present ideological systems of warring industrial nation-states, outraged traditional societies, and ravaged lands and seas.

Members of Lindisfarne have included, among others:

The Lindisfarne Association disbanded as a not-for-profit institution in 2009.  The Lindisfarne Fellows continue to meet once a year at varying locations as an informal group interested in one another’s creative projects.

The four goals of Lindesfarne sound wonderful, right?  And the individuals listed above are amongst the wisest of today’s wise heroes and heroines, right?  Certainly, my library includes many books by the individuals listed above.  Certainly, I, like many others, was drawn to Crestone by the exuberant idealism that Lindesfarneepitomized.  But alas, things are not always what they seem.

In his retrospective essay: “Lindesfarne Café- Memoir: With Gregory Bateson’s Mind in Nature,” William Irwin Thompson (he goes by WIT) discusses the headyLindesfarne conferences between about 1974 and 1981 ( ).  Perhaps the headiest of the group of interdisciplinary visionaries, around whom the others constellated, was British anthropologist Gregory Bateson, author of Mind and Nature and former CIA operative.

how-they-control-us_clip_image002_0002 how-they-control-us_clip_image004_0002 how-they-control-us_clip_image006_0001how-they-control-us_clip_image008_0001

how-they-control-us_clip_image010_0001 how-they-control-us_clip_image012_0000how-they-control-us_clip_image014

Figure 4.  From upper left: William Irwin Thompson (WIT) lecturing in 1975; Gregory Bateson (center), English anthropologist, cyberneticist and author; discussion between Brother David Stendl-Rast, Saul Mendolwitz, and WIT in 1974.  Central large photo: Michael Katz, Brother David, Carl Sagan, Stewart Brand, Richard Baker-Roshi, Yvonne Rand, and David Spangler.  Bottom row: “new biologists” James Lovelock, author of the Gaia Hypothesis, Lynn Margulis, and on right: Mary Catherine Bateson and Francisco Varela at 1977 Mind-Life Conference. 

The Lindesfarne conferences in the 1970’s were intended to be extensions of the Macy conferences of the 40’s and 50’s and the Burg Wartenstein conferences of the 1960’s.

So let us first take a brief look at the importance of the Macy Conferences and it’s core group.  The series of 10 conferences sponsored by the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation (a Tavistock/CIA front and financing conduit) between 1946 and 1953 helped give birth to many modern ideas of mind control and cybernetics.  Gregory Bateson and his wife (at the time) anthropologist Margaret Mead, who were members of the small core group, stated that the Macy conferences grew out of a small March 1942 meeting set up by Frank Fremont-Smith on the topic of “Cerebral Inhibition.”

Wikepedia states:

…in the 1940s, (Frank Fremont-Smith organized) a meeting about “physiological mechanisms underlying the phenomena of conditioned reflexes and hypnosis as related to the problem of cerebral inhibition.”  This so-called “Cerebral Inhibition Meeting” was sponsored by the Josiah Macy Foundation and attended by scientists like Gregory Bateson, and Margaret Mead, and five others.  Together they would initiate the Cybernetics Group.  Among its members this group was called the “Man-Machine Project”.  Other participants were Warren McCullochArturo RosenbluethGregory BatesonMargaret Mead, and Lawrence K. Frank.   According to Steinberg (2000) “Rosenblueth, a protégé of Norbert Wiener, set out the broad parameters of the proposed effort.



Figure 5. From top left:  Frank Fremont Smith, American Executive Director of Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation and president of British General John Rawling Rees’ World Federation of Mental Health, anthropologists Margaret Meade and Gregory Bateson, Lawrence S. Kubie, Yale psychologist

Between 1946 and 1953, Fremont-Smith worked as Medical Director in the Macy Foundation, when ten Macy Conferences were a set of meetings of scholars from various disciplines held to discuss “Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems.”  It was one of the first organized studies of interdisciplinarity, spawning breakthroughs in systems theory and leading to the foundation of what later was to be known as cybernetics.  By the end of the 1950s, he was among the first members of the Society for General Systems Research.

In 1959. Frank Fremont-Smith, as head of the Macy foundation, was the organizer of the first ever held conferences on LSD.   When Fremont-Smith retired as the Foundation’s Medical Director, he was encouraged to apply the concept of Interdisciplinary Communications Program (ICP) to the field of the biological sciences in general.  He began the series Interdisciplinary Communications Program (1968-1976) at the Smithsonian Institution.[5]

Attendance at the Macy Foundation conferences was by invitation only and the only two topics on the agenda were hypnotism and conditioned reflex.   These six, who became part of the 20-member “core group,” included Lawrence Frank, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, psychiatrist Warren McCulloch, Mexican physiologist Arturo Rosenblueth, psychiatrist/hypnotist Lawrence Kubie.

K. Conclusions

In this section of the paper, we have made foray explorations into the identities of the groups and individuals that control world events and the perception of those events.   We have also begun to identify the means and mechanisms by which “the controllers” exercise and maintain control.  We have just scratched the surface of these topics and the topic of mind control itself.

The next section of this paper (Part VI) will focus on the history and technologies mind control.  Here we quickly ascertain that the Macy conferences described above actually followed, rather than anticipated, the secret experiments orchestrated by the CIA and other military and intelligence agencies and conducted by many prestigious psychiatrists at many top universities, prisons, and medical establishments in this country.  And we will begin to come to grips with the continuum of mind control techniques and technologies that have been developed in various countries over the past decades, centuries, and millennia.


Bateson, G., 2002, Mind And Nature: A Necessary Unity (Advances In Systems Theory, Complexity, And The Human Sciences), Hampton Press, 220 Pp.


Bernays, E., 1928, Propaganda, Ig Publishing (1935), 169 pp.

Bowart, W., 1978, Operation Mind Control: The CIA’s Plot Against America, Fontana/Collins, Glascow, 317 pp.

Chaitkin, A., 2002, British psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination, Executive Intelligence Review, V. 21, #40.

Cherep-Spiridovich, C., 1926, The Secret World Government or “The Hidden Hand,” 203 pp.

Coleman, J., 2006a, The Conspirators Hierarchy:  The Committee of 300, 4th Edition, Global Review Publications, Las Vegas, NV, 482 pp.

______, 2006b, The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political, and Economic Decline of the United States of America, World in Review, Las Vegas, NV, 242 pp.

Condon, J., 1959, The Manchurian Candidate, Thunders Mouth Press (2003), 320 pp.

Keith, J., 1999, Mass Control:  Engineering Human Consciousness, Adventures Unlimited Press, Kempton, IL, 253 pp.

Kimball, L., 2007, Cultural Marxism, American Thinker

Marx, K., and Engels, F., 1848 (1948), The Communist Manifesto, International Publishers, 48 pp.

Matthews, T., 2009, The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt,

Makow, H., PhD, 2006, War on Terror is Elite Mind Control,

Marsden, V.E., Translator, 1934 (2011), Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, RiverCrest Publishing, Austin, Texas, 301 pp.

Merlintm, The Tavistock Institute: The Holographic Matrix, ” (

Mullins, 1985, The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, Staunton, VA.

Ruiz, C., 2001, A Nation Betrayed: The Chilling Story of Secret Cold War Experiments on Our Children and Other Innocent Victims, Fidelity Publishing, Grass Lake, Michigan, 242 pp.

Russell, B., 1931, The Scientific Outlook, Allen and Unwin, London,

_____, 1953, The Impact of Science on Society, Routledge, 128 pp.

Sargent, W., 1957, Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brain-Washing, Major Books, 332 pp.

Spengler, O., 1937, The Decline of Western Civilization, Knopf, 480 pp.

Weeks, B.,T., 2001, Tavistock: The Best Kept Secret in America