JB Smith (Dec. 2, 2015) posted a comment response to Alex Constantine’s 2013 article: Electronic Torture and Mind Control: A Survival Guide For Targeted Individuals” which contains a number of interesting leads and sources.
(
Electronic Torture and Mind Control: A Survival Guide for Targeted Individuals
)
In the opinion of this webmaster, these leads are worth pursuing. The emboldened part of JB Smith’s comment (below) provides the basis of this post, as I here duplicate some of the references he cites, specifically:
I. Terrorism and Mental Health: The issue of psychological fragility by Amin A. Muhammad Gadit
II. A note on ‘Überveillance’ by M G. Michael and Katina Michael, University of Wollongong
III. Safeguards in a World of Ambient IntelligenceOutline of a Research Agenda on the European Level by
Michael Friedewald, Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Breslauer Straße 48,D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
IV. Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics by Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland December 6, 2000
Comment by JB Smith December 2, 2015
The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act and the brain initiative are the worst scams ever perpetrated on the American people. Former U. S. Surgeon General Regina Benjamin Warns: Biochips Hazardous to Your Health: Warning, biochips may cause behavioral changes and high suicide rates. State Attorney Generals are to revoke the licenses of doctors and dentists that implant chips in patients. Chip used illegally for GPS, tracking, organized crime, communication and torture. Virginia state police have been implanting citizens without their knowledge and consent for years and they are dying! Check out William and Mary’s site to see the torture enabled by the biochip and the Active Denial System. See Terrorism and Mental Health by Amin Gadit or A Note on Uberveillance by MG & Katina Michael or Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence by Springer or Mind Control, Microchip Implants and Cybernetics. Check out the audio spotlight by Holosonics. The truth is the biochip works like a sim card. It received pulsed modulated laser beams and millimeter wave which it converts into electromagnetic waves that your brain interprets into digital images and sound. It then takes what your brain sees and hears and converts electromagnetic waves into digital and acoustic waves that a computer translates into audio and video. In other words, it allows law enforcement to see what you see, hear what you hear and communicate directly with your brain.
“Former Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) director and now Google Executive, Regina E. Dugan, has unveiled a super small, ingestible microchip that we can all be expected to swallow by 2017. “A means of authentication,” she calls it, also called an electronic tattoo, which takes NSA spying to whole new levels. She talks of the ‘mechanical mismatch problem between machines and humans,’ and specifically targets 10 – 20 year olds in her rant about the wonderful qualities of this new technology that can stretch in the human body and still be functional. Hailed as a ‘critical shift for research and medicine,’ these biochips would not only allow full access to insurance companies and government agencies to our pharmaceutical med-taking compliancy (or lack thereof), but also a host of other aspects of our lives which are truly none of their business, and certainly an extension of the removal of our freedoms and rights.” Google News
The ARRA authorizes payments to the states in an effort to encourage Medicaid Providers to adopt and use “certified EHR technology” aka biochips. ARRA will match Medicaid $5 for every $1 a state provides. Hospitals are paid $2 million to create “crisis stabilization wards” (Gitmo’s) where state police torture people – even unto death. They stopped my heart 90 times in 6 hours. Virginia Beach EMT’s were called to the scene.
Mary E. Schloendorff, v. The Society of New York Hospital 105 N. E. 92, 93 (N. Y. 1914) Justice Cardozo states, “every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent, commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages. (Pratt v Davis, 224 Ill. 300; Mohr v Williams, 95 Minn. 261.)
This case precedent requires police to falsely arrest you or kidnap you and call you a mental health patient in order to force the implant on you. You can also be forced to have a biochip if you have an infectious disease – like Eboli or Aids. Coalition of Justice vs the City of Hampton, VA settled a case out of court for $500,000 and removal of the biochip. Torture is punishable by $1,000 per day up to $2 million; Medical battery is worth $2.05 million.
They told my family it was the brain initiative. I checked with the oversight board, and it is not! Mark Warner told me it was research with the Active Denial System by the College of William and Mary, the USAF, and state and local law enforcement. It is called IBEX and it is excruciating.
I. Terrorism and Mental Health: The issue of psychological fragility
October 2009, Volume 59, Issue 10
Opinion and Debate
Terrorism and Mental Health: The issue of psychological fragility
Amin A. Muhammad Gadit ( Discipline of Psychiatry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada. )
It is rightly said that the world is no longer a safe place to live due to the growing terrorism. According to the U.S. Department of State report, ‘Terrorism is premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.1 A universal medical and public health definition was proposed which is: “The intentional use of violence, real or threatened, against one or more non-combatants and/or those services essential for or protective of their health, resulting in adverse health effects in those immediately affected and their community, ranging from a loss of well-being or security to injury, illness or death.2
The terrorist incidents of Pan Am Flight 103, Oklahoma City bombing and attack on World Trade Centre has shaken the mental health of children and adults in United States. The incidence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been recorded to be quite high among adults while children exhibited depressive disorder, separation anxiety disorders, grief reactions as well as PTSD. A survey conducted on 512 participants out of whom 84 had been directly exposed to a terrorist attack and 191 had a family member or friend exposed to such an attack revealed PTSD among 48 participants, acute stress disorder by one participant and 299 reported depression.3
In a study among Vietnamese refugees, people who were exposed to more than three trauma events had heightened risk of mental illness after 10 years compared to people with no trauma exposure. Results from a meta-analysis indicates that in a year following terrorist incidents, the prevalence of PTSD in directly affected populations varies between 12% and 16%. A national household survey6 on 4,023 people revealed six-months PTSD prevalence to be 3.7% for boys and 6.3% for girls, Major Depressive Episode among boys was 7.4% and 13.9% in girls, Substance Abuse Disorder had a six-month prevalence of 8.2% among boys and 6.2% for girls. In a study by Wanda,7 children’s responses to terrorism include acute stress disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, regressive behaviours, separation problems and sleep difficulties. Adults, adolescents and children do get the effects from violence and terrorism depending upon the type of event and psychological endurance. However, it is important to note the fact that the experience of violence does not necessarily lead to psychiatric morbidity.8 W.H.O. estimated that, in the situation of armed conflicts throughout the world “10% of the people who experience traumatic events will have serious mental health problems and another 10% will develop behaviour that will hinder their ability to function effectively. The most common conditions are depression, anxiety and psychosomatic problems such as insomnia, or back and stomach aches.”9
The matters in terms of violence are advancing with the passage of time that may possibly bring in more serious issues related to both physical as well as mental health.
Of late, there are reports of a new and dreadful invention of weapons of violence that are called Bio-electromagnetic Weapons. According to the description by an Institute of Science in Society, these weapons operate at the speed of light, can kill, torture and enslave without making physical appearance. It further adds that voices and visions, daydreams and nightmares are the most astonishing manifestations of this weapon system, it is also capable of crippling the human subject by limiting his/her normal range of movement, causing acute pain the equivalent of major organ failure or even death and interferes with normal functions of human senses. It can cause difficulty with breathing and induce seizures besides damage to the tissues and organs.
Through this form of terrorism, it is possible to persuade subjects that their mind is being read; their intellectual property is being plundered and can even motivate suicide or murder. Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs) are another form of weaponry that is used to paralyze a victim with pain. According to Peter Philips, a scientist from USA, circumstances may soon arrive in which anti-war or human right protestors suddenly feel a burning sensation akin to touching a hot skillet over their entire body. Simultaneously they may hear terrifying nauseating screaming, which while not produced externally, fills their brains with overwhelming disruption. This new invention is dreadful addition to the armamentarium of weapons of abuse and torture. Manifestations of the effects of these occult weapons can mimic mental ill health and add further to the misery of the victims.
The potential threat from use of biological warfare agents is more devastating as they are not detectable before the attack and can lead the possible victims to a state of constant vigilance and anxiety.
Pakistan has witnessed numerous episodes of terrorism and the common people are unable to see light at the end of the tunnel in terms of a termination point. This includes suicide bombing, killings, threats and violent intimidations. Horrendous acts of terrorism were video recorded and released on internet sites.
We have yet to see the psychological morbidity among the surviving victims and witnesses of Islamabad Marriot Attack and similar multiple attacks in numerous cities of Pakistan.
There are a number of questions that would arise: Do we have national figures on mental health morbidity leaving aside few publications and recorded personal observations? Are there any national empirical studies being conducted on terror related mental health morbidity? Do we have enough capability to address the psychological disaster resulting from this state of affairs? Are the mental health professionals adequately trained in terms of ‘disaster Psychiatry’? What is the magnitude of the problem among those who do not report the mental ill-health symptoms? Is there a need to equip the health system with the means and strategies to help the sufferers of terrorism? What can be done at the Family Practice level to begin with? Living in the midst of violence, should we not find effective ways to address the mental health morbidity before it is too late?
References
1.Ruby CL. The Definition of Terrorism, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2002; p 9-14.
2.Arnold JL, Ortenwall P, Birnbaum ML, Sundnes KO, Aggrawal A, Anantharaman V, et al. A proposed universal medical and public health definition of terrorism. Prehosp Disaster Med 2003; 18: 47-52.
3.Bleich A, Gelkopf M, Solomon Z. Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms and coping behaviours among a nationally representative sample in Israel JAMA; 2003; 290. 612-20.
4.Steel Z, Silove D, Phan T, Bauman A. Long term effect of psychological trauma on the mental health of Vietnamese refugees resettled in Australia: a population-based study. Lancet 2009; 360: 1056-62.
5.DiMaggio C, Galea S. The behavioural consequences of terrorism: A meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 13: 559-66.
6.Kilpatrick DG, Ruggiero KJ, Acierno R, Saunders BE, Resnick HS, Best CL. Violence and risk of PTSD, Major Depression, Substance Abuse/Dependence, and Comorbidity: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. J Counsult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 692-700.
7.Wanda F. Childhood reactions to terrorism-induced trauma: A review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 43: 381-92.
8.Curran PS, Miller PW. Psychiatric implications of chronic civilian strife or war; Northern Ireland. Adv Psychiatr Treatment 2001; 7: 73-80.
9.World Health Organization. World health report 2001-Mental health: new understanding, new hope. Geneva: Switzerland 2001; p 1-16.
II. A note on ‘Überveillance’ by M G. Michael and Katina Michael, University of Wollongong
Michael, M. G. & Michael, K. (2007). A note on ‘Überveillance’. In K. Michael & M. G. Michael (Eds.), The Second Workshop on the Social Implications of National Security: From Dataveillance to Uberveillance and the Realpolitik of the Transparent Society (pp. 9-25). Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
Abstract
The following note from the editors presents a summary of the term überveillance, as it was originally presented by the primary author in May 2006. Überveillance is an above and beyond, an exaggerated, an almost omnipresent 24/7 electronic surveillance. It is a surveillance that is not only “always on” but “always with you” (it is ubiquitous) because the technology that facilitates it, in its ultimate implementation, is embedded within the human body. The problem with this kind of bodily invasive surveillance is that omnipresence in the ‘material’ world will not always equate with omniscience, hence the real concern for misinformation, misinterpretation, and information manipulation.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/adbd/07780609038cfd8d31c859161d5274a038db.pdf
III. Safeguards in a World of Ambient IntelligenceOutline of a Research Agenda on the European Level
Michael Friedewald, Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Breslauer Straße 48,D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany m.friedewald@isi.fraunhofer.
Abstract.
Ambient Intelligence is a vision of the future information society stem-ming from the convergence of ubiquitous computing, ubiquitous communication and intelligent user-friendly interfaces. Beyond the possible benefits that are associated with this vision, it also requires a proper balance of a complex diversity of interests and values. The paper gives an outline of the various risks and vulnerabilities associated with Ambient Intelligence and argues why the design of safeguards and privacy enhancing mechanisms is a central task of European policy.1
The Brave New World of Ambient Intelligence – Promises and Fears Ambient Intelligence (AmI) has been described and characterised in a variety of ways and using a variety of terminologies. Pervasive computing, ubiquitous computing, embedded intelligence, invisible computing, seamless intelligence are just a few of the terms that have been used synonymously with Ambient Intelligence. Some have described the capabilities of AmI by the construction of scenarios and created roadmaps to indicate how we can arrive at such scenarios and the multi-faceted benefits that are expected to arise from the deployment of Ambient Intelligence [1, 2].While the European Commission has supported and continues to support man projects that will help society reach this wondrous new world, in fact, the construction of the Ambient Intelligence environment has already begun. Sensors and actuators, key AmI technologies, have been in use for decades as a result of the exponential increase in electronic capabilities. However, the dramatic reduction in the cost of computing and communications and the rise of the Internet have facilitated the exchange of information among these early AmI devices and have contributed to laying the foundations for the scenarios envisaged for the future. Above all, the networking of the proliferating de-vices in recent years demonstrates that the future, despite the still remaining formidable technological challenges, is not so far off.
While the technologists have been at work concerns relating to privacy, security, identity, social inclusion and other issues are beginning to get more attention. The fears conjured up by the impact of an Orwellian Big Brother only complicate the apparent lack of trust, which hinders the full flowering of the Internet for e-commerce, e-government, e-health and much else. In November 2003, some 30 privacy advocacy groups joined together to produce a position paper calling for a halt to the deployment of radio frequency identification tags (RFIDs) until certain public policy issues are resolved [3]. After a fashion, their concerns reflect a few of the more numerous and even more complex issues raised by the IST Advisory Group (ISTAG) in their June 2002 paper entitled Trust, dependability, security and privacy for IST in FP6[4].2
Challenges for European PolicyAmI should be seen as a set of artifacts requiring a proper balance which takes into account a complex diversity of interests and values related to access to information, protection of the individual sphere, trust, security, protection against discrimination, protection of identity, free speech, protection against intrusions and so on. Such a balance demands an approach which is not only driven by one or two actual, emotional, economic or social signals or events, but which proceeds by a rational mobilisation of the many possible relevant perceptions and definitions of the issues at stake. Such a balancing exercise raises a number of issues that need to be taken into account, e. g.,
–the increasing concern for security after 11 September 2001;
–technological innovation, its dissemination and consequences, only some of which can be foreseen (the invisibility of networked “intelligent” devices, ubiquity of computer communications, anonymity and privacy impacts, user friendliness, price, accessibility, etc.);
–a tendency toward privatisation of governance (the weakening of public power to control and steer the evolutions as a result of the increasing power of private actors both at local and global level).
Every one of us goes through life playing many different roles, which in essence could be reduced to three main ones that of the private individual, the professional and the public participant.
Private individuals are mindful of their pursuits and/or responsibilities as parents or members of a family or on their own who from time to time have concerns about their health or modes of entertainment and leisure activity or shopping or whatever. Living ina world of Ambient Intelligence should reduce the time it takes to pursue these things and increase the richness of daily experience [5]. Similarly, the professionals ability to communicate with his/her peers, either in the same office or on the other side of the world, to have an infinite world of information and intelligence at a fingertip to facilitate decision-making, will expand with Ambient Intelligence. In their public role, citizens will participate in social and political activities, perhaps lobbying for or supporting this or that cause. In each of these roles, the citizens level of trust and confidence in supporting technology and in those with whom (s)he might be in contact will vary.Citizens demands for security, privacy, confidentiality, anonymity will also vary ac-cording to the situation, and the situations may be very fluid, changing many times in the course of a day. In some of their roles, they will place demands on others,
References
1.
IST Advisory Group, Ducatel, K., Bogdanovicz, M., Scapolo, F., Leijten, J., Burgelman, J.C.: Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville (2001)Google Scholar
2.
Friedewald, M., Da Costa, O. (eds.): Science and technology roadmapping: Ambient intelligence in everyday life (AmI@Life). Working paper, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville (2003)Google Scholar
3.
Consumers against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering (CASPIAN): Position Statement on the Use of RFID on Consumer Products (2003), http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/RFIDposition.htm
4.
IST Advisory Group: Trust, dependability, security and privacy for IST in FP6. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2002)Google Scholar
5.
Friedewald, M., Da Costa, O., Punie, Y., Alahuhta, P., Heinonen, S.: Perspectives of ambient intelligence in the home environment. Telematics and Informatics 22 (2005) (Forthcoming) Google Scholar
6.
European Commission: eEurope 2005: An information society for all. An Action Plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla European Council, June 21/22 2002. COM (2002), 263 final, Brussels (2002)Google Scholar
7.
European Commission: IST 2003 – The Opportunities Ahead. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2003)Google Scholar
8.
Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN: CERIAS Security Visionary Roundtable: Call to Action (2001)Google Scholar
9.
Schwarz, J.: Statement of John Schwarz, President, Symantec Corporation to the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Hearing on Worms, Viruses and Securing Our NationÕs ComputersÕ (2003), http://reform.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Schwarz-v5.pdf
10.
European Commission: Electronic Communications: The Road to the Knowledge Economy. COM (2003), 65 final, Brussels (2003)Google Scholar
11.
European Commission: Network and Information Security: Proposal for a European Policy Approach. COM (2001), 298 final, Brussels (2001)Google Scholar
12.
Beslay, L., Hakala, H.: Digital territory: Bubbles. In: Wejchert, J. (ed.) The Vision Book, Brussel (2005)
IV. Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics
– by Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland December 6, 2000
In 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book, Cybernetics, defined as a neurological communication and control theory already in use in small circles at that time. Yoneji Masuda, “Father of the Information Society,” stated his concern in 1980 that our liberty is threatened Orwellian-style by cybernetic technology totally unknown to most people. This technology links the brains of people via implanted microchips to satellites controlled by ground-based supercomputers.
The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the state of Ohio, USA and also in Stockholm, Sweden. Brain electrodes were inserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the knowledge of their parents. In the 1950s and 60s, electrical implants were inserted into the brains of animals and humans, especially in the U.S., during research into behavior modification, and brain and body functioning. Mind control (MC) methods were used in attempts to change human behavior and attitudes. Influencing brain functions became an important goal of military and intelligence services.
Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in X-rays the size of one centimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of rice. They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide. Today they are small enough to be inserted into the neck or back, and also intravenously in different parts of the body during surgical operations, with or without the consent of the subject. It is now almost impossible to detect or remove them.
It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. In Sweden, Prime Minister Olof Palme gave permission in 1973 to implant prisoners, and Data Inspection’s ex-Director General Jan Freese revealed that nursing-home patients were implanted in the mid-1980s. The technology is revealed in the 1972:47 Swedish state report, Statens Officiella Utradninger (SOU).
Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even altered through the changing of frequencies. Guinea pigs in secret experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people considered “marginal” by the elite experimenters. The published experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.
Today’s microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now “see and hear” what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).
When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target’s performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person’s brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.
The NSA’s electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints. With electromagnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.
The Washington Post reported in May 1995 that Prince William of Great Britain was implanted at the age of 12. Thus, if he were ever kidnapped, a radio wave with a specific frequency could be targeted to his microchip. The chip’s signal would be routed through a satellite to the computer screen of police headquarters, where the Prince’s movements could be followed. He could actually be located anywhere on the globe.
The mass media has not reported that an implanted person’s privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. She can be manipulated in many ways. Using different frequencies, the secret controller of this equipment can even change a person’s emotional life. She can be made aggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can be artificially influenced. Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.
A perfect cyber-soldier can thus be created. This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having heard anything about it. Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control systems is available in professional and academic journals.
The NSA’s Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50 HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Mind control techniques can be used for political purposes. The goal of mind controllers today is to induce the targeted persons or groups to act against his or her own convictions and best interests. Zombified individuals can even be programmed to murder and remember nothing of their crime afterward. Alarming examples of this phenomenon can be found in the U.S.
This “silent war” is being conducted against unknowing civilians and soldiers by military and intelligence agencies. Since 1980, electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) has been secretly used to control people targeted without their knowledge or consent. All international human rights agreements forbid non consensual manipulation of human beings — even in prisons, not to speak of civilian populations.
Under an initiative of U.S. Senator John Glenn, discussions commenced in January 1997 about the dangers of radiating civilian populations. Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields and beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem that should be addressed in democratically elected government bodies.
In addition to electronic MC, chemical methods have also been developed. Mind-altering drugs and different smelling gasses affecting brain function negatively can be injected into air ducts or water pipes. Bacteria and viruses have also been tested this way in several countries.
Today’s super technology, connecting our brain functions via microchips (or even without them, according to the latest technology) to computers via satellites in the U.S. or Israel, poses the gravest threat to humanity. The latest supercomputers are powerful enough to monitor the whole world’s population. What will happen when people are tempted by false premises to allow microchips into their bodies? One lure will be a microchip identity card. Compulsory legislation has even been secretly proposed in the U.S. to criminalize removal of an ID implant.
Are we ready for the robotization of mankind and the total elimination of privacy, including freedom of thought? How many of us would want to cede our entire life, including our most secret thoughts, to Big Brother? Yet the technology exists to create a totalitarian New World Order. Covert neurological communication systems are in place to counteract independent thinking and to control social and political activity on behalf of self-serving private and military interests.
When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by means of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest. This threat can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry and information exchanged at international congresses.
One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespread prestige of the psychiatric Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV produced by the U.S. American Psychiatric Association (APA) and printed in 18 languages. Psychiatrists working for U.S. intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising this manual. This psychiatric “bible” covers up the secret development of MC technologies by labeling some of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.
Victims of mind control experimentation are thus routinely diagnosed, knee-jerk fashion, as mentally ill by doctors who learned the DSM “symptom” list in medical school. Physicians have not been schooled that patients may be telling the truth when they report being targeted against their will or being used as guinea pigs for electronic, chemical and bacteriological forms of psychological warfare.
Time is running out for changing the direction of military medicine, and ensuring the future of human freedom.
This article was originally published in the 36th-year edition of the Finnish-language journal SPEKULA (3rd Quarter, 1999). SPEKULA (circulation 6500) is a publication of Northern Finland medical students and doctors of Oulu University OLK (Oulun Laaketieteellinen Kilta). It is mailed to all medical students of Finland and all Northern Finland medical doctors.