I greatly admire Whitney Webb’s work and am very grateful for it. However, how shes manage to steer clear of the subject of “gangstalking-electronic harassment,” as it is so intimately connected with this topics, is beyond me. Nonetheless, all this information is extremely germane to our principle topics of gangstalking, mind control, electronic no-touch torture, nonconsensual human experimentation, and cults.
Indeed, what Ms. Webb describes here is the radical expansion, through nationalization and globalization, of the previously top-secret gangstalking (Zersetzung-Phoenix-Condor) program.
Who Is a “Terrorist” in Biden’s America?
Posted on June 18, 2021 Author Whitney Webb
Who Is A “Terrorist” In Biden’s America? (Whitney Webb, June 18, 2021)
Far from being a war against “white supremacy,” the Biden administration’s new “domestic terror” strategy clearly targets primarily those who oppose US government overreach and those who oppose capitalism and/or globalization.
In the latest sign that the US government’s War on Domestic Terror is growing in scope and scale, the White House on Tuesday revealed the nation’s first ever government-wide strategy for confronting domestic terrorism. While cloaked in language about stemming racially motivated violence, the strategy places those deemed “anti-government” or “anti-authority” on a par with racist extremists and charts out policies that could easily be abused to silence or even criminalize online criticism of the government.
Even more disturbing is the call to essentially fuse intelligence agencies, law enforcement, Silicon Valley, and “community” and “faith-based” organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League, as well as unspecified foreign governments, as partners in this “war,” which the strategy makes clear will rely heavily on a pre-crime orientation focused largely on what is said on social media and encrypted platforms. Though the strategy claims that the government will “shield free speech and civil liberties” in implementing this policy, its contents reveal that it is poised to gut both.
Indeed, while framed publicly as chiefly targeting “right-wing white supremacists,” the strategy itself makes it clear that the government does not plan to focus on the Right but instead will pursue “domestic terrorists” in “an ideologically neutral, threat-driven manner,” as the law “makes no distinction based on political view—left, right or center.” It also states that a key goal of this strategic framework is to ensure “that there is simply no governmental tolerance . . . of violence as an acceptable mode of seeking political or social change,” regardless of a perpetrator’s political affiliation.
Considering that the main cheerleaders for the War on Domestic Terror exist mainly in establishment left circles, such individuals should rethink their support for this new policy given that the above statements could easily come to encompass Black Lives Matter–related protests, such as those that transpired last summer, depending on which political party is in power.
Once the new infrastructure is in place, it will remain there and will be open to the same abuses perpetrated by both political parties in the US during the lengthy War on Terror following September 11, 2001. The history of this new “domestic terror” policy, including its origins in the Trump administration, makes this clear.
It’s Never Been Easier to Be a “Terrorist”
In introducing the strategy, the Biden administration cites “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists” as a key reason for the new policy and a main justification for the War on Domestic Terror in general. This was most recently demonstrated Tuesday in Attorney General Merrick Garland’s statement announcing this new strategy. However, the document itself puts “anti-government” or “anti-authority” “extremists” in the same category as violent white supremacists in terms of being a threat to the homeland. The strategy’s characterization of such individuals is unsettling.
For instance, those who “violently oppose” “all forms of capitalism” or “corporate globalization” are listed under this less-discussed category of “domestic terrorist.” This highlights how people on the left, many of whom have called for capitalism to be dismantled or replaced in the US in recent years, could easily be targeted in this new “war” that many self-proclaimed leftists are currently supporting. Similarly, “environmentally-motivated extremists,” a category in which groups such as Extinction Rebellion could easily fall, are also included.
In addition, the phrasing indicates that it could easily include as “terrorists” those who oppose the World Economic Forum’s vision for global “stakeholder capitalism,” as that form of “capitalism” involves corporations and their main “stakeholders” creating a new global economic and governance system. The WEF’s stakeholder capitalism thus involves both “capitalism” and “corporate globalization.”
The strategy also includes those who “take steps to violently resist government authority . . . based on perceived overreach.” This, of course, creates a dangerous situation in which the government could, purposely or otherwise, implement a policy that is an obvious overreach and/or blatantly unconstitutional and then label those who resist it “domestic terrorists” and deal with them as such—well before the overreach can be challenged in court.
Another telling addition to this group of potential “terrorists” is “any other individual or group who engages in violence—or incites imminent violence—in opposition to legislative, regulatory or other actions taken by the government.” Thus, if the government implements a policy that a large swath of the population finds abhorrent, such as launching a new, unpopular war abroad, those deemed to be “inciting” resistance to the action online could be considered domestic terrorists.
Such scenarios are not unrealistic, given the loose way in which the government and the media have defined things like “incitement” and even “violence” (e. g., “hate speech” is a form of violence) in the recent past. The situation is ripe for manipulation and abuse. To think the federal government (including the Biden administration and subsequent administrations) would not abuse such power reflects an ignorance of US political history, particularly when the main forces behind most terrorist incidents in the nation are actually US government institutions like the FBI (more FBI examples here, here, here, and here).
Furthermore, the original plans for the detention of American dissidents in the event of a national emergency, drawn up during the Reagan era as part of its “continuity of government” contingency, cited popular nonviolent opposition to US intervention in Latin America as a potential “emergency” that could trigger the activation of those plans. Many of those “continuity of government” protocols remain on the books today and can be triggered, depending on the whims of those in power. It is unlikely that this new domestic terror framework will be any different regarding nonviolent protest and demonstrations.
Yet another passage in this section of the strategy states that “domestic terrorists” can, “in some instances, connect and intersect with conspiracy theories and other forms of disinformation and misinformation.” It adds that the proliferation of such “dangerous” information “on Internet-based communications platforms such as social media, file-upload sites and end-to-end encrypted platforms, all of these elements can combine and amplify threats to public safety.”
Thus, the presence of “conspiracy theories” and information deemed by the government to be “misinformation” online is itself framed as threatening public safety, a claim made more than once in this policy document. Given that a major “pillar” of the strategy involves eliminating online material that promotes “domestic terrorist” ideologies, it seems inevitable that such efforts will also “connect and intersect” with the censorship of “conspiracy theories” and narratives that the establishment finds inconvenient or threatening for any reason.
Pillars of Tyranny
The strategy notes in several places that this new domestic-terror policy will involve a variety of public-private partnerships in order to “build a community to address domestic terrorism that extends not only across the Federal Government but also to critical partners.” It adds, “That includes state, local, tribal and territorial governments, as well as foreign allies and partners, civil society, the technology sector, academic, and more.”
The mention of foreign allies and partners is important as it suggests a multinational approach to what is supposedly a US “domestic” issue and is yet another step toward a transnational security-state apparatus. A similar multinational approach was used to devastating effect during the CIA-developed Operation Condor, which was used to target and “disappear” domestic dissidents in South America in the 1970s and 1980s. The foreign allies mentioned in the Biden administration’s strategy are left unspecified, but it seems likely that such allies would include the rest of the Five Eyes alliance (the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand) and Israel, all of which already have well-established information-sharing agreements with the US for signals intelligence.
The new domestic-terror strategy has four main “pillars,” which can be summarized as (1) understanding and sharing domestic terrorism-related information, including with foreign governments and private tech companies; (2) preventing domestic terrorism recruitment and mobilization to violence; (3) disrupting and deterring domestic terrorism activity; and (4) confronting long-term contributors to domestic terrorism.
The first pillar involves the mass accumulation of data through new information-sharing partnerships and the deepening of existing ones. Much of this information sharing will involve increased data mining and analysis of statements made openly on the internet, particularly on social media, something already done by US intelligence contractors such as Palantir. While the gathering of such information has been ongoing for years, this policy allows even more to be shared and legally used to make cases against individuals deemed to have made threats or expressed “dangerous” opinions online.
Included in the first pillar is the need to increase engagement with financial institutions concerning the financing of “domestic terrorists.” US banks, such as Bank of America, have already gone quite far in this regard, leading to accusations that it has begun acting like an intelligence agency. Such claims were made after it was revealed that the BofA had passed to the government the private banking information of over two hundred people that the bank deemed as pointing to involvement in the events of January 6, 2021. It seems likely, given this passage in the strategy, that such behavior by banks will soon become the norm, rather than an outlier, in the United States.
The second pillar is ostensibly focused on preventing the online recruitment of domestic terrorists and online content that leads to the “mobilization of violence.” The strategy notes that this pillar “means reducing both supply and demand of recruitment materials by limiting widespread availability online and bolstering resilience to it by those who nonetheless encounter it.“ The strategy states that such government efforts in the past have a “mixed record,” but it goes on to claim that trampling on civil liberties will be avoided because the government is “consulting extensively” with unspecified “stakeholders” nationwide.
Regarding recruitment, the strategy states that “these activities are increasingly happening on Internet-based communications platforms, including social media, online gaming platforms, file-upload sites and end-to-end encrypted platforms, even as those products and services frequently offer other important benefits.” It adds that “the widespread availability of domestic terrorist recruitment material online is a national security threat whose front lines are overwhelmingly private-sector online platforms.”
The US government plans to provide “information to assist online platforms with their own initiatives to enforce their own terms of service that prohibits the use of their platforms for domestic terrorist activities” as well as to “facilitate more robust efforts outside the government to counter terrorists’ abuse of Internet-based communications platforms.”
Given the wider definition of “domestic terrorist” that now includes those who oppose capitalism and corporate globalization as well as those who resist government overreach, online content discussing these and other “anti-government” and “anti-authority” ideas could soon be treated in the same way as online Al Qaeda or ISIS propaganda. Efforts, however, are unlikely to remain focused on these topics. As Unlimited Hangout reported last November, both UK intelligence and the US national-security state were developing plans to treat critical reporting on the COVID-19 vaccines as “extremist” propaganda.
Another key part of this pillar is the need to “increase digital literacy” among the American public, while censoring “harmful content” disseminated by “terrorists” as well as by “hostile foreign powers seeking to undermine American democracy.” The latter is a clear reference to the claim that critical reporting of US government policy, particularly its military and intelligence activities abroad, was the product of “Russian disinformation,” a now discredited claim that was used to heavily censor independent media. This new government strategy appears to promise more of this sort of thing.
It also notes that “digital literacy” education for a domestic audience is being developed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Such a policy would have previously violated US law until the Obama administration worked with Congress to repeal the Smith-Mundt Act, thus lifting the ban on the government directing propaganda at domestic audiences.
The third pillar of the strategy seeks to increase the number of federal prosecutors investigating and trying domestic-terror cases. Their numbers are likely to jump as the definition of “domestic terrorist” is expanded. It also seeks to explore whether “legislative reforms could meaningfully and materially increase our ability to protect Americans from acts of domestic terrorism while simultaneously guarding against potential abuse of overreach.” In contrast to past public statements on police reform by those in the Biden administration, the strategy calls to “empower” state and local law enforcement to tackle domestic terrorism, including with increased access to “intelligence” on citizens deemed dangerous or subversive for any number of reasons.
To that effect, the strategy states the following (p. 24):
“The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Department of Homeland Security, with support from the National Counterterrorism Center [part of the intelligence community], are incorporating an increased focus on domestic terrorism into current intelligence products and leveraging current mechanisms of information and intelligence sharing to improve the sharing of domestic terrorism-related content and indicators with non-Federal partners. These agencies are also improving the usability of their existing information-sharing platforms, including through the development of mobile applications designed to provide a broader reach to non-Federal law enforcement partners, while simultaneously refining that support based on partner feedback.”
Such an intelligence tool could easily be, for example, Palantir, which is already used by the intelligence agencies, the DHS, and several US police departments for “predictive policing,” that is, pre-crime actions. Notably, Palantir has long included a “subversive” label for individuals included on government and law enforcement databases, a parallel with the controversial and highly secretive Main Core database of US dissidents.
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas made the “pre-crime” element of the new domestic terror strategy explicit on Tuesday when he said in a statement that DHS would continue “developing key partnerships with local stakeholders through the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships (CP3) to identify potential threats and prevent terrorism.” CP3, which replaced DHS’ Office for Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention this past May, officially “supports communities across the United States to prevent individuals from radicalizing to violence and intervene when individuals have already radicalized to violence.”
The fourth pillar of the strategy is by far the most opaque and cryptic, while also the most far-reaching. It aims to address the sources that cause “terrorists” to mobilize “towards violence.” This requires “tackling racism in America,” a lofty goal for an administration headed by the man who controversially eulogized Congress’ most ardent segregationist and who was a key architect of the 1994 crime bill. As well, it provides for “early intervention and appropriate care for those who pose a danger to themselves or others.”
In regard to the latter proposal, the Trump administration, in a bid to “stop mass shootings before they occur,” considered a proposal to create a “health DARPA” or “HARPA” that would monitor the online communications of everyday Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning signs that someone might be “mobilizing towards violence.” While the Trump administration did not create HARPA or adopt this policy, the Biden administration has recently announced plans to do so.
Finally, the strategy indicates that this fourth pillar is part of a “broader priority”: “enhancing faith in government and addressing the extreme polarization, fueled by a crisis of disinformation and misinformation often channeled through social media platforms, which can tear Americans apart and lead some to violence.” In other words, fostering trust in government while simultaneously censoring “polarizing” voices who distrust or criticize the government is a key policy goal behind the Biden administration’s new domestic-terror strategy.
Calling Their Shots?
While this is a new strategy, its origins lie in the Trump administration. In October 2019, Trump’s attorney general William Barr formally announced in a memorandum that a new “national disruption and early engagement program” aimed at detecting those “mobilizing towards violence” before they commit any crime would launch in the coming months. That program, known as DEEP (Disruption and Early Engagement Program), is now active and has involved the Department of Justice, the FBI, and “private sector partners” since its creation.
Barr’s announcement of DEEP followed his unsettling
“prediction” in July 2019 that “a major incident may occur at any time that will galvanize public opinion on these issues.” Not long after that speech, a spate of mass shootings occurred, including the El Paso Walmart shooting, which killed twenty-three and about which many questions remain unanswered regarding the FBI’s apparent foreknowledge of the event. After these events took place in 2019, Trump called for the creation of a government backdoor into encryption and the very pre-crime system that Barr announced shortly thereafter in October 2019. The Biden administration, in publishing this strategy, is merely finishing what Barr started.
Indeed, a “prediction” like Barr’s in 2019 was offered by the DHS’ Elizabeth Neumann during a Congressional hearing in late February 2020. That hearing was largely ignored by the media as it coincided with an international rise of concern regarding COVID-19. At the hearing, Neumann, who previously coordinated the development of the government’s post-9/11 terrorism information sharing strategies and policies and worked closely with the intelligence community, gave the following warning about an imminent “domestic terror” event in the United States:
“And every counterterrorism professional I speak to in the federal government and overseas feels like we are at the doorstep of another 9/11, maybe not something that catastrophic in terms of the visual or the numbers, but that we can see it building and we don’t quite know how to stop it.”
This “another 9/11” emerged on January 6, 2021, as the events of that day in the Capitol were quickly labeled as such by both the media and prominent politicians, while also inspiring calls from the White House and the Democrats for a “9/11-style commission” to investigate the incident. This event, of course, figures prominently in the justification for the new domestic-terror strategy, despite the considerable video and other evidence that shows that Capitol law enforcement, and potentially the FBI, were directly involved in facilitating the breach of the Capitol. In addition, when one considers that the QAnon movement, which had a clear role in the events of January 6, was itself likely a government-orchestrated psyop, the government hand in creating this situation seems clear.
It goes without saying that the official reasons offered for these militaristic “domestic terror” policies, which the US has already implemented abroad—causing much more terror than it has prevented—does not justify the creation of a massive new national-security infrastructure that aims to criminalize and censor online speech. Yet the admission that this new strategy, as part of a broader effort to “enhance faith in government,” combines domestic propaganda campaigns with the censorship and pursuit of those who distrust government heralds the end of even the illusion of democracy in the United States.
June 25, 2021 at 2:49 pm
I posted this on Whitney’s blog so someone reads it, but I am getting censored so no idea this is going through. Beware
I posted this on Tom Luongo’s blog. My comments don’t go through.
This is about 3 things:
1) Training their AIs on our brains.
2) Keeping their secrets.
3) Stealing our information and ideas, which they can use to huge profit on the financial markets and anywhere else.
Beware anyone who tries to gaslight you for an extended time!
Hey Tom, sorry this is off-topic, we don’t see eye to eye on everything but you were so right about the value of information.
That’s why they wanted me isolated. Someone was fucking with me.
They weren’t trying to silence me alone, they were stealing my ideas. They gave me some ideas in return, thinking I was the one benefiting. It was hidden under the guise of initiation that never ends. I’ve been censored on your blog somehow, I don’t think it was you. It could be a technical glitch though since wordpress sucks.
I said it from the start, our efforts need to be an open-source process, because otherwise the people with tech and bad intentions will literally violate your computer and your mind, and use it for themselves. The technology is here for them to do this, we’re the ones who don’t have it. Beware. Do things openly or only the bad guys will get the information. They’ll develop products and place bets on the market with it.
This about defending the private property which is your very mind, and them trying to keep secrets buried, both.
That’s why you make a thousand new age religion blogs where people submit to the idea of joining hivemind and “communitarian” empires. All your thoughts belong to society, really.
It’s extremely hard to stay down to earth when you go down this rabbit hole, but this is it, they want your brainpower and their secrets.
Basic natural law libertarian socialist ethics are the only thing I believe in anymore. I ditched even spirituality since it was a gateway drug to superstition.
It’s all about information.
June 25, 2021 at 8:23 pm
hearing all this …The only giant red flag booming statement Ms. Webb said IDF Terrorist acting as police, on US soil???? SO WE HAVE THE ULTRA HATE GROUP, the ADL who is fomenting the race war minute by minute and influencing US laws, now they are going to have IDF soldiers on US soil??? We just put an IDF trained cop in jail and major cities are still burning over the floyd murder by an IDF trained cop…. WHAT! WHAT! THAT IS THE MOST DANGEROUS THING I HAVE HEARD ,YET. We will be Palestinians on US SOIL. HELL NO. So these terrorists will be shooting US children, as they do in Palestine ??? this is worst than an invasion of the Chinese army. let me guess, they will help shoot are US kids too. RESOURCE TO FOLLOW UP ON THIS????
June 25, 2021 at 11:21 pm
Excerpt from (Surviving) The Great American Novelty by JSP
“The infection was everywhere, in plain sight of everyone. But, depending on how your mind
interpreted the “code”, that determined the message you received. The same words were
interpreted in a variety of ways. Layers of dis-info, camouflaging, and redirections were
broadcast, amplified and repeated in a 24 hour cycle. A few very talented “agitants” capitalized
on their “cult of personality”. It was an efficient way to (dis)organize the masses.
These “agitating agents” posed as “anti-establishment outsiders” singing songs of “ending
corruption” but in reality they helped to herd and ultimately clear the path of troublesome “truth
activists” who had been growing since 911. At the time, they were called “conspiracy theorists”
and then conflated with “domestic terrorists” after 2020, when framed by media architect
Everyone from “Neo-Nazis” to the “vaccine hesitant” to “911-Truthers” were all bundled into the
same “ dangerous basket of deplorables”. It was no coincidence that those who would push
back against totalitarian solutions were the targets of this gambit, although both sides were fed
false truths… The Left blamed Russian interference and radicals from the Right… and the Right
blamed Chinese plots and radicals from the Left.
…Both were manipulated by their prejudices, but the Right wing was armed and more likely to
resist.And, so, they became the target of Qanon. Along with Evangelicals.
Evangelicals were “naturally hesitant” to the solutions due to omens of Apocalypse.
Luciferase is a chemical that glows under UV light and was used in the first micro-dot tattoos,
contributing to “hesitancy”. The number 666 was found in the House Bill for Covid Relief. The
same number, 666, was found in the patent number for the “cryptocurrency” promoted by
Winthorp Fence. Buying and selling or travel could not be conducted without what many
considered “the mark of the Beast”. The evangelicals didn’t know it, but they had been primed
since Roman times to expect such signs… Your “resistance” was part of the show.
Neither side looked to our closest allies and history’s patterns for the answers. This “ruse” had
been used since 1947… effectively. The real enemy (the seed of Global Fascism, The Serpent’s
Egg) was invited to nest and fester in the form of US intelligence agencies long ago, and took
that initial step towards the “lockstep” with the 1947 NDA.
That was the silent coup. The Wall Street Lawyer whose brother had an airport named after him,
was the “Gatekeeper” who allowed the defeated Nazi intelligence agents to retrench after The
Battle of the Bulge and go underground and become the US Intelligence network… and NASA.
The Fascist-Technocratic parasite had been attached to our nation’s brain by lawyer and master
spy, Allan Dulles.
June 29, 2021 at 5:50 am
I saw this,….. “6uild 6ack 6etter”, from another blogger and it just seemed appropriate to pass it on.
July 7, 2021 at 6:42 pm
Where can one find this book??
June 26, 2021 at 11:57 am
The problem with government and the problem with corporations are one and the same: The rights of people are granted to entities as if an organisation without a physical body is as alive as real people. Then real people use the cover of governments or corporations to shield their actions and get away with things they could not as simple individuals. Body-politic metaphors have corrupted the minds of many and yet their popular use remains unmitigated (catch-22; Purging purge metaphors does not work). Real people are treated as if they are the disease which society needs curing from, and it’s real people who perpetuate such myths, cloaked in patriotism and jingoism.
June 26, 2021 at 4:11 pm
Medicare is going to become eugenics. I can so see this happening.
Paul S Martin
June 26, 2021 at 5:30 pm
Klaus Schwab of the Davros W.E.F. has warned us twice that there will be a Cyber attack. I think he is saying is that they will pull down the entire internet and only allow their approved/controlled web services.
June 26, 2021 at 8:28 pm
Re: factions/cooperation between the elite, I see this through the lens of historical patterns of imperialism; starting from the premise that this represents a new wave of imperialism, all elites agree on plundering the new “frontier” (imperialism always takes place along a frontier). The frontier in this case is biology itself merged with digital technology. However, competition and “factions” or even arms races emerge when individual elites or groups of elites compete for power within that colonized space. We can compare to the European colonization of the Global South starting in the 1400s. The Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, English and others all agreed that they were going to colonize and enslave the frontier and mine resources. The outcome was the same throughout the frontier. However, there were skirmishes and arms races between competing imperial powers over which one was going to occupy which space. That is what I believe is happening now. There are genuine conflicts among the elite but they are mostly just competing with each other over who gets which space to colonize and mine. Imperialism always goes after resources and this time, the resources are not crops, oil, spices or metals, but our very minds.
June 28, 2021 at 11:08 am
White supremacists, evangelicals chosen for rapture ,Jewish the chosen people ,chinese middle Kingdom, Japanese empire , English rulers of Brittania ,Black power, wealthy elitists ,ivy League alumni. Techno transhumanists .All with ideas of supremacy.
Where do I belong???
June 28, 2021 at 12:12 pm
Excellent discussion. On point. I will be sending several because from iphone.
David Icke has been demonized for decades, being influenced I only watched him beginning 2018. There is a recent one where he reviews a UK Military Futures document. It is about AI, transhumanism, genetic engineering. It is titled The Human Hive Mind and the End of Human Individuality. Since it is a document of the military it sets the plan snd Frames it as the future.
June 28, 2021 at 12:26 pm
DARPA and Regina. I donn’t know if you know this. Regina has at least one computer implant in her forearm. Excellent noting how DARPA directors (4 year stint) move to other places, like Google and FB and SRI. Always emphasize DARPA IS NATIONAL SECURITY and secrecy. That means wherever they move to, they are working National Security. You are documenting how big Tech is a tool.
The director after Regina, Indian name can’t remember, gave an interview in 2015 where she said there is nothing more important for Nat Sec than “collective identity”, how it is created and controlled. What are the collective identities today?
June 28, 2021 at 12:45 pm
One area I am studying is social engineering. I look for it to make it more visible. On Mindmatters on SOTT, they had a review of The Fourth Turning. The book presents the theory that society runs in generational cycles of 90 years. Because this cycle ends in 2030 and there is Agenda 2030 made me question.
The coauthor is Neil Howe. He was s member of the think tank Center for Strategic snd International Studies, CSIS, founde in 1962 at Georgetown U. Other members Kissinger and Brzezinski. Georgetown ended the relationship because CSIS was focussed on media, not scholarly research. Al Gore praised the book and his Inconvenient Truth is social engineering.
What does it show? A globalist think tank is authoring books to provide “scientific” foundation for the agenda. Of course, America is falling apart in 2030 because of this natural cycle.
June 28, 2021 at 1:04 pm
Regarding social engineering, Peter Foster wrote a review of Mark Carney’s book Values: BUILDing a BETTER World for All., on SOTT called “it won’t be pleasant” – Mark Carney unveils dystopian…
it sounds like Build Back Better to me.
Climate emergency will keep us locked up longer so WE CAN SAVE THE WORLD, uh, for the power brokers.
Whitney may have already run across Mark’s history.
June 28, 2021 at 1:11 pm
There is a site UKcolumn.org. One of their investigative reporters, Brian Gerrish, gave testimony to Reiner Fulimich in Germany regarding the “pandemic” and manipulation of the people. One of the methods is neuro linguistic programming.
June 28, 2021 at 1:25 pm
Whitney talked about AI and creating a singularity. The question is computing power. This is where quantum computing would be necessary. They are probably not there yet.
Dark winter. Though covid was either fake or lethality overrated, don’t lose sight of the jab and “antibody dependent enhancement”. The jan primes the person for cytokine storm response to flu.
Anadonia(?) sounded like pavlov’s dogs to me. Once they get you engineered, Schwaub will be right, “you will own nothing and you will be happy.”
June 28, 2021 at 1:43 pm
Basically the power brokers see man as a machine that needs to be upgraded to the improved, uniform and compliant model. Also older versions(the useless class) are obsolete and expendable. In this world, values and morality and the human soul, are delusions that must be expungef. Then we have the Power Broket Utopis. ( In the show, written by someone in the know, John Cusack on several occasions asks his daughter, What have you done “useful” today.
June 30, 2021 at 7:08 am
One last thought. We need to keep in mind child trafficking and pedophilia and Epstein. Epstein’s connections to power brokers at MIT, Harvard in education and science, all branches of government, MSM, and social media is the weak link in their power structure. Where was the money used?
I respect and applaud your seeking, finding and expressing truth. Truth brings light to the darkness.
July 1, 2021 at 1:35 am
Stumbled across Whitney”s Dark Winter series during lockdown as part of my own journey into the light. This new video offers brilliant context and draws back the curtain exposing the sinister agenda being obfuscated from a misinformed public. Fighting for my grandchildrens’ future. So many people walking around in a coma.