Epigraph Quote:
So in summary, Kathleen (Watterson) received a conditional restraining order for electromagnetic frequency harassment with penalties of up to 2 years in prison and up to $5000 in fines for violation of the court order. Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
Secretly Microwave-Assaulted Targeted Individuals Friday, August 1, 2014 7:14
UPDATE: Sun Aug. 31 6:00 a.m. EST
(The Targeted Individual “win” discussed in this article is actually only a win in terms of success in avoiding dismissal of the case.)
EMIGRATE WHILE YOU STILL CAN…
The author extends sincere apologies to all TIs if this article has been the source of fostering such false hope.
The court will hear defendant’s evidence on September 4 before deciding whether or not to grant a restraining order. No such decision has yet been made. A restraining order might be granted, but this will not benefit TI’s, according to legal expert “Bob S.”
“Winning a restraining order in court can’t be of any benefit in stopping electronic harassment produced by criminals in federal agencies,” Bob S. said in an email to Dupré Saturday. “If they put electronic transmitters in open sight and permit a TI to get a restraining order against a local perp, they can then remove the visible transmitters and continue the attacks from sources that can’t be located.”
Cointelpro tactics on steroids is what TIs are enduring.
“This and other cases like it, which may follow, will benefit the federal criminals by covering up their responsibility and making it appear that electronic attacks are a local problem created by local bad guys for which local solutions are available,” Bob S says.
NEW Breakthrough Product Helps You To Look and Feel Better GUARANTEED! Must-See Video
This is an ongoing story. Stay tuned.
After a landmark court case, a California Targeted Individual victim of a secret cell tower radio frequency directed energy weapon, claimed winning her case in court against her perpetrator and since then, she has been inundated with other targets pleading for help.
The “win” stirred strong emotions and hope of hundreds of innocent targeted individuals, all claiming they are being attacked by secret microwave weapons used for mind control and to torture them.
Kathleen Watterson, a Targeted Individual (TI) and Levi McCann, the expert witness in her case, both in California, are now conducting triage, as hundreds of desperate innocent victims contact Watterson for help.
“We have had over a thousand emails and are ferreting out the most WINNABLE cases. This is only the beginning,” Watterson wrote to Deborah Dupré in an email Thursday. “We’re going through all of them, working to see which ones have the best chance for winning in court.
Watterson and McCann “happened to meet at their nearby Walmart” in southern California. The rest became history. As it turned out, McCann is amazingly qualified with legal expertise and electronics. It was everything Watterson needed to win her case in court.
McCann demonstrated that standard satellite dishes within a 5-mile radius of Watterson’s home all pointed toward the equator where most satellites orbit the earth. That is, all but one, the defendant’s satellite dishes – that were pointed at Watterson’s house.
McCann revealed that other neighborhood satellite dishes were geared toward receiving signals for TV, the Internet, etc. – except for Watterson’s satellite dishes that, according to meter readings from an RF spectrum analyzer and a tri-field meter, were transmitting microwave signals at her house.
The evidence presented, plus expert knowledge and responses by McCann were overwhelmingly convincing. The judge believed his testimony. There remains one more court appearance in September.
Watterson received a conditional restraining order for electromagnetic frequency harassment with penalties of up to 2 years in prison and up to $5000 in fines for violation of the court order.
The U.S. government has never publicly acknowledged existence of this domestic offensive weapon grid, that “hides in plain sight” on cell towers in every neighborhood and along every highway in America, veteran journalist Vic Livingston has said.
“Not a single member of the Washington DC press corps has asked the White House about the nationwide system of extrajudicial punishment that ranges from community-based “gangstalking” to financial sabotage and covert electromagnetic weapon assault, impairment, torture and subjugation/”behavior (mind) control”.
Norah O’Donell was the last reporter to ask a high government official about electromagnetic weaponry, according to Livingston. She put the question to then-defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld at a Pentagon briefing.
“His answer appeared to confirm reports that such weaponry has been deployed and used in warfare (at that time, in Iraq). No reporter that I know of has followed up,” Livingston told Dupré. “I firmly believe that the White House cannot deny the existence of a nationwide program of extrajudicial punishment and electromagnetic weapon torture.”
Words by John Lennon, one of the most famous TIs, come to mind:
“Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it.”
II. Watterson v. Aro Court Ruling 9/04/15 Joshua Tree, CA
October 12, 2014 by stopogs
Watterson v. Aro Court Ruling 9/04/15 Joshua Tree, CA
Kathleen Watterson is a TI in Joshua Tree, CA who attempted to get a permanent restraining order against a former neighbor who still lives in her area and is assaulting her with microwave weapons. After many court dates Kathleen was able to get a temporary restraining order. On 9/04/14 the former neighbor petitioned against a permanent restraining order and won. In a previous court date the judge referred to a restraining order against microwave assault “like controlling fog”. But thanks to the judge’s advice, Kathleen is working on a bigger and better case against the defendant. Read the judge’s ruling below.
HONORABLE FRANK GAFKOWSKI, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING
Kathleen Watterson, plaintiff vs. Matti B. Aro, defendant (Mr. Ghan is the defendant’s attorney)
THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Ghan. Appreciate that. Okay. The issue before the Court, if we look at the definition of harassment, harassment in the sense in which it is to be dealt with under the Code of Civil Procedure, which is what this — Code of Civil Procedure is applicable. I think it is 527. There is several variations of it. But what I’m suggesting is this. Harassment is a knowing and willful statement or course of conduct that puts a person in fear for themselves and serves no legitimate purpose. It’s a course of conduct that annoys, harasses and so forth, causes a person to suffer perhaps emotional distress as well as physical harm. Now, I’m led to believe from Ms. Watterson that she has complained to Mr. Aro about this, and his expert did not see any evidence of the type of equipment that would intentionally allow microwaves to be addressed to her property some distance away. Her expert says it was possible and that, but we do not have evidence of the equipment itself. We’re thinking that it emanates from this one dish, and I’m speculating that it had to do with the microphone that was in the dish or the way the dish was apparently directed that could cause this interference with her lifestyle. I’m very satisfied that she has suffered physical ailment because of these microwaves. There’s no doubt in my mind. It is quite clear and convincing that she has suffered this harm. The question that I have is whether this was the result of negligence on the part of Mr. Aro. He claims to be a self-professed radio amateur buff — that is how I’m going to call him — that didn’t know any better that what he hooked up was causing this harm. Now, whether that transmutes or transfers or transmits into willful, intentional misconduct, clear and convincing, I cannot say
MS. WATTERSON: (Unintelligible.)
THE COURT: Ms. Watterson, I’m speaking. There is no doubt in my mind that he has caused this harm. But what causes me reflection is that we do not have evidence of the actual generator that apparently is necessary to operate this dish in such fashion. Maybe it exists. But I do not take it as an intentional invasion on his part. It was, in my opinion, the result. of his negligence, hooking things up that ultimately have caused harm to a neighbor. This is the subject of a negligence civil suit with substantial damages, but that is another forum. We’re dealing here with what would appear to be a criminal act. It’s atrocious that he doesn’t see his harm. His stubbornness is quite apparent. But his stubbornness and his attitude is such that I do not find it is equivalent of intentionally harassing, intentionally seeking to cause harm. I cannot call it a criminal act, which is the reason for the injunctive relief that Ms. Watterson sought. It is gross negligence on his part, very unwitting that he permitted himself to do that. I’m trusting that Mr. Aro will take it upon himself to change his equipment before Ms. Watterson files a civil suit and causes him real harm, because she has suffered terribly under this. And it is just because of the nature of the section that she chose to bring, trying to represent herself, that she didn’t seek the proper remedy, which is a negligence suit. Not intentionally inflicting harm, but a negligence suit, that his lack of care harmed you just as much as if he had hit you with his car. That’s what we have. But I cannot find clear and convincing that he did such with such a criminal intent, because that’s what we’re dealing with. I do appreciate your sincerity, Ms. Watterson. This is not over. This activity that you are involved in and your pursuit is not over. I suggest you seek proper legal advice, but I —
Advertisements
Report this ad
MS.WATTERSON: I might have a picture of the generator.
MR. GHAN: You’re ruling, your Honor.
THE COURT: I’m ruling. I’m already ruling.
MS. WATTERSON: Okay.
THE COURT: And that may be the generator, but we do not have actual proof of that. Under the circumstances, the Court does not sustain the petition.
MR.GHAN: Thepetitionisdenied;correct?
THE COURT: Petition is denied.
MR. GHAN: Thank you, your Honor.
THE COURT: That will be the order. Return exhibits to the parties. Ms. Watterson, you want your exhibits back?
MS. WATTERSON: Yeah, but I’d love to have them back. I’d rather you look at them, though.
THE COURT: You may have them back. (No further proceedings on this date.)
**Whole 9/04/14 transcript: http://www.knowing-is-half-the battle.com/TranscriptsKvAroNeg1.pdf
**Kathleen and Levi McCann’s website: http://www.knowing-is-half-the-battle.com/
Related
Organized Gang Stalking/ Electronic Harassment is…
June 16, 2013
In “Brain Mapping”
Please sign Letter to POTUS: Memorandum on Domestic US Torture Programs Running Under Cover of Surveillance
January 28, 2017
With 17 comments
What can be done about electronic harassment and organized group/community stalking?
January 2, 2013
In “http://mentalhealthrecoveryadvice.com/what-can-be-done-about-electronic-harassment-and-organized-groupcommunity-stalking/”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged Directed Energy weapons, Electronic Harassment, Joshua Tree, microwave weapons, Non- consensual Human Experimentation, Organized Stalking, Watterson vs. Aro. Bookmark the permalink.
Post navigation
← First Responder Harassment Log September 2014
Electronic torture, Electromagnetic torture, Microwave torture, Electronic murder, Electromagnetic murder, Microwave murder, Organized murder, Cooked alive, Electronic mind control, Electronic mind reading, Brain zapping, People zapper →
5 thoughts on “Watterson v. Aro Court Ruling 9/04/15 Joshua Tree, CA”
neverending1 October 13, 2014 at 5:56 pm
It doesn’t sound to me as if she won anything. Where does it say that?
Reply
stopogs October 14, 2014 at 4:37 am
She lost. But the judge just gave her guidelines on how to build a better case against him, which she is now doing. He told her to file a civil suit against him for negligence. It’s just going to be trial and error with our legal progress.
“It is gross negligence on his part, very unwitting that he permitted himself to do that. I’m trusting that Mr. Aro will take it upon himself to change his equipment before Ms. Watterson files a civil suit and causes him real harm, because she has suffered terribly under this. And it is just because of the nature of the section that she chose to bring, trying to represent herself, that she didn’t seek the proper remedy, which is a negligence suit. Not intentionally inflicting harm, but a negligence suit, that his lack of care harmed you just as much as if he had hit you with his car.”
Reply
Marquis Dunn February 20, 2017 at 3:38 pm
Hi u doing I’m marquis Dunn in Compton I’m being Electronic harass 24 hour everyday 747 plans over me every day United plans FedEx plans over me in Compton first time in my life seen big plains flying over Compton they planted voices all around me police officers in hellacopters
Reply
RICK October 20, 2017 at 9:18 pm
THAT IS TOTALLY WRONG FOR THE JUDGE TO OVER LOOK THIS CRUELTY BEHAVIOR AN NOT INVESTIGATE FURTHER INTO IT..IM GOING THRU THE SAME PUNISHMENT HERE IN YUMA ARIZONA..I HERE THE PEOPLE DISCUSSING. EVERYTHING. ME AN MY GIRLFRIEND ARE DOING TO THE POINT WHERE THE ARE SERIOUSLY. WATCHING US..I WE TRAVEL. OUT OF TOWN AN I STILL HERE THEM AS IF I HAVE A HUMAN COMPUTERCHIP..THIS TECHNOLOGY AN GOD HATEFUL GROUP OF PEOPLE NEED TO BE INCACERATED FOR DAMAGING OUR CAREERS AN LIFE..ESPECIALLY SEPARATING US FROM OUR FAMILY AS IF IT WAS THEM DOING IT..I HOPE YOUR CASE GETS TURN OVER AN YOU GET THE CHANCE TO IMPRISON THEM AN GO AFTER HIS CONNECTIONS INVOLVED..
Reply
Sonya………… August 2, 2018 at 6:57 am
I am presently experiencing electronic harassment from the AFP Australian Federal Police and the VICPOLL Victoria Police. I am requesting an end to this behaviour..and would like to know does ASIO approve of this technology being used to target people in Australia….is it OK by them…..please reply ASIO….why do they allow Victoria Police to do this…….please explain
Reply
Categories
Abuse of Power first responders
Covert Harassment
Drone surveillance
Fusion centers
Gang Stalking
Harassment of single women first responders
Illegal Surveillance
Joint Targeting
Joint Targeting by First Responders
Menticide
Nefarious Jobs
Organized stalking
suicided
Suiciding
Uncategorized
III. Prevention And Detection of Electronic Harassment And Surveillance (PDEHS)
Targeted Individual Kathleen Watterson Wins Electronic Harassment Court Case. Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
Prevention And Detection of Electronic Harassment And Surveillance (PDEHS)
Related:
Remote Neural Monitoring: How They Spy on Your Thoughts
EMF Quiet Zones: Free From Electronic Harassment In USA & Worldwide
Petition: Federal Law For The Prevention of Electronic Harassment
States That Have Electronic Harassment Penal Codes
Products For Targeted Individuals And Victims Suffering From Electronic Harassment
Targeted Individuals
Canada Reports New Case of Mysterious Illness In Cuba (#GotBitcoin?)
After a landmark court case, when a California Targeted Individual victim of a secret cell tower RF (radio frequency) based directed energy weapon, won her case in Joshua Tree Superior Court against her perpetrator (Watterson vs Aro), we have been inundated with other targets pleading for help. The win has stirred the strong emotions and hope of hundreds of innocent targeted individuals, all claiming they are being attacked by secret microwave weapons used for mind control and to torture them.
July 9, 2014 was the first time (that we know of) that electronic harassment was successfully argued and proven in a court of law.
Targeted Individual Kathleen Watterson Discusses Her Electronic Harassment Court Case Win
Levi McCann, the expert witness, and Kathleen Watterson just “happened” to meet recently at their nearby Walmart in southern California, the rest is history. As Levi turned out to be amazingly-qualified with legal expertise and electronics; everything needed to win a case like Kathleen’s in court.
Levi was able to show that standard satellite dishes within a 5-mile radius of Kathleen’s home were all pointed toward the equator where most satellites orbit the earth – except the defendant’s satellite dishes which were pointed at Kathleen’s house! He also revealed that the other neighborhood satellite dishes were geared toward receiving signals for TV, the Internet, etc. – except the defendant’s satellite dishes which, according to meter readings from an SPREAD SPECTRUM ANALYZER W/PRINT/RECORD/SAVE FEATURE and a MAGNETIC, ELECTRIC, RADIO AND MICROWAVE DETECTOR, were shown to be transmitting microwave signals at her house.
All the evidence presented, plus expert knowledge and responses from Levi blew away all meager protestations from the defense, so the judge believed his testimony. Folks, this case was expertly crafted and victory was assured and won! There remains one more court appearance in September.
So in summary, Kathleen received a conditional restraining order for electromagnetic frequency harassment with penalties of up to 2 years in prison and up to $5000 in fines for violation of the court order.
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought “to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations.” It is for this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as “the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
Millions of people across this country and the globe are being targeted in various ways by a growing number of covert harassment groups. Citizens are being watched, tracked, monitored and tortured; their private lives invaded, ruined, and many kept in virtual isolation from friends and family.
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS) was formed to address these atrocities and seek justice for those who are victims of harassment group activities which stem from corrupt elements of the US military intelligence and the US investigative agencies, certain defense contractors, corporations, as well as individuals and teams of private citizens.
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
The CIA MKULTRA hearings which were held in the 70’s revealed the existence of secret mind control experimentation programs being conducted by the government. After the hearings, the CIA officially abandoned these programs. However, many are reporting a variety of effects and abuses consistent with the findings of the Church Committee investigation regarding the privacy abuses conducted by the CIA, FBI, and NSA at that time. And nowadays, because of the secrecy and lack of congressional oversight during the intervening decades, the research and development of mind control and surveillance technology have advanced far beyond what most Americans would imagine.
List of Associated Harassment Activities:
You may be a victim of Organized Stalking if:
* You sense you are being watched and followed everywhere you go.
* You notice consistently rude behavior from people you don’t know for no apparent reason.
* You hear excerpts from conversations you had in the privacy of your home coming from people around you.
* You feel that those around you have access to your thoughts. ( see *1, *2, below for documentation of this )
* Your relationships and friendships all become distant or strained for no apparent reason.
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
* You have problems on the job where groups of people are plotting to have you terminated.
* Your business deals consistently fall through for no apparent reason.
* You experience vandalism on a regular basis.
* You notice that your things are not in the same place you left them when you left home or some small items may be missing.
* You experience frequent car repairs.
* You experience frequent appliance or electronic malfunctions.
You may be a victim of electronic harassment if:
* (see *3 below for most items in this section)
* You experience burning sensations on your skin or internal organs.
* You feel pin pricks on various parts of your body.
* You feel some type of energy moving inside your body.
* You experience extreme head pains.
* You feel drop-in-your-tracks fatigue on a regular basis.
* You continually have difficulty sleeping.
* You experience forced speech. (see *1 below)
* You experience uncontrolled-by-you movements of limbs or other body parts.
* You hear the voices of other people inside your mind with no other signs of mental illness
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
(see *1,*2 below for documentation of this)
If a significant number of items on these lists are happening to you, then you may be a victim of organized stalking or electronic harassment. Please visit the ‘What to Do’ page of this website for more information.
*1) Remote Neural Monitoring: Civil Action by John St. Clair Akwei
*2) Remote Behavioral Influencing Technology by John McMurtrey, M.A.
*3) Bio-electromagnetic Weapons by Harlan Girard, Managing Director, International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons (ICOMW)
About Us
PDEHS is a conference call group that began February 26, 2005. We presently have members in the United States, Canada, Western Europe, South America, India, China, and Australia.
We are advocates of social change through peaceful means only. We do not now nor will we ever condone any type of violence in our struggle for freedom.
We meet at conference calls throughout the week for purposes of support, networking, and advocacy. Times and call-in information are listed on the “Conference Calls and Contacts” page at this site. It is our goal to bring awareness to local and state officials, Congress, the media, and the general public of harassment group activities, mostly consisting of organized stalking and electromagnetic torture, so that laws will be passed and other measures taken to free those entrapped in what is known to us as “the secret holocaust.”
Block Cell Phone, RFID And GPS Tracker Signals
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS)
Mission Statement
Prevention and Detection of Electronic Harassment and Surveillance (PDEHS) is a human rights organization that is established to identify and network with victims of crime; to educate society about public safety issues; to advocate for the protection of American citizens from criminal elements. We endeavor to provide supportive services and promote self-help avenues to American citizens who are victims of poverty, unemployment, homelessness and various crimes, including domestic violence, vandalism, and organized stalking. We will also be networking nationwide with other public benefit and charitable organizations, as well as health and community development agencies at city, state and federal levels. The ultimate goal is to diligently promote the care and well-being for victims of stalking crimes who have few resources or avenues for a safe environment.