This post on the topic of Jewish psychopaths includes three articles:
1) “The real Norway story–A secret army of Jewish-trained psychopaths prepared to strike anywhere in the world and then blame it on somebody else” by John Kaminski
2) “The Psychopathology Of Being Jewish And Getting Away With It”
3) “Philip Green, Jewish Criminality, and the Cost of Economic Parasitism, Part 1: The Wider Context of Jewish White Collar Crime,” by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.
1) The real Norway story–A secret army of Jewish-trained psychopaths prepared to strike anywhere in the world and then blame it on somebody else
By John Kaminski
We have all witnessed a media syllabus unfold before our eyes these past few days, a demonstration of the paradigm that keeps the world locked into this false anti-terror paradigm, in which the terror is always manufactured by the people who claim to be fighting the terror. Do you get it yet? The only Muslim terrorists you ever hear about all work for the Mossad and the CIA.
You watched it. First Wolf Blitzer, the notorious Israeli agent anchorman, comes on CNN and announces that the Norway mass murders were done by Al-Qaeda, providing yet another reason, he says, why we should ramp up the War on Terror.
Shortly thereafter, when the mythmakers realize that story won’t fly, it is announced that the Norway massacre was carried out by some unknown party. Never, in any newspaper in the United States, is there a mention that the Norway atrocities were carried out by Israel, by Jews, by “friends” of Israel and Jews.
This is the implementation of cognitive dissonance at its finest, as the blurring of political categories keeps everyone confused. Jewish diversity at its best. CNN’s story about al-Qaeda doing the Norway murders is about as credible as Saddam having weapons of mass destruction, or Germans gassing 6 million Jews during a period of time, demographics has shown, when the Jewish population of Europe increased.
Uncountable TRILLIONS of dollars have been stolen by Israel, by Jews, by “friends” of Israel and the Jews, and continue to be stolen as we speak, in a million different ways, while anesthetized Americans find any excuse to look the other way, fearful of forfeiting their paychecks from whatever employer is facing the inevitable question: If I offend the Jews, will they put me out of business? Answer is: they will. And that’s why the United States is essentially out of business today: a hundred years of intense Jewish parasitism have totally erased any claim to morality Americans ever pretended to have.
Now, the host, our country, is about to expire, bled to death by those who worship the bottom line and don’t care about anything else. Congratulate yourself for the role you have played in all this, and the silence you have displayed while participating.
The young people killed in Norway were the finest, most caring and most intelligent, that Norway had to offer. Norway had recently gone on record as nourishing the Palestinians by recognizing their ambassador and criticizing Israel’s treatment of them publicly. Judging by the response in Israeli newspapers, Jews generally believe that Norway got what it deserved.
What does that mean?
Compare what happened right after 9/11 to the past week.
Remember the kneejerk reactions of the planted TV interviewees while 9/11 was happening? “Oh, it must have been Al-Qaida.” Worldwide Jewish media is still singing the same tune.
The murderous Norway caper pretty much blows away the remaining fragments over the long-discredited story that the 9/11 attacks were done by Muslims to provide the lame excuse for the War on Terror against the entire Islamic world. Can’t you get it through your heads? All the terror attacks — 9/11, Madrid, London, Bali, Mombasa, Yemen and now Norway, all of them false flag operations coordinated by the real axis of evil in the world: the Mossad, the CIA and MI-6, to convince the world that it is threatened by terror.
True, the world is threatened by terror. Only the people fighting terror are the ones manufacturing terror so they can fight it. This is a very Jewish philosophy, it’s what they do, it’s what they have always done and will continue to do.
But because the Jews own ALL the media in the world — ALL the media in the world, you heard it right; consider the distribution networks — you don’t hear that. You hear blind allegiance to the official version of events, or you will be ruined, if not killed.
The Norway psyop mass murders, in an epidemiological way, also resemble the recent public floggings of journalists Helen Thomas and Rick Sanchez, whose ordinary remarks about Jews earned them heaps of Jewish media scorn and more importantly, conveyed to the public that it would never be profitable to say anything about Jews. The Roman orator Cicero said almost the same thing almost two thousand years ago.
The underlying psyop message to the world from the Norway abomination is that if you actively work to oppose the Jews, you could be gunned down at any time by Jewish sayanim or mind-controlled Gentile slaves who are programmed or drugged to repress their human instincts and become solely an instrument of Jewish policy — which, in case you haven’t yet learned, Jewish policy is to kill or enslave every non Jew in the world. You can look it up. It’s in the Soncino Talmud (1929).
But then, that’s not such a change in the facts on the ground. People have always been getting killed for their political beliefs. Many writers have commented that assassination has been the one political tool that has governed American history more than anything else.
From Jack Ruby to Dylan Klebold. When you dig deeply, it seems like all the assassinations that ever happened were carried out by Jews, or by people operated by Jews. Consider that when you consider the Norway assassinations, 68 of them.
The policy of keeping silent, most Americans are afraid to contemplate, always eventually results in your own murder. It’s up to you to determine if you want to defend yourself and admit what’s really going on.
It’s checkout time for the Jews. Or, you can continue to take your cue from all those astute Jewish commentators who still insist the system can be fixed if you just accept their well-considered suggestions.
And for the non Jews, it’s seriously past time to ask an even more serious question. Now that we know this rancid system can’t be fixed, look yourself in the eye and ask yourself if this hollow, ravaged, insincere, oblivious, poisoned, and looted vestige of what America used to be is, and I mean this sincerely, even worth saving?
All America has become today in the world is a giant robotized Jewish war machine that kills people unjustly while its drugged and deluded populace looks the other way, refusing to admit they have become mindless puppets in a giant game show in which the host, picked at random from a giant pool of Jewish sayanim (many of whom are now federal judges), gets to say who lives or dies.
As Walter Cronkite used to say: “You Are There!”
By John Kaminski
2) The Psychopathology Of Being Jewish And Getting Away With It
Posted on November 13, 2012by horse237
Psychopaths do not reveal themselves until they do something which requires a conscience. They can imitate the behavior of others and for example to pretend grief at a funeral. But they reveal themselves to a camera as when President Clinton exited a funeral laughing and joking but instantaneously switched to grief mode when he saw TV cameras. Today I want to warn you about the strong strain of psychopathology in the Jewish leadership.
Psychopaths are attracted to positions of power and have a competitive advantage because they have no conscience. I will be commenting on the video below. Psychopaths reap a lot of social damage so we need to be aware of what they can do. An example of a corporation without a conscience would be Monsanto. An example of a group of people with leaders who border on psychopathology would be the Jews. The Rothschild owned Bank of England did loan the German government 350 million pounds in 1935 to buy guns and to rebuild (I.G.) Farben. And it was Israel that took down World Trade Center Towers 1, 2 and 7 on 9-11-2001 in order to plunge the Gentile world into war for the Jewish oligarchy. The video maker lists the key characteristics of psychopaths so we can spot them and hopefully protect ourselves.
Psychopaths do not have empathy. That is what defines them. Empathy is the ability to feel within one’s self the emotions and feelings of others. Empathy makes us human. Psychopaths have no empathy and are therefore not fully human. Psychopaths realize at an early age they are not fully human and learn to imitate others so they can be more socially acceptable.
Being Jewish is killing 60 million Gentiles in the Soviet Union, never saying you are sorry and Getting Away With It.
Psychopaths can have no genuine remorse. Remorse is a feeling of shame for an act the person has committed they deem to be hurtful to others. Psychopaths can pretend to be sorry when they see others are angry with them over their behavior. Jewish settlers and the Israeli Defense Force have combined forces to systematically commit atrocities on the Palestinians of Gaza and the West Bank. The Jews refuse to allow people overseas to send crayons, coloring books and musical instruments to the children of Gaza. Jewish adults armed with automatic weapons to routinely beat 5 and 6 year-old children walking to school. Some Jews object but most do not. The Jews were taught by the Talmud that it is permissible to rape a Gentile three year-old girl. It is perfectly lawful for a Jew to kill or to rob the Gentiles. That is why most Jews show no Empathy and Remorse for their egregiously bad behavior in the modern world.
Passion drives those of us who are normal. Psychopaths lack normal human passions and therefore tend to be superficial. Psychopaths only have passions for themselves. I believe this superficiality is evident in America’s Jewish controlled media and entertainment industries.
Psychopaths are grandiose. They live in a falsely constructed world in which they are both literally and figuratively gods. They have an overblown sense of entitlement. Have you noticed how many Bailouts are going to the Jewish bankers and a few Gentile traitors in Europe and America? The only reason for this nonsense is that the Jews insist we have a banking system that requires us to pay them interest on money they created out of nothing. It is as if they were gods and we were born to be sacrifice the whole of our lives to them as Debt Slaves always in bondage to them. They show no Empathy for the 3 million Americans who died from starvation in the Great Depression. And of course they show no Remorse because they are not fully human.
Psychopaths are irresponsible because nothing is ever their fault. They are never at fault because they think they are perfect. In the Talmud if a Jew rapes a Gentile woman she is to be put to death as an adulteress. But the Jewish rapist is blameless under Jewish law.
In the psychopath’s world whatever they want now is good and whatever they do not like is bad. This leads to impulsive behavior. If someone has money and the psychopath wants it, then robbery is good and the victim is bad. This explains why Goldman Sachs behaves the way they do with no regard for either Gentiles nor long term consequences.. This makes us understand the corporations and the government releasing genetic experiments into the wild with no sound thinking. An example would be the men who crossed the genes of s spider with those of the salmon and released it into the wild knowing the native and normal salmon will be extinct within 40 years. Psychopathology in the early 19th century was called Moral Insanity.
In a rational society psychopaths would not be allowed to live at the expense of others. They solve this problem by lying. Psychopaths hold their world together with lies. They lie compulsively. This is where the Jews excel. The Holohoax was a lie. 911 was a lie. Look at the Jew Arlen Specter who invented the Magic Bullet Theory of the Kennedy assassination to cover up Israel’s role in the murder of yet another American President.
Psychopaths are masters at manipulating others. They use our emotions against us. Jews do not feel guilt for the tens of millions they did kill in the Soviet Union. Nor do they feel guilty about killing 58 million people after the German Army and Navy attempted to surrender to His Majesty’s Jewish Government in March of 1939. They do not experience Empathy and Remorse because they are not fully human. Yet they can manipulate us into feeling guilty about a Holohoax that never happened even extorting taxpayer dollars from people who had nothing remotely to do with those imaginary events.
Psychopaths are anti-social. They do not care that Genetically Modified Organisms are destroying the health of tens of millions of people. They do not care that stealing 43 trillion dollars from the people of America has wreaked tremendous harm on people who have lost their jobs, their homes. their pensions and their saving. And when these psychopaths crash the dollar, the pound and the euro prices double overnight. That will destroy the countries whose people have always protected them from harm.
The majority of Jews do not care about you because are not capable of caring about you. So why do you care for those who do not care for you? Why do you still believe in their lies about the Holohoax and 911? Why do you still believe recovery is just around the corner?
Notes: Annotated Bilderberg 2012 Member List
Annotated Bilderberg 2012 Member List
911: Short And Powerful Questions
911: Short And Powerful Questions
Video: Jews And The African Slave Trade. It Did Not End In 1832
Video: Jews And The African Slave Trade. It Did Not End In 1832
They Dance To Daijal’s (Anti-Christ’s) Tune
They Dance To Daijal’s (Anti-Christ’s) Tune
Holy Holohoax. My Government Wouldn’t Lie To Me.
Holy Holohoax. My Government Wouldn’t Lie To Me.
This video is from an expert on Psychopaths.
3) Philip Green, Jewish Criminality, and the Cost of Economic Parasitism, Part 1: The Wider Context of Jewish White Collar Crime
May 6, 2016 — 56 Comments
Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.
Parasite: (noun) An organism which lives in or on another organism (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other’s expense.
Three years ago I wrote an analysis of the Marc Rich case. I wanted the piece to be as clinical and empirically sound as possible, so I relied heavily on a report authored by government investigators acting for the United States Congress (House Report No. 454: Justice Undone, Clemency Decisions in the Clinton White House United States Congressional Set, No. 14778, Volumes 1—2). The finished piece was not only intended to reveal certain truths about the financial behavior of this particular luminary of the international Jewish community and the elaborate Jewish campaign surrounding his receipt of a Presidential pardon, but also that Jewish behavior in economic and political affairs is often so toxic that exaggeration or even commentary is unnecessary — the facts alone speak volumes. By the Congressional investigator’s own reckoning, the Rich case revealed Jewish communal complicity in large-scale tax evasion, the use of accusations of “anti-Semitism” to stifle criticism, extravagant political influence, and exploitative financial practices that had always walked a legal tightrope. The combined result of these factors was that the Jewish community “lived large” at the expense of ordinary workers and tax-payers. As cash went to Israel, Jewish defense groups, well-catered galas, superyachts, and an array of gaudy baubles. the common American worker was defrauded of millions upon millions of dollars as the sweat on his brow poured forth to benefit a corrupt Judeo-capitalist elite.
Implicit in that article was also the contention that the facets of the Marc Rich case were in many respects typical of the Jewish economic profile. The general features of this profile may be said to involve a marked disposition towards membership of the “super rich,” extravagant use of the “Ponzi” or “pyramid scheme” model, tactical use of bankruptcy, disproportionate use of credit as capital, tax evasion, bank or insurance fraud, fraudulent claims on public money, the use of multiple business names to obscure individual culpability, the exploitation of legal loopholes, the laundering of money via Jewish organizations, the use of Israel as a haven from prosecution, and a complex interplay between Jewish business and Jewish communal and national politics — often involving the formation of alliances with elite politicians. Typically, this latter factor results in the total avoidance of prosecution, or very lenient criminal sentences including early release from prison. As with any legitimate scientific observation, when subject to empirical testing, one would expect to see the same pattern repeated if certain environmental contexts (scale of money involved, level of Jewish identification of the subject etc.) were also similar. Confirming my contention, even very recent history has been replete with a large number of cases possessing almost identical features to the Rich case.
Solomon Dwek ran a wholly imaginary real estate empire, based on the pyramid scheme, under multiple business names. A strongly-identified Jew, he was vice-president of the Deal Yeshiva in New Jersey and was well known for his philanthropy inside the Jewish community. He was eventually taken into custody in 2006 after the FBI discovered he was behind a $400 million investment scheme in properties he never actually owned, and had defrauded PNC Bank by over $50 million dollars. After arrest Dwek attempted to bargain his way to a lighter sentence, eventually turning informant on a wider fraud ring that included over twenty Jewish businessmen and a string of bribed local non-Jewish politicians. Among the FBI’s discoveries following a series of July 2009 arrests were that five Orthodox rabbis were complicit in laundering millions of plundered cash, some from Israel, via their synagogues and religious charities. According to the official complaint, one of them, Edmund Nahum of Brooklyn, apparently told Dwek that he should spread his money through a number of rabbis: “the more it’s spread the better.” Yolie Gertner, who acted as a courier moving laundered cash between the US and Israel, disappeared before just before the July 2009 arrests and is widely believed, as was Marc Rich, to be under the protection of the Israeli authorities.
In one of the FBIs more sinister discoveries, it was also revealed that some of the money found its way to Levy-Izhak Rosenbaum, a Brooklyn Jew who was selling human kidneys on the black market, a trade he later confessed to have been involved in for decades. Ralph J. Marra Jr., the acting United States attorney in New Jersey, stated that Rosenbaum’s “business was to entice vulnerable people to give up a kidney for $10,000, which he would turn around and sell for $160,000.” These gory profits would then be “cleaned” via the synagogues and the cash distributed once more into the Jewish network. Overlapping layers of Jewish political and social influence had concealed this rampant corruption for decades, with Marra stating at a news conference that average citizens “don’t have a chance” against the culture of “influence peddling” the investigation had unearthed. As in the Rich case, this influence extended to grumblings of an anti-Semitic FBI, eventually forcing Weysun Dun, head of the FBI in New Jersey, to state that the FBI had no religious ax to grind. Jewish media commentary sweated at the case’s potential to stir anti-Semitism, with Business Insider writer Moe Tkacik eventually concluding that because Dwek had once given money to the non-Jewish family of a 7-year old boy dying of cancer, the Dwek case might not be as bad as it could be since “the kid was a goy. The goyim totally lose it over stories like this.”
Astute readers will see the tactical advantages of comparatively minimal and occasional Jewish donations to emotive non-Jewish causes. In keeping with the pattern witnessed in the Rich case, although initially facing 30 years behind bars, Dwek walked free after 30 months.
In a separate but again almost identical case, Steven Byers and Joseph “Yossi” Shereshevsky, co-founders of Wex-Trust, were charged in 2008 with defrauding more than 1,100 investors of about $255 million in a real estate pyramid scheme. The Jewish community of Norfolk, Virginia, from which the pair operated, immediately closed ranks. Refusing to co-operate with the authorities, The Virginian Pilot reported that “at the first Saturday service after Shereshevsky’s arrest, Rabbi Chaim Silver reminded the B’nai Israel congregation that
Judaism forbids lashon hara, otherwise known as gossip or evil speech.”
What The Virginian Pilot wasn’t apparently aware of was that lashon hara has a specific meaning in the context of scrutiny by non-Jews, in the sense that the Talmudic consensus on Leviticus/Vaikra 19:16 is that it is forbidden to speak ill of fellow Jews to the Gentiles. It is thus an injunction to close ranks and protect the group rather than a general injunction against gossip. Part of it also lay in that fact that, like Rich and Dwek, both were pillars of the Jewish community and heavily invested much of their ill-gotten wealth into communal assets. The pair helped establish an Orthodox day school in Portsmouth named after Shereshevsky’s father, the Rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky Institute of Mesorah Learning. The pair also sponsored a summer day camp for local children, and even sent a private jet to Jamaica to rescue an Orthodox teen who said he was being abused at a reform school. Wex-Trust was itself a communal enterprise, with The Virginian Pilot reporting that the pair assembled a sales team that “included the scions of some of the region’s prominent Orthodox families.” When the scheme began unravelling in August 2008, the FBI apprehended Shereshevsky while he was, like Marc Rich and Yolie Gertner, leaving for Israel. He had no return ticket.
I could continue with similar cases like that of Marc Dreier whose specialty was defrauding hedge funds from which he stole $400 million, Sholam Weissan expert in insurance fraud, or Sholom Rubashkin whose kosher meat business was steeped in bank fraud, money laundering and the use of illegal immigrants and child labor. I could spend many hundreds of pages exploring the activities of Scott Rothstein, who led an extravagant lifestyle and pumped millions into Jewish causes while heading a $1.2 billion pyramid scheme. That’s without even casting a glance at the cases of Samuel “Mouli” Cohen, Nevin Shapiro, Steve Cohen and Michael Steinberg, Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, Eric Stein, Eliyahu Weinstein, Sam Israel, Samuel D. Waksal, Martin Frankel, Simon Feldman, Jeffrey Greenstein, Cary Feldman, Chaim Mayer Lebovits, Bernie Madoff, David and Donna Levy, Frederick D. Berg, Lou Pearlman, Andrew Rosenfeld, Jordan Belfort, and Timothy Roth.
Before counter-arguments are made that these crimes and activities are the sins of bankers and lawyers rather than Jews, consider the following cases from a range of professions and try to find another link. David Silverstein was an already wealthy Washington chiropractor but made fraudulent welfare claims in order to pad his lifestyle a little more. Georgia chiropractor Andrew Sokol made over $6.5 million before he got caught. New Jersey chiropractor Scott Greenberg made more than half a million dollars in insurance scams before he was detected. Another New Jersey chiropractor, Daniel Dahan, almost made it to $4 million. In Brooklyn, dentist Lawrence J. Bruckner was convicted of defrauding the Medicaid program by paying people $25–$30 to solicit homeless Medicaid patients and billing taxpayers under his son’s name for services never provided. Together with three other Jewish dentists, including his son, the group stole around $6.3 million from Medicaid. By 2014 the problem of Jewish abuses of Medicaid in this manner reached a stage were a further four Russian-Jewish dentists were arrested under the instruction of the Attorney General. Outside Brooklyn, in Jacksonville, Florida, Howard Schneider was being arrested for identical crimes.
Despite lackluster Jewish apologetics on this issue (Abraham Foxman’s Jews and Money: Story of a Stereotype bring a particularly risible example) white-collar crime and a seemingly insatiable drive for wealth accumulation has been well-established by empirical academic studies as the most prominent feature of the Jewish socio-criminal profile. In 1971 A. Menachem of the Berkeley School of Criminology published a study in Issues in Criminology titled “Criminality Among Jews: An Overview.” In this study, Menachem argued that ‘the Jewish crime rate tends to be higher than that of non-Jews and other religious groups for white-collar offenses, that is, commercial or commercially related crimes, such as fraud, fraudulent bankruptcy, and embezzlement.” In 1988, Yale University’s Stanton Wheeler published “White-Collar Crimes and Criminals” for the Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. Among Wheeler’s findings were that while Protestants and Catholics were under-represented among white-collar criminals relative to their share of the population, Jews were over-represented to a very large degree (2% of the population, 15.2% of white-collar convictions). Wheeler states that “It would be a fair summary of our data to say that, demographically speaking, white-collar offenders are predominantly middle-aged white males with an over-representation of Jews.”
While Stanton’s statistics are enlightening in themselves, a more detailed picture emerges in David Weisburd’s Yale-published Crimes of the Middle Classes: White-Collar Offenders in the Federal Courts (1991). Here Weisburd informs us that although Jews comprise only around 2% of the United States population, they contribute at least 9% of lower category white-collar crimes (bank embezzlement, tax fraud and bank fraud), at least 15% of moderate category white-collar crimes (mail fraud, false claims, and bribery), and at least 33% of high category white-collar crimes (antitrust and securities fraud). Weisburg’s updated data showed that overall, Jews were responsible for an astonishing 23.9% of financial crime in America.
Given the statistical data, not to mention the well-charted historical trajectory of Jewish financial behavior, the argument that a Jewish predilection for financial misdeeds is a mere “canard” is totally unsustainable. The “canard” strategy in fact perpetuates a fallacy designed to conceal widespread crimes of considerable cost to non-Jews, and should itself be seen as an extension of the Jewish socio-criminal profile.
Contrary to Jewish accounts and apologetics, it is actually empirical data, rather than blind prejudice, that suggests that Jewish economic activity is disproportionately criminal and, indeed, parasitic. Given that a large amount of narrative evidence and anecdotal case studies indicate that the majority of illegal monies are diverted into Jewish causes to serve Jewish interests, it is clear that Jewish financial criminality involves a large transfer of wealth from non-Jewish economies to more insular Jewish micro-economies. Combining the Yale studies with FBI estimates that white-collar crime costs the United States more than $300 billion annually, and taking into consideration the great preponderance of Jews in the worst tier of financial crime, one arrives at the conclusion that the financial burden of detected Jewish white-collar criminality is somewhere between $75–$100 billion each year. Figures from other White nations can be considered to be proportionally similar given the pattern of Jewish wealth worldwide. This figure also doesn’t take into account those Jews whose endeavors remain undetected, or those whose practices are deeply immoral but manage somehow to stay on the lucky side of the law. And it is to an example of one of these malicious but “at large” characters that we now turn our attention.
 A. Menachem, “Criminality Among Jews: An Overview,” Issues in Criminality, Volume 6, Issue 2, (Summer 1971), pp.1-39.
 D. Weisburg, Crimes of the Middle Classes: White-Collar Offenders in the Federal Courts (Yale University Press, 1991), p.72
 For example, across Europe, between 1881 and 1914, Jews were over-represented in bankruptcy, forgery, fraud and libel. See P. Knepper, The Invention of International Crime: A Global Issue in the Making, 1881-1914, (Palgrave MacMillan, 2010), p.80. The trend, of course, went much further back in history.
3b) Philip Green, Jewish Criminality, and the Cost of Economic Parasitism, Part 2
May 8, 2016 — 26 Comments
Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.
Philip Green possesses an appearance so darkly befitting a caricature that one might see it, like the stripes of a wasp, as a warning from Nature itself. But even had this son of the Talmud emerged from the womb looking like a Swedish prince his life trajectory would have still borne the stamp of his racial origins. Green was born on 1952 in Croydon, in south London, the son of a retailer and property speculator. At the age of nine he was sent to the Jewish boarding school Carmel College in Oxfordshire, the most expensive school in all of England until it closed in 1995. As his biographer Stewart Lansley points out, Green is no ‘self-made” man. Few Jews ever are — the entire concept of the ‘self-made man” is rooted in individualistic rather than close-knit societies. When his father died, Green inherited the family business at the age of twelve and had access to a substantial estate. More importantly, Green was born into a close-knit community of Jewish businessmen and speculators, all of whom had access to credit networks and financial knowledge beyond the means of non-Jews. Assured of the support of these networks, Green left Carmel College at 15 to work for a co-ethnic shoe importer. By his late teens he was travelling to the US, Europe and the Far East. On his return, at age 21, he set up his first business with a £20,000 loan backed by more communally pooled funds, importing jeans from the Far East to sell on to London retailers.
photo: Green and Tony Blair
Aside from pooling funds as a group for initial capital, the Jewish ‘talent” for business is rooted in a gambler’s addictive personality and a heavy interest in speculation and exploitation. Speculation involves a high level of risk, but such risk-taking is cushioned by being enmeshed in a communal mutual aid and cooperation network, so that failure may only be a temporary setback — yet another example of the power of collectivist strategies.
Confirming my contention, I could point out that almost every historical statistical enquiry into bankruptcy statistics has found Jews to be significantly over-represented in both fraudulent and genuine bankruptcies (almost ten times the rate of non-Jews). Jewish economic “genius” can thus be more accurately described as a rash drive to accumulate wealth, as well as an acute willingness to take advantage of the weak, especially those who have succumbed to debt. In 1979, Green exhibited his first stroke of such “genius” when he used his pool of funds to buy up the entire stock of ten designer label clothes sellers who had gone into receivership for extremely low prices. The stock was old and far from ideal, but he had the clothes sent to the dry cleaners, wrapped them in polythene to make them look new, and then bought a place to sell them to the public.
He soon became a commercial predator. As Britain was hit hard by recession in the early 1980’s Green went on the prowl for new shops to lay the foundations of an embryonic clothing discount chain. He used the gray or unofficial markets to import high-end garments cheaply, ignored existing trade agreements between boutiques and designers, and sold them off in tacky bargain stores with names like “Bond Street Bandit.” With the profits, he sought out more despairing retailers to prey upon. Once he occupied their premises, he would use them to sell something relatively new to the British market — cheap, Chinese-made jeans. Lansley describes Green as a “prophet of globalization,” a description that I am apt to agree with. Swimming in the profits from Chinese jeans, Green soon expanded again, this time using cheap Israeli loans.
Before long, Green and his backers had taken over almost every major British clothing retailer, forming the Arcadia Group as an umbrella organization to oversee the new empire. He was by now a billionaire. Green found himself the darling of the agents of globalism and a string of politicians and celebrities mesmerized by the trappings of wealth. Possessing little in the way of subtlety, Green became well-known for his extravagant parties, where guests included supermodels and Oscar winners, and the entertainment was live performances by the likes of Stevie Wonder and Rod Stewart, among others. For his son’s Bar Mitzvah in 2005, Green spent over $5 million on a French Riviera party featuring performances by Andrea Bocelli and Destiny’s Child. Extravagant, of course, but money was plentiful because Green and his associates had found a way to escape paying around £300 million in taxes.
photo: Green and Bill Clinton
In an excellent article in The Guardian, journalist Michael White writes that British Prime Ministers Tony Blair and David Cameron were “in thrall to Green,” a man he describes as a “tax-dodging, undeserving parasite” and whose taste in material goods is “embarrassingly vulgar.” According to White, Blair was a “credulous sucker for a rich man with tax-shy habits,” giving Green a knighthood in 2006.
The advent of Sir Philip Green was a mockery indeed given that the concept of the “knighthood” originated in the Middle Ages, when it was conferred upon a man for service to his country, normally in a military capacity. By the Late Middle Ages, the rank had become associated with the ideals of chivalry, a code of conduct for the perfect courtly Christian warrior. Contrast this with our greasy merchant, who was by 2006 well-known for a tax-avoidance dividend scheme that enabled him to profit from foreign-made goods being sold in Britain, without paying any tax into the British system. Green, however, fits the pattern of other figures we have examined in that he facilitates the transfer of wealth from non-Jewish economies to Jewish micro-economies. To cite just one example, there is his £5 million donation to Jewish Care.
But Green now finds national attention on him for even worse reasons. In 2000 Green acquired British Home Stores (BHS) at a time when it enjoyed a £5 million surplus. During the next sixteen years, according to Michael White, Green “milked BHS until it was on its knees.” Employing a number of complex and deeply immoral practices, this vampire withdrew over £580 million from the company, plundering every one of its assets including its worker’s pension funds. Once the company was on the brink of collapse, Green sold it for £1 to Retail Acquisitions, a hastily put-together company led by former bankrupt and fellow Jew Dominic Chappell and Jewish lawyer Mark Tasker. When BHS finally went under, more than thirty thousand people were left with an empty pension fund while Green continued to live a life of luxury in off-shore tax havens. This from a man who received a knighthood for “services to retail.”
While Britain reels in shock from these developments, I am far from surprised. I am sure that the readers of TOO will join me in a feeling of “I told you so,” though one of exasperation rather than satisfaction. We are only too familiar with these patterns of parasitic plunder. But what final conclusions can we draw? In the 1890s the German Social Democrats originated the phrase “Anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools.” The term has always amused me because socialism professes to be against the worst excesses of capitalism and yet refuses to act against that race which is quite evidently behind an inordinate percentage of these excesses. We might thus conclude, paraphrasing the Social Democratic simpletons of a century and more ago, that ‘socialism without antisemitism is the work of fools.” And may Mr Philip Green yet meet his reckoning.
 A.E. Steinweis, Studying the Jew: Scholarly anti-Semitism in Nazi Germany, (Harvard University Press, 2006), p.139.
 L. Barclay, The Unauthorized Guide to Doing Business the Philip Green Way, (Capstone, 2010), p.134-5.