I. MOJMIR BABACEK – MIND CONTROL COMPILATION ARTICLE
July 6, 2012
fight government secrecy
Please, see as well the message below the notes of the article (info missing)
means of information war threaten democracy and mankind
Mojmir Babacek (edited by John Allman and Rudy Andria)
This article has been deleted from websites of the Australian magazine New Dawn, Canadian Global Research and Czech internet newspaper Britske Listy because the authorities were afraid that it contains information convincing enough to alarm readers to the fact that their minds could be manipulated by their governments. Democracy is in danger, so forward this article to your friends. The article is being disseminated on Facebook across the globe.
The report on U.S. military policy by “Project for New American Century” states: “It is now commonly understood that information and other new technologies … are creating a dynamic that may threaten America’s ability to exercise its dominant military power. Potential rivals, such as China are anxious to exploit those transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons … the effects of information and other advanced technologies promise to revolutionize the nature of conventional armed forces” (ref. 13, pg. 4 and 11). The military concept of information technologies is, however, kept hidden from the world general public.
In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya, in the article “Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse” (1), informed that in 1996 Russian government’s information agency FAPSI warned that the effect of “informational means of war” is comparable to “the effect of the use of weapon of mass destruction” and produced a report entitled “Information Weapon as a Threat to National Security of Russia”. In reaction, the Russian State Duma and consequently , the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed the United Nations, OBSE and the European Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the development and use of informational weapons. According to the same newspaper Segodnya in March 1998, the matter was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the agenda of the General Assembly of the U.N. Most probably the USA vetoed this proposal and in consequence, the ban of informational weapons was not discussed by the United Nations General Assembly.
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation, signed by President Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational security of the Russian Federation, there is “the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life and to individual, group and societal consciousness” by “illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness.” (16). Among “the main areas of international cooperation of the Russian Federation in the field of information security” , is listed “banning the development, proliferation and application of ‘information weapons’ ” (17).
In the article under discussion Segodnya described “mysterious information-psychological” means capable not only of harming human health, but also of blocking human free will at the subconscious level, impairing human beings’ ability of “political, cultural and other self-identification” and even “causing destruction of indivisible informational and spiritual space of the Russian Federation”. According to Russian scientist A. F. Okhatrin, those means are also capable to kill people (2). Underneath the article, Segodnya published a review of weapons affecting human psyche which it obtained from the Russian Department of Defense. Together with ultrasound and microwave weapons, there are also “psychotronic weapons” which, in addition to having the capability of “transfering information among people”, are able to act on communication and electronic systems (1).
The Space Preservation Bill proposed by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001, names the following technologies enabling access to the human brain, human health impairment or the killing of people: “land-based, sea-based or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons or populations” (4). “Psychotronic weapon” listed in the Dennis J. Kucinich’s bill is described as a weapon using “torsion fields” radiation in the book “Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia” (6) by Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov and Vladimir Lopatin (a politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States). Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche those two authors list “generators of physical fields” of “known as well as unknown nature” (14). It is common knowledge that both KGB and CIA carried out a large-scale research of psychotronic phenomena in the 70’s of the past century. It is not out of question that their scientists succeded in discovering the physical basis of those phenomena. In the 80’s the research did not continue, but the number of people complaining that their nervous system is manipulated from outside started growing from the begining of this decade.
Among the known physical concepts non-local electron and photon connection can be used to explain telepathy. The ability of sound and light technologies to influence human psyche is exemplified by Psychowalkman industry. The existence of the electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed in the STOA report on crowd control technologies (40), Conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma  and can be deduced as well from scientific and military literature.
Nerve impulses in the brain are carried by electrical signals triggered by changes in chemical balance. During the fifties and sixties of the past century, it was proved that human nervous system and behavior can be thoroughly controlled by electric signals imported to the brain by tiny electrodes (41). 100 stimulations of one point in the bull‘s brain made him 100 times bellow. When a man was asked to straighten his hand the bending of which was stimulated he replied “I think your electricity is stronger than my will.” By means of electrical stimulation of the brain the rhythm of breathing and heart beat [this was even stopped for several pulses] was affected as well as the function of the most of the viscera – like the secretion of the gall bladder. The stimulation of areas in the brain where feelings and emotions reside produced decisions. A passive, depressed woman tore up a piece of paper when her center of anger was stimulated: “I did not control myself. I had to get up and tear”, she commented. An aggressive woman, with the same area stimulated, got up and smashed against the wall the guitar she was playing until the moment of stimulation. The intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob which reduced or increased the intensity of the electric current. When the pleasure area was stimulated women offered marriage to therapists. Stimulation of a particular area in a female monkey‘s brain ended her motherly care for a newborn baby. When the limbic system was stimulated the patients vigilance weakened, they lost the ability to think, they often began to undress or grope and when the stimulation stopped they could not remember what was happening. The signals had to be delivered in specific frequencies to produce repetitive action of neurons. Spanish scientist Jose Delgado became world known when he, with the use of this technology, made a bull attack him by pressing one button on the small black box and stopped the bull few feet away from him by pressing another button.
The idea that electric currents in the brain could be induced by electromagnetic energy is obviously subsequent step in this path of research. The information inside of the brain is processed digitally; in other words analog perceptions are “translated” and transferred by a number and frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the feeling or perception usually corresponds to the intensity of electrical current. Walter J. Freeman, who had been for years measuring the brain activity in reaction to different stimuli by multitudes of microelectrodes, presented already in 1975 a hypothesis “that a novel external stimulus is broadly transmitted from the primary sensory cortex or thalamus to other parts of the cortex… transmission occurs at some characteristic frequency, and…reception occurs in … sets tuned to that frequency” (37). In other words, when neurons cooperate in the processing of specific information they synchronize their activity and oscillate in the same frequency. In an experiment by Wolf Singer (20) the differences in brain activity in reaction to two different stimuli, presented to the tested subject at the same time, were represented by two different groups of neurons oscillating in different frequencies. In the modern scientific literature synchronization of frequencies of emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain as a principle of brain functioning is generally accepted (19). Electroencephalographers have no doubt that those synchronizations appear on the EEG recordings and are already able to “read” in those frequencies the single letters of a word perceived by the tested subject (21). Theoretically this means that the events in the brain can be produced “synthetically” from the outside when additional energy is pumped into the brain in specific frequencies corresponding to specific brain activities. John Marks, in his book on CIA mind control research, quotes one of the CIA research veterans recalling a colleague’s joke: “If you could find the natural radio frequency of a person‘s sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast” (22). Since most of the activity of human brain takes place in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz and electromagnetic waves of this frequency are hundreds and even thousands of miles long, and, for that matter, could not target human brain, scientists started experimenting with pulsed microwaves. There are “window” microwave frequencies which penetrate deep enough into the brain tissue to produce activity of neurons there.
The interaction of electromagnetic radiation and chemicals in the brain was proved for example by the experiment where irradiation of rats’ heads by 20 and 40 mW/cm2 microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz woke the rats up in 5 minutes from narcosis (23). Electrical signals of neurons in the brain are mediated by chemicals called neurotransmitters. At a conference on “Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine” in 1989 Capt. Paul Tyler, director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project between 1970 and 1977, quoted in his lecture the research of Dr. Merrit who measured the decrease of norepinephrine, serotonine and dopamine when a field of 80 mW/cm2 was applied (24). All those hormones act as neurotransmitters into the cortex. Dopamin influences the ability to learn and other cognitive abilities. Disruption in the biosynthesis or transmission of dopamine can lead to Parkinson’s disease. In another experiment a 500Hz signal produced release of neradrenaline in sympathetical neurons (25). Since those neurons control the muscles of internal organs and noraderenaline acts there as a neurotransmitter, an oposite signal should be able to reduce the activity of internal organs and eventually impair human health. The publication of the World Health Organization on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on living organisms from 1981 (25) gives many examples of the effects of microwave radiation on the excretion of glands and chemical composition of blood. Many of those effects could harm human health. Microwave radiation can also affect molecules of DNA and thus affect the development of organisms (25). This was proved by an experiment by Yale neurophysiologist, Jose Delgado, where the irradiation of chicken embryos by 10, 100 and 1000 Hz stopped their development including the development of hearts and veins. The experiment was replicated by the American Navy with the same results. Such attack by microwaves could have, in the long run, disastrous impact on targeted populations.
As a matter of fact microwave radiation can produce many deadly effects. In the experiment by McAffee already mentioned, the microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz produced impairment in breathing (even leading to suffocation) in rats. A similar signal could also suffocate human beings. At the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1983 the experiment was presented where blood clots were formed by microwave radiation (26). This capability is also suitable for weaponisation. Similarly dangerous is the finding of Allan Frey that radio frequency radiation can weaken the blood-brain barrier that prevents poisonous chemicals from the access into the brain (30). In 1986 the American Air Force issued a book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18). The chapter “Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict”, was written by Capt. Paul Tyler, who had been the director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project from 1970 until 1977. At the beginning of the chapter, Capt. Tyler quotes a source entitled “Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000” that had been issued by American Air Force in 1982: “Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats … the passage of approximately 100 miliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death … A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse width, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency.”
In less draconian assault, the use of microwaves could be limited just to the influence of human behavior. In 1985 Kathleen McAuliffe visited Jose Delgado in his laboratory in Spain, where he experimented with electromagnetic stimulation of brain. She subsequently wrote an article for the magazine OMNI (27). Jose Delgado showed her how he could make an ape fall asleep, or make it overactive, or how he could calm down fighting fish using suitably modulated microwave radiation.
The next series of experiments shows that human behavior can be controlled in even more intricate ways. In 1962 Allan H. Frey published in the “Journal of Applied Physiology” (28) the results of experimentation with transmission of sounds into the brain by electromagnetic radiation at a distance of up to 1000 feet. The “electromagnetic” sounds were heard by deaf as well as hearing people. In his report, Frey writes that, by then, only the visual system had been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy and he noted that, “With somewhat different transmission parameters we can induce the perception of severe buffeting of the head..” and ”Changing … parameters again, one can induce a ‘pins-and-needles’ sensation.” Frey’s experiment was replicated several times by other scientists (28). Another, more advanced experiment that involved the transmission of radio modulated with audible sounds into the brain, was published only inadvertently in 1975, when Don R. Justesen published, in the article on “Microwaves and Behavior” (29), the result of an experiment described to him over the telephone conversation by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who worked on a secret military project Pandora. Joseph C. Sharp at the Walter Reed Army Institute improved the method of Frey to the point that he was able to transmit into the experimental subject’s brain words which he could understand. The ability of U.S. military to produce perception of speech in humans by microwave radiation substantiates the article by Sharon Weinberger, “Mind Games”, which was published in The Washington Post in January 2007. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for the article the Air Force released “records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects” The article also states that “the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials” (31).
Robert Becker, who was twice nominated for Nobel price for his share in the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, wrote in his book (30) about the experiment by J. F. Schapitz, who stated: “In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconcscious parts of the human brain – i. e. without employing any technical devices for receiving or transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a chance to control the information input consciously.” In one of the four experiments subjects were given a test of hundred questions, ranging from easy to technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being irradiated, they would be subjected to information beams suggesting the answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for some of their correct answers, and memory falsification for other correct answers. After 2 weeks they had to pass the test again (30). The results of those experiments were never published. It is rather evident that in those experiments the messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound frequencies which the human brain perceives, but of which the subject is unaware. According to Russian newspapers, in this way, people may be programmed to perform different actions in the same way people can be programmed under hypnosis. In Moscow there exists Psychocorrection Center, where this method is used to heal psychical diseases such as alcoholism. The use of this method was questioned in the Russian press when general Lev Rokhlin was killed by his wife in his sleep at 2 a.m. after she had had a casual telephone conversation with a female friend. Did her friend use a sequence of words which were supposed to trigger the murderous action? Before his murder General Rokhlin planned for army protests against army reform and visited editor’s desks of Russian newspapers, telling them he might be soon killed in a car accident, during a drinking spree or during an argument with his wife (42).
In his other book “Cross Currents” Robert Becker presents the report coming from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute, where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the transmission of words into the brain by radiofrequency radiation. The report deals with the effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous system and describes the division of testing program into four parts: 1) prompt debilitating effects; 2) prompt stimulation auditory effects; 3) work interference (stoppage) effects; 4) effects on stimulus controlled behavior. The report presents this conclusion: “Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electrical stimulation unrelated to heat” (32).
In the second volume of the Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Sysmes of the American Air Force it is stated: “While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields…” (33). In the second volume of the report the research was evaluated as “progressing according to the schedule or in advance” and was supposed to be terminated in 2010.
In the Soviet Russia the ongoing research in this area was completely hidden from the public, but change of political system and actual use of this equipment during the putsch against Gorbachov brought this subject to newspapers headlines. According to Russian daily newspapers, during the failed coup d’etat against Gorbachov, General Kobets warned the defenders of the Russian White House that mind control technology could be used against them. After the putsch, respected Russian scientist Victor Sedlecki published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda that psychotronic biogenerators were mass produced in the Soviet Union and were used during the failed coup d’etat , but failed to succeed due to the inexperience of the personel who operated them. In the following spree of articles on the subject of mind control, the experiment was published where manipulation of masses of people by microwave radiation was performed. Already in 1974, after successful testing on a military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves. Apparently, in 1974, the entire military unit was put to sleep (5).
In the book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18), Captain Tyler also wrote: “Because of the many parameters involved and the apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific response. The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or unconventional” (18). If you object that the range of frequencies in which the human nervous system works is too narrow to provide for such a wide choice of reactions, Capt. Tyler writes: “There are unconfirmed reports that change of 0.01 Hz can make a difference.” Since many activities of human brain are represented by different sequences of frequencies, this provides for further large choices.
At the end of 1994 the first tests of the most powerful radar system in the world were carried out in Alaska. This year its power should reach 10 billion watts and later 100 billion watts. The main features of the system include its ability to heat the ionosphere and in this way change the altitude of the ionosphere. By this kind of manipulation of the ionosphere, it is possible to bounce the electromagnetic waves back from the ionosphere to whichever region of the planet one wishes to target. According to the official information by the U.S. government the system HAARP is designed for scientific research. However, there are too many facts suggesting that the major reason for its construction are military purposes. The main patent of Bernard J. Eastlund (number 4,686,605) proposes the use of the system for destruction of navigation systems of airplanes and missiles wherever in the atmosphere they might be, and for interference with all communication systems anywhere on the planet, and the global weather control. Other patents connected with the system propose the use of the system for induction of detonations in the extent of nuclear explosions and other military uses (33).
Evidently, the warning of Russian intelligence agency FAPSI to the Russian government and the article in the Russian daily “Segodnya” were direct recations to the installation of the U.S. HAARP system. The HAARP system can start pulsing microwave radiation with one thousandth of one Hertz and this means that, when raising pulsing frequencies, it can change pulses of microwave radiations by one thousandths of one Hertz and can control the activity of human brain in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hertz which are crucial for functioning of human nervous system. In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who apparently worked on the American Navy’s project of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons “Sleeping Beauty”, published, in a scientific magazine Perception and Motor Skills the article where he states: “the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible” (34).
John B. Alexander, who later became the Director of Non-lethal Programs in Los Alamos National Laboratory, wrote in his article in the Military Review in the year 1980: “whoever makes the first major breakthrough in this field will have a quantum lead over his opponent, an advantage similar to sole possession of nuclear weapons” (35). Samuel Koslov, a leading personality of the Pandora project that was dedicated to research of effects of microwave radiation on humans, and a researcher at the John Hopkins University, in his closing speech at the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1984, said that the conference had proven that the external electric fields can “become a key to the cellular control console. The implications, social, economic, and even military are enormous.” Koslov went on: “If much of what we have heard is indeed correct, it may be not less significant to the nation than the prospects that faced the physics community in 1939 when the long-time predicted fissionability of the nucleus was actually demonstrated. You may recall the famous letter of Albert Einstein to President Roosvelt. When we’re in a position to do so in terms of our proofs, I would propose that an analogous letter is required” (26).
It is this perspective, of the revolutionary nature of these scientific developments, that gives us the title, “Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”, of a book published by the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College in 1994 (36). Since the national security information is in question, the book cannot tell the readers what technology exactly is making this revolution feasible. From the beginning the authors were aware that the use of this technology may run counter to basic moral and political values of the American society, and in consequence the revolution in military affairs would require a moral and political revolution to come first: ”In the pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic… Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic ”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed.” Since it is difficult for them to imagine that the American society would accept the ethical and political revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they develop a scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders to back this revolution. The scenario is placed into the year 2000, and is based on the situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality. In the document Rebuilding Americas Defenses, backed by the past U.S. government, we read: “To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must … seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs … Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” (ref. 13, pg. 51). Was it by accident that in 2001 a massive terrorist attack ocurred in the USA facilitated by questionable work of U.S. intelligence services and explosives in the World Trade Center and followed by anthrax attacks where the only indicted scientist, Bruce Ivins, did not have the technical means and scientific knowledge to turn the anthrax spores into a deadly aerosol which was used and that those two attacks were followed by an assault on privacy of U.S. Citizens and international law?
The scenario goes on: “The president was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in military affairs) in conflict short of war … As technology changed the way force was applied, things such as personal courage, face-to-face leadership, and the ‘warfighter’ mentality became irrelevant.” So the psychotechnology, which formed the core of the RMA, provided new methods for influencing the psyche of the adversary, in place of the classical strategy to make him fear his death. The book goes on: “Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each. There is also potential for defensive psychotechnology such as ‘strategic personality simulations’ to aid national security decision makers.” (See Norman D. Livergood and Stephen D. Williams, “Strategic Personality Simulation: A New Strategic Concept”, unpublished draft paper, Carlisle Barracks, PAK: U.S. Army War College, 1994). Human behovior and thinking is substantially controlled by emotions. If simulated emotions are broadcasted into somebody’s nervous system they will orient his thinking and behavior. Thoughts are another organizer of human behavior and personal thoughts can be overridden by ultrasound messages. In other words if there was, for example, a new Jesus Christ, U.S. agencies would simply engineer his personality to make sure he would not introduce any cultural changes. Once the strategy of computerized personality simulation is applied, the unfolding of human history will be totally controlled by elites having exclusive access to those technologies. The conclusion of the authors was: “Whether we opt for revolution or evolution, change will occur.”
The concept of the “strategic personality stimulation” is probably tested on some of the people in the USA who claim to be mind control experiments victims, whose number, rapidly growing after 9/11 attacks, inspired the article in Washington Post, entitled “Mind Games” (31) in 2007. Cheryl Welsh, the director of the American organization Mind Justice (38) claims that she has received over 2500 complaints from U.S. citizens. Though some of those people may be mentally ill, many of them defend themselves in a rational way that suggests that they may be mentally sound. The same situation is in Russia. Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin even admitted nonconsensual human-subject experiments had been conducted in Russia, when he wrote in the quoted book: “Compensation of damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation of persons suffering from destructive informational influence must be realized in legal trial…” (14). Growing numbers of complaints are coming as well from China, India and Japan (over 200).
The European Parliament reacted to the installation of HAARP system by calling for “an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” (15, Paragraph 27). The body of the European Parliament STOA (Scientific and Technolgical Options Assessment) in the document “Crowd Control Technologies”, stated that „some of these concerns… have been more specifically covered by the resolution on legal aspects of military activities passed at the meeting of the EP_s Foreign Affairs, Security and defence Policy which called for an international convention and global ban on all research and development , whether civilian or military , which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems. (40, pg CII, ref. 369). The „actual“ deployment of those means confirmed US Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of a Bill introduced into the US Congress in October 2001 proposing a ban on the deployment of “mind control” weapons, when he was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and “those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don’t stop the weaponisation of space” (10).
Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of the functioning of human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in the USA (8) and all technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to the same law in the Russian Federation (9). Under such conditions, the mass media cannot fully disclose the existence and capacities of those technologies and world public cannot be engaged in favour of a ban on the use of such capabilities. The ownership of those technologies gives opportunity to governments to use them against individuals (and eventually against masses), without giving them any access to any legal remedy. The concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is fundamentally corrupted in this way. In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma stated that capabilities enabling remote control of human nervous system or the remote infliction of health impairment are available to many modern governments (3). This was confirmed by the article from the U.S. army weekly Defense News stating that mind control technologies were used by the Israelis against the Palestinians (12). As well ousted Hunduran president Manuel Zelaya, while under siege in Brazilian embassy in Honduras, complained that he had been subjected to an “electron bombardment with microwaves” which produces “headache and organic destabilisation” (44). When asked by Amy Goodman from Democracy Now: „As president, do you know about this in the Honduran arsenal?” He replied: „Yes, of course“ (45).
Evidently the secret arms race among the world governments may continue until the information war actually breaks out. V. Lopatin, in the book “Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia”, stated that psychotronic war is, as a matter of fact, “already taking place without declaration of war”. In this way the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an “information war” or, in the worst case, into the reality where large masses of people will be killed, and unlike the aftermath of the use of nuclear weapons, the planet will still remain inhabitable for the survivors.
With emerging energetic, financial and climate crises either the next world war could erupt, or the means of remote manipulation of human brains and organisms could be applied to control dissatisfied citizens. In the conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma it is stated: “Phone lines, heating and sewer pipes, TVs, fire signalisation can be used as transmitting antennas” (3). Our elected democratic representatives are responsible for foreseeing the emerging crises and preventing them from happening by appropriate measures. However, they do not have mandate from citizens to allow those crises to happen, and then use technologies of mind manipulation to do away with citizen’s dissatisfaction. If this technology is once used against citizens it is questionable whether true democracy will be restored one day. The countries with the most advanced military technologies include the USA, which has never proposed any international initiative aimed at securing the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human beings. According to the study “Crowd Control Technologies” published by the European Parliament’s STOA office, the USA are the major promoter of the use of those arms. (In fact, it was principally the efforts of the USA government to persuade this outcome that ensured the inclusion in NATO military doctrine of non-lethal technology.) The STOA states: “In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals”; and “In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency weapons”. Directed energy system is further defined: „Directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level“ (40).
According to the Russian government intelligence agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the means of informational war grew fourfold and at the present time they occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3). Though there are concepts of informational warfare other than the remote control of human beings, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains suggests an intention to use those means in internal as well as in international affairs. If the USA achieve essential military preeminence in this area and if no global ban of the use of those technologies against civilians is negotiated, the USA may become a world totalitarian superpower of the new type.
So far the only government who made a small step toward the ban of those technologies is the Russian Federation where the addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons” was approved on July 26, 2001. The legislation states: “within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects … the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations…”. Besides omitting the use of the term “psychotronic energy” that both Lopatin and Kucinich used, the Russian legislation does not provide any means for Russian citizens to defend themselves against the use of those weapons. Nor is there any compulsion upon the police or public health organizations to set up teams capable of detecting radiation that was enabling remote manipulation of human body and nervous system, or the source of such radiation. Nor does this legislation prohibit Russian government agencies from the use of such technology against their own citizens. In the USA alone, some of the federal states have enacted in their laws on firearms, new standards on electric and electromagnetic weapons (Michigan in 2003, Massachusetts in 2004, Maine in 2005). Sanctions go from 15 years in jail to life imprisonment, identically with weapons of mass destruction. As in Russia, those laws do not provide for the defense of citizens against the use of those weapons by government agencies.
On February 25, 2009 Deputy Chief of General Staff of Russian Army, Anatoli Nogovicyn, stated that within 2 or 3 years a full fledged war in informational sphere, including “information-psychlogical influence on population and military units” may break out (39). So far politicians (especially in the USA) have not shown responsible intention to take action to stop this new arms race, which threatens to place human beings in a position subsidiary to machines and to destroy democracy. Humanitarian organizations apparently do not dare to challenge this National Security Information (on several occasions Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have refused to engage with this issue). Under such circumstances, it is left to citizens themselves to organize defense of their freedoms and elementary human rights, before those technologies are used at war or to suppress their dissatisfaction with governments who failed to prevent the emerging crises. They should coordinate their efforts internationally if they want to succeed.
1) web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original – “Riders of Psychotronic”, concise English translation of “Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse” at – mojmir.webuda.com
2) web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original: “Zombeing Bluff or” – concise English translation of the article “The Project Zombie is a Bluff or…?” – mojmir.webuda.com
3) see Russian original “Dokument” – web.iol.cz/mhzzrz, translation – “State Duma” – mojmir.webuda.com
5) web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original “Installation Radiosleep”, concise English translation mojmir.webuda.com – “Installation Radiosleep”
6) www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 27-37 concise overview of the book other excerpts you will find at the address mojmir.webuda.com
7) Russian original – web.io.cz.mhzzrz : “Authors of Project Zombie”, concise English translation – mojmir.webuda.com – “Authors of Project Zombie Discovered in Kiev”.
8) web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – see memorandum of the Department of the Air Force, Assembly State of New York and Communicating via the Microwave Auditory Effect or article „Mind Games“ in Washington Post from January 2006, where an experiment with microwave transmission of spoken phrases into the human brain was published as well as the fact that this technology is subject to the National Security Information law
9) web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original: “Secret Weapon in Action” – concise translation “Secret Superweapon in Action”: mojmir.webuda.com
10) see the article from Berkeley Daily Planet” www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550
12) web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Israel Fields Means to Suppress Palestinian Violence
13) www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf, pg. 4
14) www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 36, or concise English translation of the book „Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia“ at mojmir.webuda.com
15) Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy PrgPrev=TYPEF@A4%7CPRG@QUERY%7CAPP@PV2%7CFILE@BIBLIO99%7CNUMERO@5%7CYEAR@99%7CPLAGE@1&LANGUE=EN“>www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?PRG=DOCPV&APP=PV2&DATE=280199&DATEF=990128&TPV=DEF&TYPEF=A4&POS=1&SDOCTA=8&TXTLST=1&Type_Doc=RESOL&PrgPrev=TYPEF@A4%7CPRG@QUERY%7CAPP@PV2%7CFILE@BIBLIO99%7CNUMERO@5%7CYEAR@99%7CPLAGE@1&LANGUE=EN
16) Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation there see pg. 3 – Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian Federation)
17) See ref. 16, pg. 19, “The International Cooperation of the Russian Federation in the Field of Ensuring Information Security”
18) Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, ed. Lt.Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air University Press, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, june 1986 (on Internet the site exists, but can not be found)
19) Francis H. Crick: The Astonishing Hypothesis. The Scientific Search for the
Soul, Simon and Schuster, London, 1994, U.K.
20) Wolf Singer: The Formation of Representations in the Cerebral Cortex, 1992, Editor: Arzneimittelinformation/Medizinische redaktion, Schering, Germany, ISSN 0940-9300
21) Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, supplement no. 45, 1996, “Continuous Wave-Form Analysis”, page 64
22) John Marks: The CIA and Mind Control – the Search for Manchurian Candidate, USA, 1988, ISBN 0-440-20137-3
23) James C. Lin: Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, Charles C. Thomas publisher, Springfield, Illinois, USA, ISBN 0-398-03704-3, (experiments by McAffee conducted in 1961, 1962 and 1970)
24) Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine, 1990, conference proceedings
25) Critere d’hygiene de l’environment, frequence radioelectric et
hyperfrequences, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland, 1981
26) Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems, ed. Ross Adey, proceedings of the conference, Plenum Press, New York, London, 1984
27) magazine OMNI, February 1985, Kathleen McAuliffe “The Mind Fields”
28) Allan H. Frey, 1962, Human Auditory System Response to Modulated
Electromagnetic Energy, Journal of Aplied Physiology, 17/4, pg. 689 – 692 – jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/4/689
E..M. Taylor. B-. Ashelman, 1974, Analysis of Central Nervous System
Involvment in Microwave Auditory Effects, Brain research, vol. 74, pg. 201 -206
J.L. Flanagan, 1961, Audibility of Periodic Pulses and a Model for the Threshold, Journal of Acoustic Society of America, vol. 33 (11), pg. 1540 – 49 K.R. Foster, E.D. Finch, 1974, Microwave Hearing: evidence for Thermoacoustic Auditory Stimulation by Pulsed Microwaves, Science, vol. 185, pg. 256 -258
29) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391
30) Dr. Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of
Life, William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985
32) Robert Becker: Cross Currents, The Startling Effects of Electromagnetic
Radiation on Your Health, 1991, Bloomsberry Publishing, London, Great Britain, ISBN 0-7475-0761-9
33) Dr. Nick Begich, Jeanne Maning: Angels Don’t Play this HAARP, Earthpulse
Press, P.O. Box 393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA (on Internet you will find the reference to the “Final Report…” but the site can not be found)
34) M.A. Persinger: On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human brain
by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms, Perception and Motor Skills, june 1995, vol. 80, pg. 791 -799 – www.whale.to/b/persinger.html , www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396
35) John B. Alexander: The New Mental Battelfield: Beam me up Spock, Military
Review, Dec. 1980 www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon16.htm
36) Steven Metz, James Kievit, “The Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict
Short of War, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle
Barracks, PA 17013-5050 www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=241
37) Mlada Fronta Dnes, March 28, 1997 (the Czech newspaper)
40) Working document for STOA panel of the European Parliament entitled “Crowd Control Technologies” – www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET%282000%29168394%28PAR01%29_EN.pdf (pg. Xlvi)
www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET%282000%29168394%28PAR00%29_EN.pdf (Appendix 6-67)
41) Jose M. R. Delgado: Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized
Society, 1969, USA
42) Russian weekly “Argumenty I Fakty”, number 32, August 2003, article title: “Versii ubiistva generala Rokhlina” (Versions of Murder of General Rokhlin)
43) Walter J. Freeman: Mass Action in the Nervous System, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London, 1975
44) Manuel Zelaya undergoes strange siege inside Brazilian embassy, Fabiano Maisonnave, The Guardian, Sunday 25 October 2009 www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/25/honduras-manuel-zelaya-embassy-siege
45) Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya Speaks from the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa, Democracy Now, Monday, October 5, 2009
II. THE WAYS TO DEFEAT THE SECRECY SURROUNDING THE EXISTENCE OF MINDCONTROL TECHNOLOGY
COVERT HARASSMENT CONFERENCE 2014, BRUSSELS, 20 NOVEMBER 2014
Speaker: Mojmír Babáček
Mojmír Babáček is a writer from the Czech Republic. He published several well-known articles about mind control and mind control technology.
The Ways to Defeat the Secrecy surrounding the existence of mind control technology
Mojmir Babacek is looking for information and for people to monitor certain activities of governments, see below. He can be contacted by sending an email to: email@example.com.
Below is the full text of Mojmir Babacek’s lecture.
THE WAYS TO DEFEAT THE SECRECY SURROUNDING THE EXISTENCE OF MINDCONTROL TECHNOLOGY
Written by Mojmír Babáček, November 2014.
Edited by Rudy Andria, December 2014.
There has been in the past decade an obvious tendency in world politics to place the struggle for power above the struggle for democracy. This can be exemplified by the current situation in Ukraine. You probably know that in the recent elections the majority of eastern Ukrainians did not vote for parties promoting Ukrainian membership in the European Union. Yet, both democratic European Union and the USA support the war of western Ukrainians against their eastern compatriots, while democratic Russia supports eastern Ukrainians in the war against western Ukrainians. Isn’t this an evidence that in the contemporary world democracy is not the priority for the power elites and financial entities behind them?
The issue of the classification of mind control technologies is part of this policy of favoring power to the detriment of democracy. There would be no reason to hide those technologies from people if we were living in a world where democracy would prevail.
The fact that mind control technologies are classified is the reason why mind control technologies can be used on innocent people. Governments are perfectly aware of the fact that once the citizens know that their governments are in possession of the technology which can be used to control the citizens’ thinking and bodily functions, they would demand an immediate and verifiable ban of those technologies. Knowing that governments are in possession of such technologies is tantamount to knowing that democracy no longer exists. Consequently, our effort to disseminate information on the existence of this technology among people is an effort to save democracy and the salvation of democracy can also be defined as a goal of this conference.
For the victims of experimentation with those technologies, the classification of those technologies is the major obstacle to regaining freedom and good health. Once the technology meant for the remote control of the human nervous system is declassified, the only possible thing to do next is the promulgation of a law banning the use of those technologies and the setting up of some teams in a position to measure and detect harmful radiations and their sources. Targeted victims will then be able to demand that the use of those technologies against them should be controlled and that their torture be put to an end. The major problem is that so far only very few people are affected by those radiations and they have no chance to prevail in democratic processes since they are few in number.
There are several ways of attracting loads of people’s attention to the issue of mind control technologies andto make lawmakers and government officials work towards the ban of the use of radiations on the nervous system:
The first approach is to disseminate convincing evidence on the existence of mindcontrol technology via the Internet. There is a certain amount of published scientific experiments proving that pulsed microwaves can produce effects on the nervous system including auditory hallucinations and microwave hearing. This scientific evidence can be supported by information from the Defence Ministries’ websites of the NATO states which are involved in the development of non-lethal weapons. This weaponry includes radiofrequency weapons acting on the nervous system as is stated in the European Parliament’s “Crowd Control Technologies” report http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET%282000%29168394_EN%28PAR02%29.pdf. A case in point is the Defence Ministry’s site of the Czech Republic where we may read: “High frequency electromagnetic radiation… disrupts the activity of the brain and the central nervous system. The effect is perceived by the individual both as an unbearable painful sensation of intense hum and squeaking accompanied by anxiety and uneasiness depending on the precise conditions and parameters of the signal”. In order to hide this information from the Czech public this article, apparently, is no longer directly accessible on the Czech Defence Ministry’s site, although you may still find it, if you know the exact address of the article http://www.army.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=2212. Further evidence of the fact that at least certain governments are in possession of mind control technologies can be found in political actions aimed either at the ban of mind control technologies or at their military use.
Russia was proposing the ban of radio wave weapons which it considered to be weapons of mass destruction in the U.N. Committee on Disarmament as far back as 1986. The only negative vote on the committee was cast by the USA, so there was no ban of those weapons. In 1998 Russia addressed the United Nations, the OSCE and the European Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the development and use of informational weapons. There were then four bills proposing the ban of mind control technologies in the Russian Parliament. The European Union cooperated with Russia in the following year and in 1999 the European Parliament passed the resolution calling for the ban of human beings’ manipulation. Russia and the European Union obviously cooperated in order to prevent advances in the setting up of the American HAARP system which can apparently be used to manipulate the nervous system of entire populations. Clearly, the convention banning the development and use of informational weapons once again was not signed, because of the USA’s reluctance. Quite the opposite, they managed to convince the European Union states to accept the development of non-lethal weapons in their military doctrines and to abandon their efforts to ban mind control technologies. In 2001 Dennis J. Kucinich opposed the decision of the U.S. government to keep their mind control technologies and presented to the U.S. Congress the Space Preservation Act demanding, among others, the ban of those technologies. However, his efforts did not last long. After the long silence on this issue, when in 2012 Russia faced the danger that its nuclear weapons would no longer pose a threat to the USA, it chose the opposite line of action and Russian Defence Minister declared that psychotronic weapons were part of the Russian state’s arms procurement program for the 2011 to 2020 time period http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20120322/172332421.html.
Those governments and members of parliaments’ actions together with the above-mentioned scientific publications present convincing evidence that the devices which make it possible to remotely manipulate the human body’s functions and brain activity do indeed exist.
The trouble is that if you gather this kind of evidence and publish it on the Internet – since no big media dare to publish classified information – your publication on the Internet is bound to be targeted by government agencies. Here’s a case in point again: when I published the article “How Far in the Future is the Ban of Psychotronic Weapons”, all messages referring to my international webpage were blocked and treated as spams on Facebook and as malware on Twitter. My webpages connected with this information both in Czech and English languages got removed from the Internet. Obviously, western secret services and more especially those from America did not wish any event like the Arab Spring to happen in the western hemisphere countries. We would need some task on a regular basis to expose the government agencies’ activities to the Internet public. It would mean recording the sites with a camera when the information is placed on the Internetand recording them as well, when they are no longer available or when any data referring to them has been blocked on Facebook or Twitter. The videos which show the government agencies’ dealings should then be placed on YouTube, together with the new webpage address of the text in question. The whole story should also be described in a few articles on the Internet. To avoid repression from the state agencies, this task should be done by a group of people and not by only one person. This would be the way of having loads of people realize that the state agencies are hiding from them their possession of the technologies meant for the remote control ofthe human mind and body. If anyone wants to take part in this effort, please send an email to my address firstname.lastname@example.org.
The second way of fighting the secrecy surrounding weapons enabling remote control of the nervous system is informing members of parliaments about the existence of those technologies. Most of them apparently do not have the security clearances to get this kind of information. I have talked to two members of the Czech Parliament but clearly enough, none of them was aware of the possibility of remotely controlling the nervous system. It could then be taken for granted that since they have never heard of the existence of mind control technologies, they cannot feel obliged to ban their use. However, we do know that members of parliaments usually do not care about the issues the general public does not care about.
So public pressure for the ban of mind control technologies is necessary to make members of parliaments feel obliged to work toward this goal. MP’s should be addressed individually, we should make sure they have received the information and citizens should know which MP’s have been informed. Again, this should be done only by an organized group of people and it should be the same group of people who should try to inform the general public. A list strictly dedicated to this task should be published on the Internet.
The third way of making governments and legislative bodies enact a law banning mind control technology and to set up teams of people who are in a position to detect those harmful radiations is presenting the evidence of such technology’s feasibility to the constitutional courts and to demand the verifiable ban of the development, possession and use of technologies which can remotely manipulate the nervous system. The problem is that constitutional courts are usually not authorized to propose new legislation. The Czech Republic’s Constitutional Court does not have this right so far. The only way around this is to file a lawsuit in a regular court. In case this court denies the action, then challenge its decision with the constitutional court. The trouble is that to file a meaningful lawsuit we need irrevocable evidence. Hopefully, such irrevocable evidence can be possible with the use of various detection devices.
Irrevocable evidence is evidence developed in a scientific way. Most detectors available on the market are able to detect frequencies up to 8 GHz. Most scientists experimenting with the effects of pulsed microwave radiation on the human brain have come to a conclusion that carrier microwave frequencies above 3 GHz do not have any effects. The reason is that the higher the microwave frequency is, the faster it is absorbed in the human tissue and for that reason, it does not go deep enough into the brain to produce any effects there. Yet, there are windows with frequencies above 3 GHz where electromagnetic waves would go deep enough into the brain tissue to produce effects on the nervous system. Those so-called frequencies include the red light frequencies and near infrared light. The red light with 620 to 750 nanometers wavelength goes 1 centimeter deep into the brain tissue and is able to affect about one quarter of the brain grey matter. The near infrared light with 700 to 800 nanometers wavelength normally goes 3 to 4 centimeters deep into the tissue email@example.com, but when the geometrical waveform of near infrared light is changed, this light can be made to go to 20 centimeters deep into the human tissue. Red and near infrared lights’ going into the human tissue is explained by the fact that the average wavelength of the cell tissue’s activity in the human body ranges between 600 nanometers and 720 nanometers http://www.elixa.com/light/healing.htm. which match frequencies of red and infrared light. There are studies suggesting the ability of near infrared light to affect the activity of nerve fibres http://www.revitavet.com/CaseStudies/MechanismsActionInfraredLightTissueHealing.pdf. (pg.6).
To make the nervous system more likely to be controlled by pulsed frequencies of light, no microchips are needed. Scientists have developed viruses which can most likely make neurons react to pulsed frequencies of light http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2014/01/optogenetics_the_physics_of_mind_control_108437.html. So, to make a human being likely to get his nervous system manipulated, you only need to make him eat some contaminated food or have him get vaccinated. Just two examples: one of the pioneers of this research, Gero Miesenbock cut off the head of a fly and then used the pulsed light to make its body fly and it did fly http://www.sciam.cz/files/vydani/SA_03_2010/brezen_2010_rozsveceni_mozku.pdf. Another one, Carl Diesenroth, had a mouse run and made it turn only to the left with the use of pulsed light http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88TVQZUfYGw.
However, red and near infrared lights do not go through walls and other optical barriers, http://paginas.fe.up.pt/~ee05005/tese/arquivos/wireless_ir_com.pdf. and for that reason, they cannot continuously manipulate the nervous system. The red light is visible and could be detected rather easily. We often wonder whether the same viruses which can make neurons react to light may make them react to microwave frequencies from 100 Megahertz to 3 Gigahertz, which go into the human brain. If this cannot be done, contemporary science is most likely able to develop viruses which may make neurons react to microwave frequencies as well. The frequencies of near infrared light, which is invisible, can be detected by special detectors http://www.gigahertz-optik.de/272-0-RW-3702.html. We may also wonder whether waveforms of frequencies above 3 GHz can be altered to make them go into the human tissue. Detectors of frequencies used by NATO (20 – 40 GHz) can be found on Internet http://www.bestbuy.com/site/whistler-laser-radar-detector-black-black/1307396490.p?id=mp1307396490&skuId=1307396490.
Extensive experimentation with the available devices should be carried out when searching for evidence of the use of the so-called “psychoactive” pulsed microwave frequencies on human beings. If this evidence is found, it should be presented to the media and the courts. Such evidence should be sufficient reason for them todemand legislation banning the possession and use of mind control technologies by private individuals as well as by organizations and government agencies. It is obvious that the media as well as the courts will want to check the evidence in some scientific laboratories. For that purpose, it is worth asking such laboratories to check the evidence, even before it is presented to the media or the courts. Most scientists are open-minded and receptive enough when facing convincing video-recorded evidence, so they may be quite willing to check everything with their precision instruments.
Now what is meant by “convincing evidence”? According to various studies, the power density of electromagnetic radiation in the cities is most of the time no more than 5 microwatts per square centimeter. However, in an Indian city the measurement has happened to reach 1mw per square centimeter. Most scientists who experimented with the effects of microwave radiation on human organisms have agreed that the necessary power density does not exceed 10 mW per square centimeter. In Allen Frey’s experiment with microwave auditory effect, the average power density has varied for different frequencies and pulse widths from 0.4 mW per square centimeter to 7.1 milliwat per square centimeter. In Ross Adey’s experiments with calcium efflux from the nervous system, the efflux has occurred only within the range of power density from 0.1 to 1mW per square centimeter. In other units he got the best results when using the intensity of electromagnetic field of 10 V per meter and 56 V per meter. Given that the power density of mind control frequencies is close to electromagnetic smog in the cities, it is advisable to take the power-density measurements outside the cities. The measurements should be taken as far away as possible from cell phone antennas and from power lines underneath which the intensity of electromagnetic field may reach 100 V per meter. They should also be taken as far away as possible from high voltage power lines underneath which the intensity of electromagnetic field may reach 10.000 V per meter. The individual being measured should approach the measuring individual in such a way as that the measuring individual could see through his video-recording whether the power density is rising with the approaching individual who is being measured. The experiment should be repeated several times. The device for the measurement in Volts per meter of intensity of electromagnetic fields in frequencies from 5 Hz to 400 KHz (more accurately 1 microwatt per square centimeter) and power density of electromagnetic fields in frequencies from 300 Megahertz to 2000 Megahertz (2 Gigahertz) in milliwats per square centimeter is the Electromagnetic Radiation Detector DT-1180 which can be found on the Internet and can be bought for 21 U.S. dollars.
As for frequency counters it is rather impossible to find evidence of microchips both inside and outside the city, due to the overwhelming presence of electromagnetic waves in the modern environment. But there are caves or ancient mines accessible to the public, where electromagnetic waves in microwave frequencies do not penetrate. The staff at those sites does not object to performing measurements in their facilities. If the chip is not getting its energy from the outside antenna, it should still be working, even when it is in a cave or a mine. It should be measured with a frequency counter and also with a device which can measure the power density. Please note that the Aceco FC-6002 Mk2 frequency counter which can record frequencies up to 6 Gigahertz can be bought for 149 euros. The measurements should be recorded on a camera. They should also be repeated on the same spot without the measured individual’s presence and on a person who is not claiming to be targeted by brain control radiation. The measurements should be repeated several times in front of the camera. The video recordings should be then presented to scientists who have access to electromagnetically shielded rooms and they should be asked to check the presence of the chip with their equipment. The scientific evidence should then be presented to the media and the courts. To save money one could start by buying only the electromagnetic radiation detector. If any of you may find the evidence, would you be so kind as to let me know at my e-mail address firstname.lastname@example.org.
There is one more experiment which could be worth trying, though it would not bring out any objective evidence. We should try and see to which extent the experience of an individual who claims to be targeted would change when the magnetic field where he is changes. When Ross Adey carried out his experiments with calcium efflux from neurons, other scientists found out that they had to use microwave pulses frequencies different from Ross Adey’s, so as to obtain the same results. When searching for the reason for this phenomenon, they found out that the variations of the strength of the earth’s magnetic field at the locations of their experiments were responsible for the variations in effective pulse frequencies in their experiments. Finally, Ross Adey placed next to a chicken some brains he was experimenting with a Helmholtz coil, which cut in half the earth magnetic fields. Now, to cause the efflux of calcium from neurons he needed a frequency of microwave pulses of 30 Herz instead of pulse frequency of 15 Herz. The explanation for this phenomenon is the cyclotron resonance. For this purpose, it would be important to see if the experience of a targeted person would change in the presence of a strong artificial magnetic field or Helmholtz coil. In the 70’s of the past century the hairdryers’ helmets produced magnetic fields of about 30 Gauss. The strength of the earth magnetic field varies from 0,25 to 0,65 Gauss. If the current hairdryers’ helmets still produce strong magnetic fields, it would be worth seeing if the experience of a targeted person would change, when he or she is drying his/her hair in the helmet. If not, it would be worth a try to buy the oldfashion helmet. Should the experience of several people claiming to be targeted change on account of the earth’s magnetic field, then this would be a definite proof that those people are subjected to the effects of pulsed microwave radiation. So there only remains to find the carrier frequency used against those individuals. If any of you try it, please let me know the results at email@example.com. Another way of experiencing a strong artificial magnetic field would be getting the opportunity to be checked with magnetic resonance which usually takes over half an hour. Solenoid would work as well.
There should be a list on the Internet which should be strictly dedicated to scientific research concentrating on the possible use of pulsed electromagnetic waves on human beings.
I came across a proposal from Chinese scientists on the Internet some eight years ago. It was about developing a direct brain to brain communication with the use of the concept of non-local electron and photon connection. This concept of quantum physics states that when two electrons or photons meet, their reactionsbecome coupled, no matter how far away from each other they are. There is strong likelihood that if the photons and electrons in two brains or in a single brain and a neurocomputer are made to meet, the two brains or a single brain and a neurocomputer will become intertwined. As we have previously seen, the near infrared light can be made to go 20 centimeters deep into the brain. This could be possibly the way to make the photons in two brains meet and to interconnect one brain with the other brain or with the computer simulating brain activity. I do realize that detecting such a malicious act coming from some government organizations is rather impossible once it is done. We may rightly wonder whether the weapons using unknown physics concepts may include them. Please note that the Russians have recently announced the development of such concepts. The possible defence against this kind of manipulation of the human brain could be the replacement of ”acquainted” photons in the brain by new photons, through a long exposure to near infrared light. If anybody tries it, it would be worth getting the near infrared light generator to go 20 cm deep into the tissue with adjusted waveshape. Please make sure that it does not generate near infrared light which warms up the tissue and could cause brain damage. The near infrared light warms up the tissue only at 0.2 degree Celsius. If anybody tries this, please let me know the results at firstname.lastname@example.org.
As a conclusion, I would like to stress once again that in modern days, with the incredible advances science and technology are making, the ban on accessing the human brain with various radiations from the part of governments and malicious organizations or individuals should be written in the constitutions of all the countries worldwide. Otherwise, the concepts of the independence of a human being and democracy would be destroyed.
At the present time the major obstacle to reaching this goal is the struggle of the USA and its financial and corporate elites to achieve global power rather than sharing it with Russia, with the European Union and with other democratic countries including China. If the human world is supposed to have any humanistic and democratic future, the struggle for world domination by individual governments must definitely be put to an end.
Written by Mojmír Babáček, November 2014.
Edited by Rudy Andria, December 2014.