DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID-19 VACCINES BY MICRO-RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY Dr. Pablo Campra Nov. 2, 2021
Important Links:
DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID-19 VACCINES BY MICRO-RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY Dr. Pablo Campra Nov. 2, 2021
NEW – DR CAMPRA PROVES GRAPHENE OXIDE IN COVID VACCINES
[Spain] What’s In The Vials? (Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra)
TV Interview with Dr. Pablo Campra:
Mark Playne
Nov 7, 2021
NEW – DR CAMPRA PROVES GRAPHENE OXIDE IN COVID VACCINES
Dr Campra has released his latest research.
This is his short video introduction to the work.
Not On The Beeb, courtesy of the Spanish Quinta Columna team, is the first English speaking channel to release his work.
Download Dr Campra’s Nove 2021 paper here:
Dr-CAMPRA_DETECTS_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES. NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk
.pdf
Download PDF • 3.59MB
HISTORY
Dr Pablo Campra from Almeria University was the first to deduce that the Pfizer vaccine most probably contained Graphene Oxide flakes.
However, this was just a visual match.
His initial images of what appeared to be Graphene Oxide went viral worldwide.
See our report here where you can download his original paper. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper
Graphene Oxide was later backed by The Scientist’s Club, A German collective and Dr Young.
The theory is that Graphene Oxide flakes are responsible for the vaccine-induced magnetism that we have witnessed internationally.
Dr Andrew Goldsworthy (retired) of Imperial College London has explained the possible mechanism here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/dr-andrew-goldsworthy
Not On The Beeb has many articles and films linked to vaccine-induced magnetism here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetism including a key petition calling for an urgent investigation.
Yet so far, no one has (at least publically) taken the analysis of the vaccines further to provide a definite conclusion
Hence Dr Campra’s conclusion confirming graphene oxide within the covid vaccines is a major step forwards.
His technique has been to use using micro-RAMAN infrared spectroscopy combined with microscope analysis
Below are some highlights from the report.
(Please download the full paper for proper reading – link at top of article)
ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY Fundamentalsofthemicro-Ramantechnique Due to the characteristics of the sample and to the dispersion of objects with a graphene appearance of micrometric size in a complex matrix of indeterminate composition, the direct application of spectroscopic methods does not allow characterization of the nanoparticles studied here without a previous microscopic localization or fractionation from the original sample.
Therefore, microscopy coupled to RAMAN spectroscopy (micro- RAMAN) was selected as an effective technique for an exhaustive screening of micrometric objects visible under the optical microscope.
RAMAN infrared spectroscopy is a fast, non-destructive technique that allows the verification of the structure of this material by identifying vibrational modes and phonons generated after excitation with monochromatic laser, generating inelastic dispersion that manifests itself in peaks of infrared emission that are a characteristic signature of the reticular structure of graphene and derivatives.
Coupled optical microscopy allows the excitation laser to be focused on specific objects and points located on objects, to reinforce the degree of confidence in identifying the nature of the material, and to obtain complementary information on thickness, defects, thermal conductivity and edge geometry of graphene nanocrystalline structures.
Equipment used for micro-Raman spectroscopy
RAMAN LASER SPECTROMETER JASCO NRS-5100 Confocal Raman MICROSCOPE with spectrograph, includes: -variety of magnification and working distances from x5 to x100 -up to 8 lasers ranging from UV to NIR -SRI (spatial resolution image) to simultaneously view the sample image and the laser point. -DSF (Dual Spatial Filtration) that optimizes the confocal focus of the image produced by the objective lens to reduce aberration and improve spatial resolution and reduce the effects of matrix fluorescence. The spectra were analyzed with SPECTRA MANAGER software, version 2. JASCO Corporation. Previously, the equipment was calibrated with a silicon standard at 520 cm-1.
1.3. Micro-Raman spectroscopy of graphite and graphene
1. NANOCRYSTALLINESTRUCTUREBANDS -G-band (~1580-1600 cm-1): Indicates a permissible phonon vibration (elementary vibration of the net) in the plane of the aromatic ring (sp2 hybridization), characteristic of the crystalline structure of graphite and graphene. It presents a red shift (lower frequency, in cm-1), as well as higher intensity with a higher number of layers. On the contrary, the higher energy in doped graphene shows as a blue shift (higher frequency in cm-1), along the 1580-1600 cm-1 range (Ferrari et al, 2007). -2D band (~2690 cm) (or G’): Indicates stacking order. It depends on the number of layers, it does not depend on the degree of defects, but its frequency is close to twice that of peak D. Its position oscillates according to the type of doping. The presence of single-layer graphene (SLG) has been associated with the presence of an isolated and sharp 2D peak, increasing in width according to the number of layers (Ni et al., 2008). – The ratio of I2D/IG is proportional to the number of layers of the graphite network. – In graphite G and 2D appear are sharper and narrower than in graphene.
2. BANDS ACTIVATED BY ANOMALIES in the graphitic structure. These bands are generated by elastic dispersion (of the same energy) of load conveyors and by phonon confinement (Kohn’s anomaly in phonon dispersion). In graphene oxides (GO) the disorder comes from the insertion of hydroxyl (-OH) and epoxide (-O-) groups. -D band (~1340 cm-1). It shows the density of defects in the crystal network due to functionalization, doping or structural anomalies generating holes or new sp3 (C-C) centers. The intensity of the D-band decreases with the alignment of layers in the graphitic structure. -D’ band (~1620 cm-1). It follows a double resonance behavior due to network defects. Sometimes it merges with the G band due to blueshift of the latter. -D+G band (~2940 cm-1)
PARAMETERS INTRODUCING FREQUENCY VARIABILITY (cm-1), INTENSITY AND SHAPE OF THE RAMAN BANDS
These parameters have not been studied in detail in this report but should be considered in the future for the assignment of bands to vibrational modes.
– Degree and type of disorder (doping, breaks, etc.), that cause wider width of the G, D, and 2D peaks by decreasing the phonon lifetime (molecular vibration)
– The G-band does not show differences in intensity due to disorder, but the ratio (ID/ IG) does vary with D band changes.
– Compression and stretching of the network by doping. There may be blueshifts (>cm) in all bands (up to 15 cm−1 in G and 25 cm−1 in 2D) and band narrowing(up to 10 cm −1)
e.g. “back gates” by doping with oxides through deposition
– By sheet bending the 2D band also increases, with no change in G, but with blueshifts between 4-12 cm−1 can occur.
– Stacking level or number of layers
– Functionalization (introduction of functional groups) of the network generates the appearance of new Raman peaks: 746 cm−1 (C–S stretching), 524, 1062, 1102, 1130 cm−1 (skeletal vibrations, CCCC trans and gauche), 1294 (twisting), 1440, 1461 (C–H deformation, scissoring), 2848 and 2884 cm−1 (C–H stretching).
– A the same object may show spectral variations depending on the angle of incidence and the layers affected. The edges will show more disorder than the inner crystalline structure (Ni et al, 2008)
– Blueshifts dependent on the substrate employed to grow graphene layers (Chen et al, 2008)
– Variable intensity of the peaks in the same object according to the laser focus point, due to structural variability with respect to the angle of incidence related to the crystal network (Barros et al., 2005)
LIST OF SAMPLES OF VIALS AND OBJECTS SCREENED BY MICRO-RAMAN
1. Samples were obtained from sealed vials of COVID19 mRNA vaccines as outlined in Annex 1. All vials were sealed at the time of processing, except MOD and JAN, which had no aluminum seals.
2. Four different aliquots per vial of 10 μl each were extracted with 50 μl micro- syringe, deposited on optical microscopy slides, and left to dry in aseptic laminar flow chamber at room temperature. They were then stored in a closed slide case and kept cold until micro-Raman analysis.
3. Previous extensive visual screening of drips was carried out under optical microscope (OLIMPUS CX43) in search for objects compatible with graphitic structures or graphene. Magnification from X100 to x600 were used. Object selection criteria were:
1. Location in the remains of the droplet or in the outer area of dragging by drying 2. Two types of grafene-like appearance: two-dimensional translucent objects or dark carbon-like opaque bodies.
Obtain RAMAN spectra of the selected objects
Processing of the spectral data
The list and keys of the objects characterized in this report are set out in Annex 2.
Dr Campra’s summary, in his words.
“We present here our research on the presence of graphene in covid vaccines. We have carried out a random screening of graphene-like nanoparticles visible at the optical microscopy in seven random samples of vials from four different trademarks, coupling images with their spectral signatures of RAMAN vibration.
By this technique, called micro-RAMAN, we have been able to determine the presence of graphene in these samples, after screening more than 110 objects selected for their graphene-like appearance under optical microscopy. Out of them, a group of 28 objects have been selected, due to the compatibility of both images and spectra with the presence of graphene derivatives, based on the correspondence of these signals with those obtained from standards and scientific literature. The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures, however different than the standard used here.
This research remains open and is made available to scientific community for discussion. We make a call for independent researchers, with no conflict of interest or coaction from any institution to make wider counter-analysis of these products to achieve a more detailed knowledge of the composition and potential health risk of these experimental drugs, reminding that graphene materials have a potential toxicity on human beings and its presence has not been declared in any emergency use authorization.”
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The micro-Raman technique applied here has proved to be very effective for the rapid screening of a large number of microscopic objects in the detection of graphene micro-structures dispersed in complex samples.
Compared to macro-Raman spectroscopy of whole aqueous dispersions, the combination with microscopy in micro-Raman has the advantage of allowing the association of spectral fingerprints to nanoparticles visible under the optical microscope. This technique allowed us to focus the prospection towards specific objects with graphene-like appearance, reinforcing their spectroscopic characterization with coupled images. In this work, the preliminary selection of objects has focused on two typologies, translucent sheets and opaque carbonaceous objects, due to their visual similarity with similar shapes observable in standards after sonication or in graphene oxide dispersions (see Annex 3 Results). The difference between both typologies is not due to their chemical composition, both derived from graphite, but only to the degree of exfoliation of the starting graphitic material and the number of superimposed layers, assuming a threshold of around 10 layers as a reference limit to consider that material graphite (3D) (Ramos-Fernandez, 2017). Anyhow, it was out the scope of our work to further characterize these structures.
A total of 110 objects with graphene-like appearance were selected, mostly located at the edge of the sample droplets after dehydration, inside or outside of the dragging area by drying at room temperature of the original aqueous phase. Out of them, another 28 objects in total were selected for their higher degree of spectral compatibility with graphene materials reported in the literature, considering both spectra and images. The images and RAMAN spectra of these objects are shown in the Annex 3 of this report. It is of interest to note that the samples do not dry completely at room temperature, always leaving a gelatinous residue, whose limit can be observed in some of the photographs shown. The composition of this medium is unknown for the moment as it was not the subject of the present study, as well as that of other typologies of micrometric size objects that could be observed recurrently in the samples at low magnification (40-600X).
The Raman spectra of some of these objects were obtained but are not shown in this study because they did not present visual resemblance to graphene or graphite.
A limitation in obtaining defined spectral patterns with this technique has been the intensity of the fluorescence emitted by many selected objects. In numerous translucent sheets with a graphene appearance, it was not possible to obtain Raman spectra free of fluorescence noise, so the technique did not allow to obtain specific RAMAN signals with well-defined peaks in many of them.
Therefore, in these objects the presence of graphene structures can neither be affirmed nor ruled out.
Another limitation of the micro- RAMAN technique is the low quality of the optical image of the equipment, which often prevents the detection of high-transparency graphene-like sheets, which can, however, be observed in optical microscopes with proper condenser adjustment. For these objects an effective alternative for characterization would be to use other complementary microscopy techniques coupled with spectroscopy, such as XPS with good optics or the obtention of electron diffraction pattern of graphene by electronic microscopy (TEM).
Considering these selection criteria, the 28 objects found with potential graphene identity have been distributed in 2 groups, according to the degree of correlation with the RAMAN spectrum of reduced graphene oxide pattern used (rGO, TMSIGMA ALDRICH). GROUP 1 included 8 objects whose spectral patterns were similar to the spectrum of the rGO pattern, and therefore the presence of graphene oxide (no 1-8) can be affirmed with certainty. This spectral correspondence can be considered unequivocal and is characterized by 2 dominant peaks in the scanned range (between 1200-1800 cm-1), peaks called G (~1584 cm-1) and D (~1344 cm-1), characteristic of graphene oxides. This characterization by spectral correspondence between the signals of these nanoparticles and the rGO pattern is f u r t h e r reinforced by the microscopic appearance of these objects, all of them with an opaque carbonaceous appearance similar to that of the standard objects, as can be seen in the photographs in the Results annex. Therefore, we can affirm with a high level of confidence that the identification of graphene material in all the analyzed samples of Group 1 IS CONCLUSIVE, and with high probability graphene oxide structures can be assigned to these nanoparticles. These group 1 objects presented a micrometric size in ranges of tens of microns (shown as a blue line in photographs of some of them).
In the second group of 20 objects (GROUP 2, no 9-28), RAMAN signals compatible with the presence of graphene or graphitic structures have been detected, showing peaks of RAMAN vibrations around the G band (1585-1600 cm-1), compatible with the G peak of the nanocrystalline structure of graphene or graphite. This vibrational mode is generated by the allowed vibration of the phonon in the plane of the aromatic ring (sp2). Its drifting towards higher frequencies in some objects, tending towards 1600 cm- 1 (blue shift) can be assigned to a wide variety of modifications referred extensively in the literature, such as, for example, the number of graphene layers or doping with functional groups or heavy metals others (Ferrari et al, 2007). Visually, this group includes the two types of appearances observed in the standards: whether opaque micrometric objects with a carbonaceous appearance (no 9, 11, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28) or translucent sheets with graphene-like appearance (no 10, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19 and 20).
In the spectra of this group 2, the G peak maxima are accompanied by other dominant peaks of non-determined assignment in this work. A subgroup (2.1.) can be made from of objects whose spectra have the two 2 dominant peaks located in band ranges that could be assigned to the two main vibrational modes of graphene oxide, G (range 1569-1599 cm-1) and D (range 1342-1376 cm-1) (objects no. 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26). Considering both microscopic images and RAMAN signals together, the assignation of the spectra of this group 2.1 to graphenic structures can be done with a high level of confidence. However, although the structural modifications of the network generating spectral signals different than the standard rGO used have yet to be determined.
The signals from a second subgroup (2.2) of objects of this Group 2 (no 9, 10, 12, 13, 18, 19, 25, 27, 28) can be considered compatible with the presence of graphene structures due to the presence of maxima in the G-band, although the use of more detailed spectral analysis algorithms would be necessary, since no clear peaks that could be assigned to the vibrational mode D, around 1344 cm-1 in the rGO standard, were not clearly observed. However, the presence of peak D is not a sine qua non condition for the assignment of graphene structures to spectra, and in consequence these objects have been selected for this report as they are showing compatible vibrational maxima in the vicinity of the G-band (range 1569-1600 cm-1). There is still an open debate about the interpretation of this D-band and its variable frequency and shape (Ferrari and Robertson, 2004). As outlined in the methodological introduction, the intensity of the D peak, generally cited around 1355 cm-1, as well as the intensity ratio with the G peak (ID / IG) is indicative of the degree of disorder in the graphene network, introduced by different agents such as doping, introduction of very different functional groups or breaks in the continuity of the network. In ordered graphitic materials this peak D is absent. In some spectra of this subgroup 2.2., other peaks with higher frequencies (blueshift) than the standard appear, whose assignment to vibrational mode D is possible, although this assignment is yet to be determined by processing with algorithms analysis which was beyond the scope of the present work. Therefore, at present, for these spectra we can only state that the absence or drifting (shift) of the D peak with respect to the location of the rGO pattern still requires a structural interpretation according to the models available. According to the literature, both the variations in the shift of the G and D peaks, as well as their variable width and intensity, and the presence of other peaks seen in these spectra could be due to very diverse modifications yet to be determined, including different degrees of disorder, oxidation, doping, functionalization, and structural breaks. The study of these modifications were beyond the scope of this report.
Complementary to the range 1200-1800 cm-1, when RAMAN spectroscopy was extended up to 2800 cm-1 for some objects (no 3, 8 and 11), a 2D peak of low intensity and frequency amplitude was detected, being absent in other scanned objects (data not shown). However, both in the rGO standard and some objects with G peak maxima, the intensity of this peak was always been very low compared to the G and D peaks of the spectra. This might be due to the fact that, in graphene oxides, the relative intensity of the 2D peak (~2700 cm-1) with respect to the G and D peaks is greatly reduced. Therefore, in this study we have dispensed generally with analyzing the 2D peak for reasons of greater efficiency and use of limited resources required to scan as many objects as possible within a limited amount of time. In future work, it would be of interest to examine it for all objects, thus estimating the ratio of I2D/2G intensities in those objects where it minimally manifests in this vibrational mode, which would allow for estimates to be made about the number of layers of the structure.
The objects shown in this study represent a minority portion of the total micrometric objects visible at low magnification in light-field optical microscopy (100X). These objects were scanned and are not shown in this study because their spectra where not compatible with graphene structures as they lack a band that could be assigned to G vibrational mode peak. It is of great interest to note that many of these objects show RAMAN maxima in the 1439-1457 cm-1 band. Likewise, among the objects in group 2.2, also a prominent peak is frequently found in this band, around 1450 cm-1, in combination with peaks G and D (no 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 28). The assignment of this band around 1450 cm-1 is still pending, since it does not correspond to specific peaks in graphene, but we consider it to be of great importance for the knowledge of the composition of the samples due to the frequent appearance of this vibrational mode. As a working hypothesis, this band is usually assigned to organic methylene groups -CH2- by bending the pair of hydrogens- (scissoring). However, it has also been referred to as a band of moderate intensity associated with aromatic rings, and if so, it could also be associated with graphene (Ferrari and Robertson, 2004). As stated, another possible assignment of this band would be that of a superimposed vibrational mode of some compound other than graphene, more likely, or even of the hydrogel medium remaining after drying, as in all samples there is always a viscous residue remaining after drying at room temperature. This residue could in many cases be manifesting RAMAN vibrations overlapping with the objects that remain embedded in it, but not in those that appear outside the gel at the limits of the drying drag zone. In this sense, it is possible that this vibrational mode of the medium appears overlapped with the G and D peaks of graphene in the spectra of subgroup 2.1. It is beyond the scope of this work to characterize this medium, as well as all the components of the sample. However, there are some substances capable of forming this hydrogel matrix whose RAMAN signals show prominent vibrational modes around this band, such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), methylacrylamide, or the polymer PQT-12 (Mik Andersen, https://corona2inspect.blogspot.com/ pers. com). It is also a fact that some of these substances have been combined with graphene in experimental biomedicine designs that can be found in the scientific literature, for example artificial synapses for PQT-12 (Chen and Huang, 2020), gelatins for neuronal regeneration combining methylacrylamide with graphene (Zhu et al, 2016) or PVA/GO electrospun fibers (Tan et al, 2016). Now, all these hypotheses about the assignment of this peak in the vicinity of 1450 cm-1 remain open. In conclusion, out of a total of 110 scanned objects, unambiguous signals for the presence of graphene oxide have been found in 8 objects, and signals compatible with the presence of graphitic or graphene structures in another 20 objects. The rest of the objects scanned here, out of 110 nanoparticles with graphene-like appearance have not shown signals compatible with graphene, with spectra at times dominated by excess noise caused by excessive fluorescence intensity, so we cannot neither assign nor rule out the presence of graphene structures in them. As a continuation of this line of work, and although our micro-RAMAN analysis has shown conclusive signs of the presence of objects with graphene structure, to consolidate the certainty of identification and to deepen the structural characterization, it would be convenient to carry out complementary analyses using coupled microscopy and spectroscopy techniques such as XPS spectroscopy, or TEM electron diffraction.
For the present investigation, most of the samples have been obtained from sealed vials. Also, during the extraction of the samples and their transfer to slides for Raman microscopy, we worked under aseptic conditions under laminar flow chamber. However, the possibility of sample contamination processes during manufacturing, distribution, and processing, as well as the general applicability of these findings to comparable samples, need to be assessed by routine and more extensive monitoring of similar batches of these products.
Although the results of this sampling are conclusive with regard to the presence of graphene like structures in some samples analyzed, this research is considered open for continuation and is made available to the scientific community for replication and optimization, considering it necessary to continue with a more detailed and exhaustive spectral study, based on a statistically significant sampling of similar vials, and the application of complementary techniques to confirm, refute, qualify or generalize the conclusions of this report. The samples analyzed are duly guarded and available for future scientific collaboration.
THE PAPER’S CONCLUSION: A random sampling of COVID19 vaccine vials has been performed using a coupled micro-RAMAN technique to characterize graphene-like microscopic objects using spectroscopic fingerprints characteristic of the molecular structure.
The micro-RAMAN technique allows to reinforce the level of confidence in the identification of the material by coupling imaging and spectral analysis as observational evidence to be considered together.
Objects have been detected whose RAMAN signals by similarity with the standard unequivocally correspond to GRAPHENE OXIDE.
Another group of objects present variable spectral signals compatible with graphene derivatives, due to the presence of a majority of specific RAMAN signals (G-band) that can be assigned to the aromatic structure of this material, in conjunction with its visible appearance.
This research remains open for continuation, contrasting and replication.
Further analyses based on significant sampling, using the described technique or others which are complementary would allow us to assess with adequate statistical significance the level of presence of graphene materials in these drugs, as well as their detailed chemical and structural characterization.
This is the Original paper published by Dr Campra in the early summer 2021
See our article here https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper
Download his original report ‘The Almeria Paper’ here.
OFFICIAL INTERIM REPORT IN ENGLISH (UNIVERSITY OF ALMERIA)
.pdf
Download PDF • 1.26MB
DISCLAIMER This research has been carried out exclusively by Dr. Pablo Campra, without any type of remuneration by any private or public entity, nor involvement or conformity with its results and conclusions by the institution where he is affiliated.
The characterization of the related objects corresponds exclusively to the samples analyzed.
It is not possible without significant sampling to know whether these results are generalizable to other samples of similar trademarks.
Dr. Pablo Campra is only responsible for the statements written in this electronically signed file, and is not responsible for the opinions or conclusions that may be drawn from its dissemination in media and social networks and not expressed in this document, whose original version, authenticated and signed electronically, can be consulted at the following
Researchgate platform: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355684360_Deteccion_de_grafeno_en_va cunas_COVID19_por_espectroscopia_Micro-RAMAN
Recent Posts
See All
JAB-FREE SUFFER LESS HOSPITALISATIONS
1st June 2022 – UK VACCINE INJURY REPORT
29 Comments
Pablo
Pablo
Dec 14, 2021
Almería University does not support this report https://maldita.es/malditaciencia/20211108/informe-universidad-almeria-vacuna-covid-19-pfizer-grafeno-oxido/
Like
Richard
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
1 child saved from dying with Covid-19 over 117 will be killed by the Covid-19 Vaccine
By The Exposé on November 21, 2021
A risk-benefit model shows that 5,248 children aged 5 to 11 will be killed by the Pfizer mRNA injection in order to save 45 children from dying of Coronavirus.
The Centre for Disease Control’s “Guidance” document describes 21 things that every health economics study in connection with vaccines must do. But the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) woeful risk-benefit analysis in connection with Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) application to inject children aged 5 to 11 with an experimental gene therapy violates many of these principles.
By Dr Toby Rogers
Today I want to focus on a…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Dr Ugur Sahin, the COVID-19 vaccine he designed for Pfizer was designed in just few hours in a single day on January 25, 2020.
No other vaccine in history has been created and manufactured so quickly. Previously, the fastest vaccine ever developed took more than four years.
co-founder of BioNTech
Not only that, Pfizer Chairman (((Albert Bourla))) hasn’t gotten around to having his shot, or Dr Ugur Sahin, last I knew.
And it went from laboratory straight into human arms without any animal testing first – mRNA never used in humans ever before – doesn’t that strike you as odd?
Have you noticed how all new vaccines and medications are going from Laboratory into human arms without animal testing now,…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
1 in 8 Have An Adverse Reaction = 5,427% Increase in Deaths Following COVID Shots VAERS HAFOctober 24, 2021
Dr. Jessica Rose has given another presentation based on her analysis of the CDC and FDA VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data.
by Brian Shilhavy
Dr. Jessica Rose has a BSc in Applied Mathematics and completed her MSc in Immunology at Memorial University of Newfoundland in Canada. She completed her PhD in Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University and then did her first Post Doctorate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Molecular Biology.
She recently made a presentation to the World Council for Health, and her analysis of the data in VAERS revealed that in 2021 there has been…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
ARR Explained: Pfizer “vaccine”: kill 200 to ‘save’ one? their own damning data
Published on November 27, 2021
Written by off-guardian.org
In the early days of the “vaccine” rollout, we ran several articles discussing the risk-reward of the new mRNA jabs. Dr Sadaf Gilani, in particular, did good detailed write-ups on “absolute risk reduction”.
To explain “absolute risk reduction” (ARR) in simple terms: if an unvaccinated person has a 10 percent chance of getting the disease, and a vaccinated person has a 1 percent chance, then the ARR for the vaccine is nine percent.
Of course, that’s just an example, the actual ARR for the Covid “vaccines” is nowhere near nine percent:
This is the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer/BioNtech…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Former Pfizer VP: 0.84% ‘Clear evidence of fraud’ in Pfizer study claiming 95% efficacy
posted by Mordechai Sones September 30, 2021 10:58 am
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon yesterday said there is “clear evidence of fraud” in the Pfizer study that purports to claim 95% efficacy in their COVID-19 “vaccine”.
Yeadon was commenting on an article appearing in The Lancet and critiquing a documentary that scrutinized a Pfizer efficacy study, calling the distinction raised therein between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction “accurate”.
The Lancet article, entitled COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room, says that although attention has focused on vaccine efficacy and comparing the reduction of the number of symptomatic…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
ARR Molnupiravir (6.8% ARR) Paxlovid (6.2% ARR)
Pfizer’s Paxlovid Reduces COVID-19 Hospitalization or Death more than Merck’s Molnupiravir: Absolute Risk Reductions Less
Dr-Ron-Brown November 5, 2021
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.
Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial
November 5, 2021
Pfizer’s latest antiviral pill, Paxlovid (89% RRR), is your choice over Merck’s latest antiviral pill, Molnupiravir (50% RRR). However, your choice of antiviral pills to reduce risk of COVID-19 hospitalization or death is narrowed considerably when comparing the absolute risk reduction (ARR) of the Pfizer and Merck pills: Molnupiravir (6.8% ARR) barely beats out Paxlovid (6.2%). Why is the risk reduction of COVID-19 hospitalization or death…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Dr. David Martin Exposes the Names and Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity
HAFNovember 19, 2021
If you thought the last Dr David Martin talk was exciting, this one, which he gave at the Red Pill Expo is positively electrifying.
He says that this is “final” speech but that we will be hearing from him, only it will be a new version: No more Mr Nice Guy. We get to see a bit of that in this presentation. He is angry.
David has put the names and faces of all of the major players in the theater of the COVID War onto one slide, which he says is important, because “We energize the forces of darkness when we…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Behind NATO’s ‘cognitive warfare’: ‘Battle for your brain’ waged by Western militaries
· Ben Norton· October 8, 2021
· Western governments in the NATO military alliance are developing tactics of “cognitive warfare,” using the supposed threats of China and Russia to justify waging a “battle for your brain” in the “human domain,” to “make everyone a weapon.”
NATO is developing new forms of warfare to wage a “battle for the brain,” as the military alliance put it.
The US-led NATO military cartel has tested novel modes of hybrid warfare against its self-declared adversaries, including economic warfare, cyber warfare, information warfare, and psychological warfare.
Now, NATO is spinning out an entirely new kind of combat it has branded cognitive warfare. Described as the “weaponization…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
CHINA COMMUNIST PARTY BOSSES DISCUSS VACCINE IMPACT ON USA MILITARY FORCES SAY: “EVERYONE WHO TOOK THE VACCINE IS DEAD”
By Edward Morgan October 21, 2021
A horrifying video conference (video below) from inside China has been intercepted by intelligence sources and in it, bosses from the China Communist Party (CCP) discuss the future of the United States after distribution of the vaccine: “Everyone who took the vaccine is dead” they say.
The leaked segment of the intercepted video conference begins with the CCP Boss who organized the video conference telling the other CCP participants “What the CCP wants most is to have U.S. Troops get vaccinated.”
The speaker goes on to say “Once they get vaccinated, the U.S. Military will…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
ARR vs RRR How COVID-19 Jab Benefits Are Exaggerated
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked November 23, 2021
Story at-a-glance
· One of the most commonly used tricks to make a drug look more effective than it is in a real-world setting is to conflate absolute and relative risk reduction. While AstraZeneca boasted a relative reduction of 100%, the absolute reduction was 0.01%. For the Pfizer shot, the relative risk reduction was initially 95%, but the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%
· In AstraZeneca’s trial, only 0.04% of people in the vaccine group, and 0.88% in the placebo group were infected with SARS-CoV-2. When the background risk of infection is that low, even a 100% absolute risk reduction becomes near-meaningless
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Vaccine contents by Dr Young: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines?postId=611fb76141ab600015b9802a
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Dr. Carrie Madej Reveals Tentacled Self-Aware Organism (Also Self-Assembling Nanobots & Nanolipids) in Moderna, Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Vials, Possibly Connected to Hydra Vulgaris “Model Organism” and Human Genome Project
Posted on October 2, 2021 by Ramola D | Leave a comment
Report | Ramola D | October 2, 2021
In a must-watch interview at the Critically Thinking with Dr. P and Dr. T show on September 30, 2021, Dr. Carrie Madej discusses (with Dr. Larry Palevsky and Dr. Christiane Northrup) what she has found under the microscope in a couple of vials of the Moderna and Johnson and Johnson vaccines and reveals the horrifying discovery of a very strange and seemingly self-aware organism which viewers of the Stew Peters…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Spanish Researchers Find 98-99% of Pfizer Vaccine Vial is Comprised of Toxic/Blood-Clotting Nano Graphene Oxide–Also Found in Flu-Vaccines & Now Seen to be True Cause of COVID-19
Posted on July 5, 2021 by Ramola D
Report & Links | Ramola D | July 5, 2021
In major bombshell news that is still percolating around the world, from its release on June 25, a Spanish television show — El Gato al Agua, a current affairs show hosted by José Javier Esparza — broke the news that toxic nanoparticulates of graphene oxide have been found in massive quantities in the Pfizer vaccine analyzed by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid and other biochemists and academics at the University of Almeria, on the initiative of…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
South African doctor uncovers nano-tech horror show in mRNA vaccines, vaxxed blood
by Editor, cairnsnews
The contaminant that appears to be graphene oxide appeared in the vaccine (left) and was also observed by Dr Botha in a patient’s blood (right frame).
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
DOCTORS worldwide are horrified at the contents of COVID vaccine vials and the blood of sick vaccinated people put under microscopic analysis. In the US Dr Carrie Madej has observed in Moderna’s mRNA vaccine the same graphene oxide particles and nano-threads found in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine and N95 masks. There were other substances she could not identify.
The strange rings were observed by Dr Madej in a Johnson & Johnson vaccine appear to relate to…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Johnson & Johnson, Moderna and Hydra vulgaris
Somehow, the good doctor Carrie Madej still has an active Twitter account. That said, she is the one who provided us the lead on Pfizer, Moderna, et al. potentially owning your genes post-injection. U.S. Supreme Court precedent outlines how companies can own living organisms as long as they are not naturally-occurring, meaning genetically-modified organisms. Now Dr. Madej has uncovered perhaps the most creepy information to date related to these mRNA and viral vector DNA injections.
Dr. Madej appeared on the September 29 episode of The Stew Peters Show. She spoke about her shocking findings after viewing the Johnson & Johnson and Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” products under a normal compound microscope that you can find in most high school and college labs. Dr. Madej followed up on her Stew Peters appearance the next day on Critically Thinking with Dr. T and Dr. P. The entire hour is a fascinating listen. But we’ll breakdown truncated, paraphrased segments of what Dr. Madej said:
I looked at both the Moderna mRNA and Johnson & Johnson viral vector DNA “vaccines” under a compound microscope at 600x magnification. I used white light and it was normal room temperature in the lab. Colors appeared over time in what I was observing. Then all of a sudden, purple, blue and green light appeared and disappeared. Some nanotech engineers told me afterwards that the liquids have the properties of superconducting materials, analogous to “injectable computer systems.”
“Tentacle-like, spider, scorpion-like looking creature” in vaccines
Note that Moderna has referred to its mRNA injection as “an operating system” since the very beginning. Dr. Madej described a living creature she saw in the Moderna liquid.
“It was alive. It lifted itself up off the glass slide and its tentacles were moving. The organism pointed its tentacle up through the lens, like it was self-aware. It knew we were looking at it. Some people contacted me and Stew Peters, and said the creature looked like something called Hydra vulgaris, one of six model organisms that cannot die. It continually regenerates itself. You can put it in a blender and it will re-assemble itself afterwards. I was so shocked by what I saw that I cried most of that night.”
RELATED: Japan suspends use of Moderna injections after “metallic particles” found in vials; country continues using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 (September 1, 2021)
Dr. Madej also said she saw “graphene-like particles” in the J&J shots, in addition to the same creepy organisms she was in the Moderna liquid. But Dr. Madej is humble and admitted all of this is new to her, and all doctors and scientists. Thus she did not definitively identify the particles as graphene oxide. Watch the full video below.
So what exactly did she see under the microscope? The first image is what she saw in the Moderna liquid. The second one is the creature of the J&J liquid.
Moderna Hydra.
J&J Hydra.
UC-Davis Hydra Vulgaris page
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Nanobot Technology (NT) & Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Vaccine Carrier and Adjuvant
Updated: Aug 3
Endogenous Crowning and Protein Spiking of the Red Blood Cells After Vaccination
Programmable magnetic nanobots injected into the vascular and interstitial fluids of a human or animal body are found to be deposited into the connective and fatty tissues and then into the organs and glands potentially causing biological transformation of the cell membrane (crowning and protein spiking), genetic mutation, and the death of the cell.[1][2]
Programmable Magnetic Nanobots
Nanobots can be injected using an ordinary hypodermic syringe. The nanobots are microscopic functioning robots with the ability to walk and withstand harsh environments. Each robot is 70-nm in length and up to a million…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Dr. Bridle mRNA vaccine nanoparticles are circulated throughout the entire body: Brain, heart, liver, ovaries, testes and more
Wednesday, June 02, 2021 by: Mike Adams
(Natural News) Not surprisingly, everything the establishment tells us about covid vaccines has been a calculated lie. One of the biggest and most treacherous lies is that “mRNA vaccine shots stay in the arm and don’t circulate nanoparticles around the body.” Now we know that is a complete lie, as new research conducted in Japan shows that Lipid NanoParticles (LNPs) containing the mRNA code are widely circulated around the body after vaccination, reaching the brain, spleen, large intestine, heart, liver, lungs and other organs.
The study paper, originally written in Japanese and auto-translated into English,…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Self-Assembling Graphene Oxide Nanotech Now Found Also in Pfizer-BioNTech COMIRNATY Vaccine: German Video Reveals Self-Assembling Specks and Crystalline Networks Forming
Posted on August 15, 2021 by Ramola D
In corroboration of the Moderna vaccine findings under a microscope reported by American medical researchers here, a video with German subtitles exposing drops of the Pfizer vaccine under a microscope has surfaced online, posted at several channels on Telegram and at Youtube on August 10, 2021, showing an astounding congregation of tiny specks of luminous particulate matter moving and forming networks with each other, then bursting forth into networks of crystallizing and branching antenna-like structures.
Images: Screenshots, Video link below.
These crystal formations look remarkably like the crystalline networks forming in saliva…
Richard Noakes
Nov 29, 2021
Polish Doc Finds “The Thing” in Pfizer Comirnaty Shot
Published 6 mins ago on October 12, 2021
By Makia Freeman
AT A GLANCE…
THE STORY:
Another horrific discovery has been made regarding the COVID fake-vaccine – the presence of a tentacled, aluminum-based life form.
THE IMPLICATIONS:
Reports and analyses are flowing in steadily now that show overwhelming evidence that the COVID vax is a tool by which synthetic parasties and life forms are being injected into human bodies.
Another strange COVID vaccine life form has been discovered under the microscope. It is yet another tentacled creature – and an aluminum-based life form.
Another strange COVID vaccine life form has been discovered under the microscope, this time made of aluminum and carbon. The discovery was made by a Polish doctor by the name of Dr. Franc Zalewski. Throughout his video presentation, he calls it “the thing.” He found it in the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine shot, in 1 of 3 vials he studied. Dr. Zalewski’s discovery comes on top of the research of many other independent doctors, scientists and researchers (Dr. Robert Young, Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Zandre Botha and Dr. John B.) who also found that the COVID vaccine contains all sorts of questionable and outright horrific contents – graphene, nanometals, PEG, parasites, self-propelling creatures with tentacles, synthetic fibers and synthetic self-assembling circular structures.
COVID Vaccine Life Form: “The Thing” of Aluminum, Bromine and Carbon
So what is this thing? Similar to what Madej found under the microscope, it’s some kind of synthetic creature with tentacles. Zalewski compares it to something from a science fiction movie, including The Matrix, which contained an entity which “flies, had tentacles, and attaches itself to other things.” In this case, Zalewski carefully measured “the thing” and discovered the ratio of its head to its legs (a head of 20 microns/micrometers to legs of 2.5 millimeters, which equals a ratio of 1:125). He believes that “the thing” will grow and develop inside people’s bodies, commenting:
“It seems to have a head and 3 legs … It hasn’t been created to just sit there and do nothing … This is a life form … It grew/developed in 4 days … Is this a plant? Dust? ‘A being’ given to people in eggs in a fertile/suitable environment. Somewhere closeby there might be some sort of signal which caused that being to start living. Just as pinecone seeds won’t grow unless they will be in a suitable environment on fertile ground, the same “that thing” seems not to be moving. It may be dormant/sleeping … I hope it won’t be activated.”
Zalewski also points out that he saw more than of these creatures, putting to rest any claims this was just a coincidence. Indeed, with all the discoveries that have been made now, replete with microscopic imagery, could anyone who has looked squarely at the evidence still believe this is some giant coincidence rather than the coldly calculated transhumanistic agenda? Zalewski suggests that graphene in the vaccine acts as a kind of food or catalyst for “the thing” because the vaccine contains the eggs of “the thing” which appear to hatch in the presence of graphene.
Another Video Claims to Show Real-Time Self-Assembling Graphene in Pfizer Vaccine
Independent analysis of the COVID vax continues worldwide. Speaking of Pfizer and graphene, there is another video circulating (with German subtitles) that claims to show the contents of the Pfizer vax under a microscope. The video starts of with lots of tiny white dots or points, and some black ones too. As it progresses, you can see the points slowly connect to make lines, which reinforces a key theme of the synthetic life forms contained within the COVID non-vaccines: self-assembly.
The COVID Vax is a Tool of Bioterrorism and Transhumanism
NWO (New World Order) propaganda promotes the idea that you need to be scared of new threat of bioterrorism and that government will save and protect you. You do need to watch out for bioterrorism but government will be the one perpetrating it, not preventing it. The real bioterrorism is not from some make-believe virus but rather contaminated fake-vaccines with horrific synthetic parasites which, the evidence would suggest, can self-assemble, self-replicate and proliferate inside the human body.
Zalewski comments several times that people have taken the COVID vax voluntarily. Voluntarily. And now many of them will probably harbor aluminum-based life forms inside their bodies. There is so much information now rapidly coming out exposing the COVID vax contents. Hopefully, this information will be shared around the world and will help, by its horrific nature, to put an end to the COVID scamdemic more quickly than it would otherwise have ended. Hopefully, a realization will dawn on those who have been programmed by the mainstream narrative, or who are still on the fence, so they awaken from their slumber and understand what is truly happening here.
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Odysee/LBRY and Steemit.
Sources:
*https://odysee.com/@WakeUpMirror:3/DFZ-TT:5
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-vax-ingredients-exposed-graphene-nano-metals-parasites/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-vax-creatures-live-self-aware-critters-found-microscope/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-vax-contents-2-more-docs-reveal-creepy-microscopy-images/
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/46WS1068DIAT/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/new-war-on-bioterror-everyone-suspected-carrier/
The Freedom Articles