Neuroweapons, Havana Syndrome, “Dark Network Supply Chains,” “Man-Hunting Business” (aka GANGSTALKING) & “Hybrid Warfare;” Presentation By Dr. James Canton (Video, Transcription, and My Commentary)

In terms of these embassy attacks: What is the upside and for who? Who might be interested and why?

Lack of imagination is the enemy of future readiness and those who are involved in deterrence and strategic awareness know the implications of that. Is it possible that neurotechnology could contribute to a new threat domain where the only enemy is a lack of imagination? Many of our worldwide clients are in the audience today.

I’ll frame out for you the big picture of what neurotechnology looks like. We’ve been focusing on the incidents in Cuba. But we really want to know where has this technology been and where do we think it’s going? This is a model that came out of some work that was paid for by NSF over the past decade.

Neurotechnology: What are the top, exponential technologies that are game changer technologies for our civilization that affect everything from health care to defense to manufacturing? Our group identified these as: Nano, bio, IT, and neurotechnology, and later I added quantum as another strategic technology that would yield massive new opportunities….

These are game changer technologies that create massive opportunities; each has “dual use” (which here means, they have “light” and “dark” sides to help and to harm). We are talking about manipulation of atoms and neurons that will shape our future.

Manipulation of these emerging technologies will likely shape future decades and centuries of our civilization.

We can also use these to enhance human performance.

Neural nets at the core of AI involve over a trillion dollars of financial trading.

NSF (National Science Foundation) has been looking into 5 key technologies; the manipulation of genes, atoms, bits, qubits, neuro, and info…. In order to look at all these together, we have to change the way we look at science.

We’ve been looking at neural nets at the core of AI. How do we think of all these technologies together?

We are all living in “Moore’s Law”- Moore’s hypothesis is that computer technology doubles in power every 18 months. And the cost of that power is also being halved in that amount of time.

Now we all live in Neuro-Moore’s law. We have ever-shrinking, ever-more powerful devices. (Referring to the attacks on American diplomats at the Cuban and Chinese embassies) What are the diagnostics and devices we need to interdict and prevent these kinds of attacks? We need monitoring and sensing devices.

Sensors alert through the icloud…. Then we interdict it. That’s an operational deployment. We are looking at the proliferation of these 5 key technologies; nano, bio, IT, neuro, atomic.

Advanced neuro devices include “soft” (“nonlethal”) and “hard” (lethal) neuroweapons.

(By the way, Crisper is a technology for doing genetic engineering…. The skill set required is operating a video game.)

(ETK note: Likewise, according whistleblower and Targeted Individual, Bryan Kofron, the skill set required to track and target civilians (“TIs”) with these kinds of neuroweapons is operating a video game much like “The Sims.”)

We are living in the proliferation of 30 different technologies. These are all accelerated exponential technologies.

There are two parts of Neurotechology: The first is the “soft” or “nonlethal” dimension. This creates dysfunctionality and cognitive impairment, inability to make good decisions, dizziness, health effects. This is a weapons system to create cognitive impairment of individuals.

The second is the “hard” dimension, which refers to killing people.

The issue of non-lethality (as per “nonlethal weapons”) is associated with neurotechnology.

The American officials attacked in the embassies in Cuba and China were attacked to demonstrate a proof of concept, that is, to demonstrate an operational, deployed capability of soft, non-lethal neuroweapons that could and did “take them out of the game.”

Soft neurotech (these non-lethal weapons) have many possibilities in “hybrid conflicts”…. And these are now available. This is the new reality. These weapons have been deployed… these attacks were targeted and purposeful.

Now the issues are deterrence, prevention, diagnostics.

(ETK (Webmaster) Comment: Certainly, this is also true for “targeted individuals”. From my perspective as a TI, indeed, let’s bring on the detection, deterrence and prevention technologies! Or are these counter-measures going to be shared with the individuals they have extra-judicially selected as soft kill/torture unto death targets of these weapons? I doubt it.)

So neuro is likely a game changer, and it has much larger impact domains when it’s in the wild.

The (light side) implications of neurotech for our “Neurofutures” include: These can be used to create enhanced humans, enhanced minds (neuro-enhancements), avatars, and advances in medicine, education, quantum, defense, AI, Bio, smart networks, entertainment, media, virtual minds.

(ETK Comment: The “light side” is the sugar-coating to “sell” neurotechnology as a product line.)

It is a much larger phenomenon in terms of impact domains when it is in the wild.

We model neuronal interactions. There are tremendous opportunities.

There are a hundred companies working to defeat aging. These especially have to do with cognitive dysfunctionality and decline.

We’re in an era where cognitive fitness is a capability that we will all need. So neurotech can be a deliverable…. So we can enhance longevity and health, and these technologies can do that. The other (dark) side is they can also be weaponized, bio-nano-memetics…. parallel phenomenon, by modeling robotics on nature.

Neuronal self-assembly and nano-technology…. one of the factors of neuro-science – My company helped create the revolution of nano-technology in the 1990s. The dark side is the weaponization of these technologies.

I was the first private sector advisor to the “Interagency Working Group on Nanotechnology.” With NSF, we helped create the world of nano-tech under President Clinton and then under President Bush. We funded the formation of an entirely new domain. This creates a new market place and also, the dark side, the weaponization of neuroscience.

Neuro-reprogramming is the likely driver for defeating age-related diseases; to revitalize and rejuvenate even your brain.

(Again, back to the “dark side”): Neurotechnology will drive the next “hybrid war,” which has already started.

(ETK Comment: Let’s re-phrase that to make it more accurate: Neurotechnology is driving the present undeclared “hybrid war.”)

Hybrid Warfare: Includes use of regular military forces, Special Forces, Irregular Forces (i.e., civilians), Information warfare and propaganda, diplomacy, cyber attacks, economic warfare, and, of course, neurowarfare.

(ETK Comment: Other terms for “hybrid warfare,” according to Mark M. Rich’s “New World War: Revolutionary Methods For Political Control” (2011), include Fourth Generation Warfare, unconventional warfare, asymmetrical warfare, net-centric warfare, information warfare, military-operations other than war, low-intensity conflict, peace operations, psychological warfare, irregular warfare, the war on terrorism, weather warfare, environmental warfare, and civil-military operations. Imagine an entire nation clenched into a giant, authoritarian fist to protect the interests of the elite 1% and smash all competing interests…. this is America today.)

Neurotech can make leaders lose track of time…. I want leaders to lose track of time. Is this possible? He turns to other experts…. Yes.

(Webmaster comment: Here again, Canton appears to be pursuing a “limited hangout” strategy. Under Project MKULTRA, CIA “spychiatrists” had developed the technologies of RHIC (Radio-hypnotic Intra-cerebral Control) and EDOM (Electronic Dissolution of Memory) and they were operational in the early 1960s, if not earlier! This “limited hangout” strategy is also a “plausible deniability” strategy, I believe.)

Our greatest problem is lack of imagination. Most of our major threats are lack of imagination about what could happen. We need to think about what’s possible. Lack of imagination could be our biggest problem. There is an accelerated velocity of innovation. We are going to brief the Joint Chiefs of Staff command on this or that. Like planes flying into buildings.

(ETK comment: Another inside joke/lie: Planes did not strike the World Trade Center buildings or the Pentagon. See my 911nwo.com website.)

We are creating an entire new market… the dark side has to do with weaponization. Neuro-reprogramming will help defeat age-related diseases (the light side)…. We have the ability to rejuvenate even your brain.

A Botnet- is like a virus propagating in real time…. It’s an activated silicon programmable neuronal agent….. It’s like ebola for networks.

Every technology has a “dual side”- with a dark and light sides…. We need to be forecasting and imagining these kinds of possibilities because someone has now already shot across our bow (with the embassy attacks)…. This is a clinical trial in the wild. We’ve now got two incidences, Cuba and China….

We don’t know of any other instances of this…. It’s a purposeful attack. OK, we got the message.

(ETK: Again, this is an incredible lie!!!!!!….. Governments, principally the US and the Soviet Union, in cooperation with their academic, corporate, and Congressional sectors, have been systematically testing and developing these weapons by targeting civilians for nearly 70 years! Researcher and lawyer, Cheryl Welsh, traces the first “targeted individual” back to 1955, the very same year that Dr. Norbert Wiener invented the “autocorrelator”…. Clearly, Canton is both lying and acting!!!! I guess that’s what he’s paid for.)

“Fantastic futures” include artificial immune system, synthetic tissue, cellular systems, living cells as bio-foundries, proteomic targeting for cancer cells and other diseases, low cost designer drugs.

(ETK Comment: More sugar coating to sell the product.)

The “Dark side” includes Trojan Horse bioweapons, hyper-virulent proto-viruses, genetically selective pathogens. Also, you can apply the above (bio advancements) to neuro!

What (Neuroweapons) are “Apparently Legal”?

(This slide is 10 years old)

In terms of conflicts, the following are apparently legal: basically relating to psychological warfare, dysfunctionality stuff, rendering lack of capacity, acoustic weaponry, etc.

1) Microwave RF Anti-Functional and Anti-Personnel Weaponry
2) Chemical Anti-Functional Weaponry
3) Chemical Psychological Effects Via Sensory Organs Weaponry (i.e., smell)
4) Chemical Personnel Incapacitation Weaponry (Non-warfare, hostage/terrorism only)
5) PSYWAR
6) Acoustic Weaponry
7) Mechanical Micro Dust

These devices are being carried around from various sources…. This is Moore’s Law operationalized (smaller, more portable, and cheaper devices). These devices are also used for crowd control and there are targeted uses.

These (embassy attacks) are examples of real-time deployment. So it’s not as if this has not been “fielded” as well.

Neuro-hacking includes the ability to create thoughts and blend it with AI. These devices that we think were used externally or possibly internally (in the embassy attacks). Or they are are tied to other sensors, or flyables, drones.

(ETK Comment: Here, Canton is referring to Remote Neural Monitoring/Manipulation, microwave hearing, etc., technologies which are well known to targeted individuals all over the world and which have been illegally deployed on innocent civilians since the middle 1950s!)

In an era when everything is hackable- health devices, routers, (and the mind) are all hackable.

Most devices that are networkable are hackable…. Neuro-hacking allows us to adjust memories at the nano-scale.

(ETK comment: The US and Soviet Union have been developing this kind of “information warfare” for generations. Yes, changing information and modifying memories in the brain is considered “information warfare” by the military.).

Everything that can be made can be hacked. Weaponized neuro-agents, in the era of nano-neuro-biology.

We’ve now had two events of use of neuro-toxins (again, Canton is referring to the attacks on American personnel at the Cuba and China embassies).…. They are clearly weapons….

This is the neuro-weapon supply chain:

Slide: NeuroWars: Near future to 25 years:

Progression: GPS Mining Predictive Analytics, Facial NeuroTech Genomic Targeting, Alert Avatars, Smart Swarms, RoboNets, Human Synthoids.

I came up with the concept of “Dark Networks” when I was advising SOCOM (Special Operations Command) on this concept of “Bad Guy Hunting-Targeting”…..

(ETK Comment: Please examine that statement carefully, as Canton here acknowledges that he advised the Special Operations Command (U.S. Army’s SOCOM) on the concept of “Bad-Guy Hunting-Targeting.” This means Canton has advised the US Army’s Special Forces on ganstalking operations! Special Operations Forces are an integral part of global ganstalking operations.
Here, Canton is admitting that he is an extremely high-level PERPETRATOR!

Canton’s discussion of “Dark Network Supply Chains” and the “Man-Hunting Business” is interesting in the context of the embassy attacks, as these elements are not obviously related to those attacks. However, these elements.are critical components of global ganstalking operations (which I refer to as G5, “Global Government Gangstalking-Genocide GESTAPO). In global gangstalking operations, neuroweapons are used as a part of the “man-hunting business” and it is the “dark network supply chains,” including use of bit coin, etc. that support these black and black market operations.)

Slide: Global Dark Networks; Self-Organizing Systems

These include: Terrorists, Criminals, Predictive, Mobile, Human Trafficking, Cyber Crime, Arms, MNCs, Money Laundering, Distributive, Rogue States, Radicals, Drugs, Fraud…

In global Dark Networks, which have evolved, you’ve got mixtures of terrorists and sovereigns, a variety of actors, rogue states, radicals, non-states, criminals. You’ve got to have banking, logistics, you need to have things to trade that are not monetary, you need to have crypto-currencies, the ability to have monetary forms to support your operation that are not transferable or discoverable; you need to have a complete supply chain. Just like Wal-Mart has a supply chain, Dark Networks have supply chains. Their goal is to produce disruption and conflict. So if you are in the Bad-Guy Hunting Business, you’ve got to have a supply chain.

I’d like to give a shout out to someone from crypto-currency in the audience.

(ETK: Here, Canton is apparently describing the system that supports and actually carries out global gangstalking operations. BTW, he is also describing the mafia-government-terrorist-arms-drugs-human trafficking nexus behind the CIA’s activities for the past 70+ years!!!!! Indeed, that’s what they do and have done since they were formed in 1947. Many simply refer to this octopus as the “Deep State” and “Secret Government.”)

So these Dark Networks work together in a supply chain to plan, implement, and deliver.

To learn their identity, follow the money, follow the logistics, follow the customers, follow the producers….

Slide: “There is no longer any distinction between what is and is not a battlefield.”

Who are the potential bad actors that would do this? The Russian view of modern warfare is based on the worldview that the major battlespace is the mind, according to the National Defense Academy of Latvia Policy Paper. Subtler tools are information warfare, penetration of elections, fake news, fake elections, and non-attributable phenomenon, such as these attacks in Cuba and China. They are part of the same thing.

(ETK Comment: Use of neuroweapons are part of the same thing as information warfare, fake news and fake elections? Then these operations are all run by intelligence agencies, their private-sector cut-outs, corporate-partners, mafias, and the Pentagon- i.e., “Dark Networks”.)

These are supply chains and eco-systems of involvement..

Neuro-hacking- we don’t yet have people thinking about this but that’s where we are going.

(ETK: Again, this man is lying spectacularly here. Neuro-hacking has been going on since the 1940s and 1950s at least! Dr. Robert Duncan’s book “Project Soul Catcher” refers to “neuro-hacking.” And the “Dark Networks” and supply chains have also been operational since about that time. One of the first CIA operations after it was formed in 1947 was to manipulate national elections in Greece and Italy. In that clandestine venture, they partnered with major American and presumably local mafia leaders, and were successful.)

Slide: Bad Guy Hunting Business-Threat Analysis:

Here we are trying to address: Who, what, where, when, why?

1. Identity Analysis, agent, device, etc.
2. Benefits Matrix- Winners/Losers
3. Actor Capabilities
4. Vendor and Supply Chain Map
5. Ideologic, For Profit, Research- likely all of them, least is ideologic, probably. Ecosystems of interacting and related folks.
6. Geopolitical signaling/payback- what’s the short list of trade sanctions that have been imposed, against who? Four major countries.
7. Rogue, sovereign, dark network- maybe all of it. Maybe a carve out that doesn’t know. It’s likely a contractor looking for business and wants to prove up a capability.
8. After Action Media/Data
9. History of Comparable Events
10. Terrorist Product Line Extension

80% of the “bad guys” are doing it for some kind of profit. Isis is a commercial enterprise. It’s interested in the oil.

(ETK comment: Here, Canton “forgets” that ISIS is the creation of the US and Israeli governments, militaries, and intelligence services. But it is accurate to compare ISIS with the terrorist networks in the US and other nations that are carrying out gangstalking operations against civilians. In this case those terrorist groups include the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS, Fusion Centers, local, state, and federal law enforcement, etc.)

Canton: I’m also working with other aspects of this Bad-Guy Hunting thing, one is sensing.

(ETK Comment: Yes, all “targeted individuals” are tracked and surveilled 24/7. Indeed, many are used as sensors themselves, as “the technology” allows the perpetrators to see through the eyes and hear through the ears and manipulate the behavior of TIs.)

These embassy attacks are directed, purposeful, and targeted at a particular population that is targeted and chosen…

So we ask: Who benefits?….

1) The perpetrators are demonstrating a capability set…. Who benefits from that? It’s useful to be able to determine what the impact is. And was the impact what was intended? Again, this was a clinical trial in the wild on humans….

2) The bad actors that targeted Americans…. maybe they are basically advertising.

What’s the short list of countries that have had trade sanctions placed on them? Four major countries. Might this be related to a political payback? Are these rogue, sovereign, or dark networks? Maybe it’s all of them. Maybe it’s a “carve out” and they don’t know. Who would benefit from China being embarrassed? (ETK: America!!!!) That’s a shorter list.

Or it could get more complicated if you have what I call a “fractured sovereign scenario.”

Think of the analogous deployments from “cyber.” Could “neuro” end up looking like “cyber”? Yes, “cyber” is a proven model. In fact, a product-line extension from “cyber” would be “neuro.”

(So the logic is:) “Hey, we’ve done great with cyber in terms of our profit center… AND we’ve got a new capability (neuro)…. Who wants to sign up to prove up the capability?”

The commercialization of weaponized technology is a key driver… more so than ideologic.

Possible Scenarios (i.e., Possible Perps):

1) Fragmented Sovereign
2) Terrorist Clinical Trial
3) Rogue Actor Practice: I’d bet on this…. This is a messy clinical trial… because Americans will do the research for them for free… and publish it.
4) Asset For Hire/Adversary
5) Dark Network Show of Force- criminal/terrorist organization

This is a private sector bad actor who understands social media. Who is attacking a select group of state department officials? That’s a short list…. Do the math on that.

“Fragmented sovereign”… .Most countries have competing factions, or forces, within them. The fragmented sovereign scenario says: Your bad guys implemented this because they are trying to accomplish something else.

Likely, this event was done by a contractor looking for business. I guess this is a rogue network.

(ETK comment: Along these lines of speculation, much research indicates that large corporations such as Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are capable of carrying out these gangstalking operations independently.)

You have to assume we are at the beginning of neurotech being incorporated into the hybrid (warfare)… This test has been very effective. We are getting more data. What’s the next target? It’s not going away. It’s been an effective trial. This is not like super-sophisticated technology.

1) The Soft part- yields cognitive dysfunction to impact decision-making operations, communications, negotiations. The goal is to take parties out. It’s low-term impact.

2) The Hard part (direct killing); I’m less interested in that.

Could super drones deliver this? Yes.

Canton’s Summary:

1) NeuroTech is here to stay and will shape the future competitive advantage of nations, organizations and individuals, for good, bad, and ugly.

2) The attacks on American personnel at China/Cuba embassy’s appear purposeful and directed.

3) The target, US officials at the two embassies, is revealing. There are no other instances similar to this anywhere else. So some bad actor is sending a geopolitical message.

(ETK comment: Here again, Canton is lying or “prevaricating.” The Soviet Union used microwave weapons (the so-called “Moscow Signal”) to attack American personnel in the Moscow embassy from about 1955 to 1989. The blanket Soviet ‘Woodpecker Signal” was directed against Americans in America from the 1960s onward. And both governments and other governments have used these invisible weapons against their own citizens in the gangstalking/targeted individual phenomena since the middle 1950s. So basically, Canton is continuing the cover-up of these enormous government crimes.

A decade ago or more, Dr. Rauni Kilde, former Chief Medical Officer of Northern Finland, stated that this (ganstalking-neuroinvasive operations) was the main policy of the U.S. government!)

A new, neuro-kinetic weapon would be disruptive in an era of hybrid conflict. We have to assume we are in that new era.

So in that new era, we have to have a way to deter, prevent and detect. Thank you.