Webmaster Introduction: Fellow TIs: I find the following information and insights extremely relevant to the types of psychological attacks that Targeted Individuals (TIs) of authoritarian political warfare/state-sponsored domestic terrorism receive on a regular basis. Kate Amber, MSc, “Founder of End Coercive Control USA,” has a website that details various techniques of Coercive Control, including DARVO (Direct Attack: Reverse Victim and Offender), Provoke and Record, the use of Double Binds and the Double Cross in her Quicksand Model of Coercive Control
Ms. Amber’s website is: The Quicksand Model® of Coercive Control Online Education & Training Courses. She offers consulting, training courses, etc. and unfortunately, I believe, associates most of these abusive psychological tactics primarily with Domestic Violence (DV) crimes. While I admit I have no official training in psychology, I believe the abusive psychological tactics she outlines are integral to the weaponized “coercive control” measures secretly directed against political dissidents, political enemies, etc. (TIs, aka “terrorists”) by governments and their private contractors, surrogates, etc. in the so-called “Targeted Individual Program” (Organized Stalking-Electronic Harassment).
Also, please note that Ms. Amber is not the first to identify such tactics and strategies by their first letters. In fact, I put together the following post for this website in 2018: The “5 Ds:” Gang Stalking Terms and Objectives Made Easy: I. “D,” “I,” and “A” Words; II. Types of People in the New War (GISTAPO-666) using the 5 D’s of Britain’s GCHQ (General Communications Headquarters) as a model. GCHQ’s 5 D’s are: Deny, Deceive, Disrupt, Degrade, and Destroy.
To place these psychological warfare tactics in their proper context, I suggest listening to and reading the work of ex-FBI Special Agent and TI, Geral W. Sosbee. Indeed, I believe the FBI, CIA and other USG agencies deploy these tactics against their soft and hard targets (TIs). See:
Here are some of the free, general insights Ms. Amber offers in her website:
I. Targeted & Entrapped: Understanding the Quicksand Model® of Coercive Control
February 23, 2025
Introduction to The Quicksand Model of Coercive Control
The Quicksand Model of Coercive Control, developed by (me) Kate Amber and utilized by “End Coercive Control USA,” is a survivor-centered, trauma-informed framework that explains the layered tactics and strategies coercive controllers use to entrap and dominate their targeted victims. This model categorizes coercive control tactics and strategies into the D’s, E’s, F’s, and I’s, offering a detailed understanding of how coercive control operates on psychological, biological, and social levels. It is a bio-psycho-social framework that takes a holistic and systems-based approach to explaining abuse, violence and oppression. By exploring these categories, we can better understand the mechanisms of coercive control and learn to dismantle the systems that enable coercive controllers and harm targeted victims.
The D’s: The Weapons of Coercive Control: Double Standards, Double Binds, Double Speak, Double Down, Double Team, Double Cross, and DARVO
The “D’s” in the Quicksand Model highlight the manipulative tactics and strategies abusers use to confuse, control, and dominate their targets.
Double Standards: Coercive controllers enforce one set of rules for themselves and another for their targets, creating an unfair and oppressive dynamic. For example, they may demand loyalty while being unfaithful themselves.
Double Binds: Targets are placed in no-win situations where any choice they make is wrong. This tactic creates confusion and helplessness, as the target feels they cannot succeed no matter what they do.
Double Speak: Coercive controllers use contradictory and deceptive language and communication to manipulate and gaslight their targeted victims. This tactic erodes trust in the target’s own perceptions and reality.
Double Down: When confronted, coercive controllers intensify their controlling behavior rather than taking accountability. This escalation reinforces their dominance and silences the target of their abuse.
Double Team: Coercive controllers may enlist others to support their narrative or isolate the victim further, creating a sense of betrayal and amplifying the target’s isolation.
Double Cross: Coercive controllers betray the trust of their targets, often by breaking promises or exploiting vulnerabilities. This tactic deepens the targeted victim’s dependency and sense of betrayal.
DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender): While The Doubles represent tactics of coercive control, DARVO is the coercive controller’s most common strategy. DARVO is used by coercive controllers to Deny their actions, Attack the target for speaking out, and position themselves as the true victim (Reverse Victim & Offender). This strategy shifts blame and silences the targeted victim.
The D’s illustrate how coercive controllers entrap targets in quicksand using manipulation, deception, and tactics and strategies of coercion and control, leaving targets feeling trapped and powerless.
The E’s: The Goals of Coercive Control: Ensnare, Entrap, Exploit, Erode, Prevent Escape Through Escalation, Erase, and Eradicate
The “E’s” focus on the ways coercive controllers systematically dismantle a target’s autonomy and sense of self. The E’s are the coercive controllers goals which keep targets entrapped in quicksand, or return them to the quicksand, if they manage to temporarily escape.
Ensnare: Coercive controllers lure targets into the quicksand with love bombing (manipulative kindness), mirroring, and future faking (which make up the mirage), only to entrap them in the quicksand of coercion and control that is hidden behind the mirage in the background (see image above).
Entrap: Targets are systematically entrapped in quicksand through isolation, financial control, legal manipulation, and various other psychological, biological and social tactics, making it difficult for them to leave.
Exploit: Coercive controllers take advantage of the target’s normal human vulnerabilities, such as by violating or ignoring their emotional needs, forcing financial instability, or triggering their past trauma, to maintain control. Some coercive controllers intentionally choose strong, creative and highly capable targets, specifically to exploit the target’s strengths, and feed off of them like a parasite.
Erode: Coercive controllers erode the target’s sense of self, identity, and autonomy through constant criticism, gaslighting, and manipulation. Over time, targets may lose confidence in their ability to make decisions or live independently.
Prevent Escape Through Escalation: When targets attempt to leave or assert independence, coercive controllers escalate their tactics and strategies. They do so by increasing the frequency and/or severity of their threats, violence, deception, or manipulation, to prevent their target’s escape from the quicksand.
Erase: Coercive controllers attempt to erase the target’s individuality, autonomy, and connections to others, leaving them entirely dependent on the abuser. Even after the target leaves the coercive controller, they often feel erased through the coercive controller’s and/or system professional’s silencing and invalidation of their experience.
Eradicate: In extreme cases, coercive controllers seek to completely eradicate their target. These are the cases that end in homicide, suicide, or homicide/suicide.
The E’s demonstrate how coercive control systematically dismantles a target’s autonomy and identity, leaving them feeling trapped and hopeless.
The F’s: The Methods of Coercive Control: Force, Fraud, and Fear
The “F’s” highlight the core mechanisms coercive controllers use to establish and maintain control over their targeted victims.
Force: Coercive controllers use physical, emotional, and/or psychological force to dominate their victims. This can include physical violence, threats, or coercion. Force can be blatant or subtle, and it often manifests as harsh punishments for non-compliance with the coercive controller’s demands.
Fraud: Coercive controllers deceive their targets through lies, manipulation, or false promises, creating a false sense of security or trust. Once the target discovers that their coercive controller has been hiding things and lying to them, it can cause intense feelings of betrayal, known as betrayal trauma.
Fear: Fear is a central tool of coercive control. Coercive controllers use credible threats, intimidation, and overt and implied consequences to keep targets compliant. Even one single act of physical violence can be enough to instill a deep feeling of fear in the target, leading to increased compliance, and autonomy erosion, over time.
The F’s reveal the fundamental tools of coercive control, which rely on deception, intimidation, and violence to maintain dominance.
The I’s: Coercive Control in The Law: Indignity, Isolation, Intimidation, Inequality, and Indoctrination
The “I’s” focus on the ways abusers strip targeted victims of their dignity, independence, and agency. Indignity, isolation, intimidation and inequality are aspects covered by statutes against coercive control, and although indoctrination is not included in legal statutes, it is often a primary strategy utilized within a pattern of coercive control, especially within groups.
Indignity: Coercive controllers degrade and dehumanize their targets, stripping them of their dignity and self-worth. This can include verbal abuse, humiliation, or treating the target as inferior.
Isolation: Coercive controllers cut targets off from friends, family, and other support systems, leaving them unsupported and socially and emotionally dependent on the abuser.
Intimidation: Coercive controllers use threats, controlling body language, or tone of voice to instill fear and reinforce their dominance.
Inequality: At the heart of coercive control is a profound imbalance of power. Coercive controllers create a dynamic where they hold all authority, while the target is rendered powerless.
Indoctrination: Indoctrination is the overall strategy used by coercive controllers to systematically instill their beliefs, expectations, and rules into the target’s mind through repetition and manipulation. This strategy creates a sense of inevitability and compliance, making it even harder for targets to free themselves from the quicksand.
The I’s underscore how coercive control operates on multiple levels to dismantle the target’s independence and reinforce systemic power imbalances.
Conclusion
The Quicksand Model of Coercive Control provides a powerful framework for understanding the tactics, strategies, and impacts of coercive control. By examining the D’s, E’s, F’s, and I’s we can better recognize the tactics and strategies of coercive controllers and take steps to protect ourselves and our loved ones from this insidious pattern of oppression and domination.
NOTE: Leaving a coercive controller can be very dangerous, so it’s important to seek help before doing so. Numerous resources are available on ECCUSA’s resource page to assist you.
II. Coercive Control, The Quicksand Model of Coercive Control by Kate Amber, MSc, Founder of End Coercive Control USA
June 2, 2024
Coercive control is a complex, nuanced, and dangerous pattern of abuses of power. It is the pattern of behavior that establishes and maintains oppression, and it is often said to be invisible in plain sight. In order to be able to see the signs of coercive control, we need to understand the biological, psychological, and social forces that are keeping coercive control invisible.
In today’s blog post, I’ll be discussing the initial trio of signs that constitute The Mirage™ in coercive control. Recognizing these preliminary indicators may not prevent you from being targeted, but it could potentially help you from becoming ensnared, and eventually entrapped, in the bio-psycho-social quicksand of a coercive controller.
The Quicksand Model™ of Coercive Control has been meticulously crafted to expose the often unseen signs of coercive control, making the invisible visible. ECCUSA’s training programs featuring The Quicksand Model™ aim to unveil the triad of aspects that coercive controllers frequently combine to ensure their targets are entranced, disoriented, and blind to the looming threat posed by the controller.
The image above illustrates how The Mirage™ encompasses three potent tactics of coercive control: manipulative kindness (also known as love-bombing), future-faking, and mirroring. Each of these tactics, individually, has the potential to destabilize a target, but when they converge, they form a formidable, almost irresistible force. That is, of course, unless you’re equipped with the knowledge to identify these signs of coercive control even as they’re being employed against you.
Do you see the signs of manipulative kindness, mirroring and future-faking in the image? Let’s cover each one individually.
Frequently, the initial strategy deployed by a coercive controller is mirroring. “Mirroring is a behavior where one person subconsciously replicates the movements, speech patterns, or attitudes of another.” Mirroring isn’t inherently negative: many of us use it to some degree in our interactions. However, when wielded by a coercive controller, mirroring isn’t a subconscious act, but a calculated tactic. This intent becomes apparent when we realize that it’s employed to connect with the target, with the sole aim of ensnaring and eventually trapping them in the treacherous quicksand of coercive control.
Following the mirroring phase, the manipulative kindness tactic, often termed as “love-bombing”, is typically set into motion. Once the target experiences a bond with the coercive controller, fostered by the use of mirroring, they might begin to notice the subsequent signs indicating that they are being subjected to coercive control. These signs can be categorized into four primary indicators: 1. The declaration of “soulmate status”, 2. The showering of exaggerated compliments, 3. The giving of gifts, and 4. An onslaught of constant communication.
The concluding element of The Mirage™ is the tactic known as future-faking. Concurrent with mirroring tactics and the deployment of manipulative kindness, the coercive controller meticulously observes the target’s values, aspirations, dreams, and more. They then craft a picture-perfect future, adeptly aligning it with the idealized version in the target’s mind. This constructed future becomes almost irresistible for the target, as it resonates with their deepest desires and aspirations.
Coercive controllers utilize these tactics across various environments to construct The Mirage™. The more subtly and consistently these strategies are implemented, the more potent The Mirage™ becomes, masking the perilous quicksand of coercive control lurking behind its seductive surface.
Revisit the illustration provided above. Can you identify the signs of coercive control manifesting in the image of The Mirage™? Reflecting on your past, can you recall instances of these signs being used to strategically manipulate you or someone you know?
Seeing The Mirage™ unfold before you doesn’t necessarily make it easy to resist, especially during significant life transitions. Instances such as departing for college, enduring a breakup, suffering a substantial loss, coping with financial instability, or relocating can heighten your susceptibility to becoming a target of coercive control.
Coercive controllers wield The Mirage™ not solely against their primary targets, but also extend its reach to professionals, friends, and family members. This becomes particularly evident when the primary victim (target) recognizes the harm being inflicted upon them and seeks help.
Professionals including therapists, attorneys, judges, police officers, and child protective services workers are not exempt from The Mirage’s™ lure. They are just as susceptible as any other individual to the manipulative tactics and deceptions designed to obscure the reality of coercive control.
If you ever find yourself inexplicably drawn to someone unfamiliar, or if you’re unable to articulate what you find attractive about them, recall the signs of coercive control we’ve discussed today that compose a coercive controller’s Mirage™. And remember, if you detect a mirage masking the quicksand of coercive control, don’t merely walk away – sprint in the opposite direction! The life you save could very well be your own!
In my upcoming blog post, I’ll delve into detailed examples illustrating how coercive controllers employ The Mirage™ to orchestrate a ‘Double Team’ effect. They manipulate professionals, bystanders, friends, and family members into forming a united front against their primary victim, isolating them and, sometimes, terrorizing them further. Stay tuned for this insightful exploration.