Christopher A. Wray Dossier: FBI Director, Terrorist-Torturer-In-Chief, Defendant in TJ and Related Lawsuits, Jewish Supremacist

I. FBI Director Wray is Worse than Comey

by Chris Farrell
October 22, 2020 at 4:00 am

We must now come to grips with the likelihood that Wray is worse for the country than Comey.

Wray has an affirmative obligation to come forward with credible derogatory information and conduct appropriate investigations when presented with evidence. Even Comey did that. It now appears he stood on the sidelines and watched President Trump go through impeachment unjustly, while having credible reason to believe that Vice President Biden had actually done all of the very things Trump was falsely accused of doing. Wray had a legal obligation to tell the Attorney General, the President and the Congress. He had a moral obligation to tell the American people.

Wray’s record of non-performance was bad enough. Wray could not see the gross political bias in the FBI. He does not see voter fraud. Wray covers-up for corrupt FBI agents. He claims the violent domestic terrorist group Antifa is more of an ideology. These are astounding denials of documented facts.

Here is the bigger question concerning FBI Director Wray: What is going on within the FBI about which we have no idea? One is left to imagine the once vaunted Bureau as nothing but a rat’s nest of corruption populated by either political schemers or careerist ostriches obsessed with their pensions and post-retirement, FBI-referred jobs.

FBI Director Christopher Wray. (Photo by Joshua Roberts/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

Christopher Wray assumed office as the eighth director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on August 2, 2017. He was preceded by the odious coup-plotter James Comey. We must now come to grips with the likelihood that Wray is worse for the country than Comey.

The old adage that “the cover-up is worse than the crime” is applicable here. Comey’s plot was seditious. Wray’s conspiracy runs deeper. He adopted the wrongdoing of Comey and talked it away in Washingtonian passive voice: “mistakes were made.” Wray engaged in a program of damage control and institutional preservation for the disgraced FBI. He did not clean house and reform. Wray is acting as a legal obstructionist, fighting tooth and nail to keep the full story of the corrupt “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation of President Trump and his associates from the American people. FISA warrants are phonied-up and courts lied to repeatedly? Oh, that’s a “training” problem.

In the past few days, the New York Post broke stunning news (actively suppressed by social media) that former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, left three water-damaged laptops with a Delaware computer repair company that contained a wealth of damning information concerning the Democratic presidential nominee. Information on Ukraine and Bursima (the corrupt energy company). Not just embarrassing or awkward information — no, this is the sort of information that results in criminal indictments. Hunter appears to have explicitly leveraged his father’s position as Vice President — and that there was “consideration” planned for the “Big Guy.” It seems as if Joe Biden knew or should have known what was going on.

The NY Post reported that Hunter Biden introduced his father, the sitting vice president, to a top Burisma executive (Vadym Pozharskyi) who appears to have sent an email of thanks to Hunter Biden for the “opportunity” to meet his father. The email was dated April 17, 2015.

Here is how President Trump describes it:

“Hunter Biden’s laptop is a disaster for the entire Biden family, but especially for his father, Joe. It is now a proven fact, and cannot be denied, that all of that info is the REAL DEAL.”

Additional reporting reveals that the FBI had copies of the Hunter Biden laptops hard drives in November 2019 and then took physical custody of the devices in December 2019.

November and December 2019? That was when President Trump was being impeached. What did Director Wray know and when did he know it? Did Wray allow the impeachment charade to go on while knowing that the exact opposite of what was being claimed against President Trump was, in fact, the truth?

On November 13, 2019, public impeachment hearings began in the U.S. House Intelligence Committee. President Trump was impeached on two counts on December 18, 2019. All of this phony “whistleblower” Ukraine hysteria is going on and Wray does nothing? To the “fair of heart and mind,” we can assure you that the FBI director would have been personally briefed on developments in a case involving the former VP.

Let us be very clear: Wray has an affirmative obligation to come forward with credible derogatory information and conduct appropriate investigations when presented with evidence. Even Comey did that. It now appears he stood on the sidelines and watched President Trump go through impeachment unjustly, while having credible reason to believe that Vice President Biden had actually done all of the very things Trump was falsely accused of doing. Wray had a legal obligation to tell the Attorney General, the President and the Congress. He had a moral obligation to tell the American people.

Comey told the American public about Anthony Weiner’s laptop. Where is Wray’s announcement about the Hunter Biden laptops? Where is AG Barr’s appointment of a Special Counsel?

Wray’s record of non-performance was bad enough. Wray could not see the gross political bias in the FBI. He does not see voter fraud. Wray covers-up for corrupt FBI agents. He claims the violent domestic terrorist group Antifa is more of an ideology. These are astounding denials of documented facts.

Here is the bigger question concerning FBI Director Wray: What is going on within the FBI about which we have no idea? One is left to imagine the once vaunted Bureau as nothing but a rat’s nest of corruption populated by either political schemers or careerist ostriches obsessed with their pensions and post-retirement, FBI-referred jobs.

You can bet “official Washington” has fought tooth and nail to keep all of the incidents discussed in this column under wraps. Lawsuits, congressional hearings, inspector general reports, and special prosecutors have not successfully unearthed all the details. The press reports are good, but there are still some murky details and imprecision concerning the basic interrogatives.

People such as Comey and Wray are toxic to the republic. They destroy what is left of the constitution. They poison the American body politic. The only way to arrest the malignant cancer they represent is through criminal prosecutions. This, of course, is another reason why this election is so important. The choice for the future (and any semblance of restored justice) is very clear.

Chris Farrell is a former counterintelligence case officer. For the past 20 years, he has served as the Director of Investigations & Research for Judicial Watch. The views expressed are the author’s alone, and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.

II. Christopher Wray Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, (Zionist Shill)

(Webmaster Comment: Sounds like Wray is reading a speech the ADL gave him to read! In this perverse, upside-down, ethnocentric worldview, only Jews are human, only Jews matter, and goyim are to be crushed.)

1) Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Never Is Now Summit

New York, New York
November 10, 2022

Director Wray Addresses ADL at Never Is Now Summit

Remarks as prepared for delivery.

My thanks to the entire ADL for inviting me here today. 

I’ve been in this line of work for a long time now, starting out as a prosecutor in the ‘90s and then in various roles in the Justice Department, which included time overseeing what was then the Office of Special Investigations—or as they were more commonly known, the Nazi hunters—whose particularly rewarding work demonstrated to the world—and anyone who might contemplate heinous crimes against the Jewish people—that we’ll hunt murderers right to their dying days. 

I’m proud to say we helped the U.S. track down, denaturalize, and deport more Nazis than all other countries combined. And much like the work we’re doing together today, that effort both required and benefitted from a close partnership with the Jewish community.

The main reason I took this job was my belief in the FBI’s core values and mission – to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution. And I think our mission gels very well with yours: “To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all.” 

That’s one of the reasons we’ve been such great partners in fighting to stamp out the recent uptick in hate crimes in the U.S., I think, because both of our organizations understand what can happen when hate is allowed to fester and grow.

At the Bureau, we confront that reality from the moment we bring someone new onboard. And I want to thank the ADL today for your support in conducting the training that all of our new special agents and intelligence analysts participate in at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Because of your work, our new agents and analysts confront the reality of just how widespread antisemitism, and the willingness to turn hate to action, really are. Your work reminds them what’s at stake; why we all—particularly those of us in law enforcement—must aggressively counter antisemitic violence everywhere it appears.

Our FBI historian recently pulled the course evaluations written by the first new agent class to visit the Holocaust Museum, more than 20 years ago. I found one of them particularly striking. That new agent wrote: 

“The part that lingers in my memory is the photo of the police officer and the German SS officer standing side by side, and the police officer was failing to protect his own citizens.” 

That observation gets to the heart of why standing up to hate is an active pursuit. And it applies now every bit as much as it did back then. It reflects what we stand for and the values we aspire to at the FBI – to protect Americans from harm with unwavering resolve.

Hate Crimes and Extremism 

Unfortunately, as Jonathan outlined, antisemitism remains a pervasive and present fact. And we at the FBI see—up close, day in and day out—the actions that hatred drives. Jewish people continue to face repeated violence and very real threats, from all kinds of actors, simply for being who they are. 

A full 63% of religious hate crimes are motivated by antisemitism—targeting a group that makes up just 2.4% of our population. Foreign terrorist organizations like ISIS have promoted antisemitic violent extremism for decades. They continue to target Jewish Americans in their attack plots. But we also confront the threat of people here, on our soil, whose hateful views—often paraded online—boil over into acts of violence.

There are too many grim examples to choose from, but consider the members of the Jewish community in Poway, California, whose synagogue was the target of domestic terrorism in 2019. The gunman in that attack, in a vile act driven by hatred, murdered one member of the congregation and wounded three others, including a rabbi.

Thanks to the investigative work of our San Diego Field Office, he’s now serving a life sentence without parole, plus an additional 30 years. But his victims, their loved ones, and their communities have to live with the trauma of what he did for the rest of their lives, too. 

The attack at the synagogue in Colleyville, Texas, earlier this year was another tragic example. It happened almost three years later and over a thousand miles away from Poway by a perpetrator who cloaked himself in a different motivation—he referenced violent Jihad. But it demonstrates the tragic reality that the Jewish community uniquely ends up on the receiving end of hate-fueled attacks from all sides. And I’d venture to say no community feels more threatened by that boiling over into violence than yours.

FBI Efforts 

The threats may be coming from all sides, but we’re hitting back at them full-force. And from multiple FBI programs—our Criminal and Counterterrorism Divisions—that right now are laser-focused on the problem. 

On the criminal side, we’ve designated civil rights, specifically including hate crimes, as a national threat priority. That means we’ve surged more agents and analysts to work those cases across the country. And on the counterterrorism front, with the Joint Terrorism Task Forces we run out of all 56 of our field offices, we have nearly 4,500 agents and state and local law enforcement partners working counterterrorism.

And in 2019, we established the Domestic Terrorism-Hate Crimes Fusion Cell, bringing together experts on both. That team addresses the intersection of domestic terrorism and hate crimes, and they share information and resources with our partners in real time. And the fusion cell’s efforts are bearing fruit. 

Just last year, in 2021, Richard Holzer was convicted on both hate crime and explosives charges for plotting to bomb the Temple Emanuel Synagogue in Pueblo, Colorado. Holzer told undercover agents he wanted to do something that would tell Jewish people in the community they weren’t welcome in the town. 

But thanks to the work of our fusion cell, instead, we disrupted his plot before it occurred, and for the first time in recent history made a proactive arrest on a hate crimes charge. 

So whether we’re confronting the threat through a hate crime or counterterrorism lens—or both—our focus is on preventing violent attacks. And within the bounds of the law, we’re creative in how we do that.

When tragedy does strike, we move heaven and earth to find those responsible and to help heal the victims, their families, and their community, much like we did four years ago this October, after the horrific attack on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh. We raced our SWAT team, Lab, explosives experts, crisis negotiators, and more to the scene. 

We also remain a fixture for those affected afterward. In the way our Victim Services Response Team provided food and clothing, grief counseling, financial assistance, and one-stop shopping for federal resources, but also in our continued engagement with the Pittsburgh Jewish community.

When I visited Tree of Life and saw the scene firsthand, I was struck not just by the evil done to individuals that day but by the depth of the wound to that community. It made me angry. It left me feeling the steel in our commitment to battle hate-fueled violence everywhere it touches Jewish Americans. And it once again left me grateful for your help in bringing our new folks to the Holocaust Museum. Because there just can’t be enough reminders of what we’re up against. 

Those are some of the things we in the FBI are doing to address the violence. 

But these threats increasingly require a whole-of-society approach 

So we’re raising awareness through our National Anti-Hate Crimes Campaign, which aims to educate witnesses and victims on how to identify and report hate crimes. And we’ve been engaging the public’s help, too. That includes community leaders, mental health and social services professionals, faith communities, and civil rights and minority groups.

Now, I mentioned that our mission is both to protect Americans and to uphold the Constitution, and both aspects are equally important. We can’t stop people from thinking or saying hateful things. But there is a right way, under our Constitution and within the rule of law, for someone to express their beliefs, whatever they may be. And violence ain’t it. 

So what we can do—and will always do—is bring the full force of the FBI and our partners to bear across the country, and in every community, when someone threatens or commits violence, we don’t let up, and—like the Nazi Hunters in OSI—our memory is long. We never forget. 
 
Conclusion 

I’d like to leave off with a famous quote from Hillel, the ancient Jewish scholar. Many of you will be familiar with this, but he wrote, quote, “If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now—when?” 

This teaching goes hand in hand with that photo from the Holocaust Museum I mentioned earlier, of the police officer standing next to the SS officer and failing to protect people from harm. 

I love the FBI because it’s a collection of men and women who answered Hillel’s question for themselves and underlined their answer by offering their careers, even at the risk of their lives, in service of their purpose. We are for others. For those under threat who need protecting from the violence and destruction of Kristallnacht in Germany 84 years ago this week, to the threats and violence targeting Jewish communities here in the US just across the river last week, we at the FBI recognize that the threat of violent extremism is real, and it’s urgent. 

We devote ourselves every day to protecting the Jewish community—and all American people—from these heinous acts. And I assure you, we’ll remain relentless. 

Thank you very much.

2) November 17, 2022 5:05 pm

III. FBI Director: Jewish Community Under Threat ‘From All Sides’

avatar by Andrew Bernard

Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray prepares to testify in a hearing on the FY 2023 budget for the FBI held by the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 25, 2022. REUTERS/Leah Millis

“From our perspective, we see the Jewish community getting it from all sides,” FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Thursday in a hearing on threats to the homeland. “Not only have they long been a target of foreign terrorist organizations…but then, in addition to that, they’re of course the target of domestic violent extremists.”

Speaking of antisemitic extremism in response to a question from Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Wray noted that 63% of all religiously motivated violent extremism incidents in the United States were motivated by antisemitism, against a Jewish population that totals only 2.4% of the American public.

Both Director Wray and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, who was also testifying at the hearing, said they would support a national strategy to combat antisemitism.

Wray added that while the statistics on rising antisemitic incidents are “stark,” the increases are partly the result of improved reporting, even as under-reporting remains a problem. “Frankly, the Jewish community has been ahead of other communities that are victims in reporting historically. So we have been trying to preach the importance of reporting and we have seen reporting coming up,” he said.

In 2020, the most recent year in which data is publicly available, the FBI recorded 676 religious bias crimes targeting Jews, accounting for 55% of all religious bias crimes. The total number of reported hate crimes that year increased by 9% from 2019, making 2020 the worst year for bias incidents since 2008. The Anti-Defamation League’s Audit of Antisemitic Incidents 2021, published in March, recorded 2,717 antisemitic incidents throughout the United States in that year, a 34% increase from 2020 and the highest number of such incidents that the ADL has recorded since it began tracking them in 1979.

Other Lawsuits Filed Against Christopher A. Wray:

IV. Khalid M. TURAANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher WRAY, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center; Jason Chambers, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 20-1343 Decided: February 18, 2021

V. Lawsuit Against Charles H. Kable, IV, Christopher A. Wray, and Jason R. Chambers (Case No. 19-11768)

VI. KHUSHNOOD ALI BAZ, Plaintiff, -against- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER; and CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center; TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; and DAVID P. PEKOSKE, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, Defendants.

VII. MOHAMED SHEIKH ABDIRAHMAN KARIYE; FAISAL NABIN KASHEM; RAYMOND EARL KNAEBLE IV; AMIR MESHAL; STEPHEN DURGA PERSAUD, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General of the United States; CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation; CHARLES H. KABLE IV, Director, Terrorist Screening Center, Defendants-Appellees

VIII. Yonas FIKRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; Jefferson Sessions, Attorney General; Mike Pompeo, Secretary of State; Christopher A. Wray, Director of the FBI (sued in his official capacity); Charles H. Kable, IV, Director of FBI Terrorism Screening Center (sued in his official capacity); Daniel Coats, Director of National Intelligence (sued in his official capacity); Paul Nakasone, Director of the National Security Agency (sued in his official capacity); David Noordeloos, an FBI Agent (sued in his official and individual capacity); Jason Dundas, an FBI Agent (sued in his individual capacity); National Security Agency; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

IX. ANAS ELHADY; OSAMA HUSSEIN AHMED; AHMAD IBRAHIM AL HALABI; MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN; MURAT FRLJUCKIE; ADNAN KHALIL SHAOUT; WAEL HAKMEH; SALEEM ALI; SAMIR ANWAR; JOHN DOE, No. 2; JOHN DOE, No. 3; SHAHIR ANWAR; BABY DOE, 2; YASEEN KADURA; HASSAN SHIBLY; AUSAMA ELHUZAYEL; DONALD THOMAS; IBRAHIM AWAD; MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN; HASSAN FARES; ZUHAIR EL-SHWEHDI; JOHN DOE, No. 4; MARK AMRI, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. CHARLES H. KABLE, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity; KELLI ANN BURRIESCI, Principal Deputy Director of the Terrorist Screening Center in her official capacity; TIMOTHY P. GROH, Deputy Director for Operations at the Terrorist Screening Center in his official capacity; DEBORAH MOORE, Director of Department of Homeland Security Traveler Redress Inquiry Program in her official capacity; NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity; DAVID PEKOSKE, Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration in his official capacity; CHRISTOPHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in his official capacity; KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, Defendants – Appellants,

X. Abdisalam Wilwal, and Sagal Abdigani, individually and on behalf of their minor children, M.O., N.W., A.W., and A.M., Plaintiffs, v. Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Kevin McAleenan, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity; Thomas Homan, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity; Derek N. Benner, Acting Executive Associate Director of Homeland Security Investigations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity; Jefferson B. Sessions, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity; Christopher A. Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity; Charles H. Kable, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity; and the United States of America, Defendants

XI. Tweet: Why is Chris Wray at WEF?

Tweet

JBamajeans🇺🇸🇳🇱
@45Jbama
Why is Chris Wray at WEF?
Checking in with his Masters?
Traitor of our nation